[stylist] For all STYLIST Members

Mon Mar 30 01:51:50 UTC 2009

my thoughts Robert,
I am quite troubled.  as this list is to include blindness related 
issues, and that was what we were covering at the time of the 
trouble.  we were discussing paternalism, something nearly every 
blind person faces sooner or later.
one of the best things about stylist as it has existed thus far is 
that it does not just offer a place for discussing writing, but we 
have the opportunity for much needed networking.
if we are bland, humorless and not discussing blindness topics, then 
the networking loses out certainly.

I have benefited greatly from the networking and mutual support.

maybe people who have a list volume concern should switch to  the 
weekly summary that goes out, then there's only one inbox entry.

if we do have a separate list for nonwriting items, as seems are 
supposed to be moved, we dilute the mission of nfb-writer's-division 
and stylist, I believe.

as nfb members, it is important for us to discuss blindness-related 
topics.  and I am very deeply troubled that in doing so, I apparently 
triggered an explosion.
jc

Jim Canaday M.A.
Lawrence, KS

At 06:01 PM 3/29/2009, you wrote:
>Dear Friends
>
>For as long as STYLIST has been around, it has been a good journey, a great
>place to meet and exchange all those things that a mailing list is used for.
>And speaking of what an NFB mailing list is to be used for- first, it
>reflects what the groups stated purpose is, which in our case is writing.
>And second, in tune with what the NFB is all about, STYLIST is also about
>blindness. And for the most part, we have honored that dual intent pretty
>closely. Sure, from time to time, we've strayed away from these two themes,
>and even had to post a reminder to rain in our content and return to our
>routes.
>
>Today we find that we have a few individuals expressing frustration with
>recent message traffic in regard to content and volume. (A sometimes
>happening that is not uncommon on a mailing list.) and I believe this is a
>problem which is in the process of being resolved and will soon be laid to
>rest; being the reasonable and likeable bunch that we are. And as part of
>this family's negotiation, I see that some of us feel that it would be a
>good thing to have a place where we as friends, would be allowed to hold
>communications with fewer boundaries. I've asked David Andrews about a
>second list and, yes we can have one if we ask. I personally would prefer
>that we all do our communications here in STYLIST, but hey, I'm realistic in
>that I know there are some of us who are much chattier than others and need
>the opportunity to have a place where they can gather and do their off topic
>discussions. And we have also seen that there are some of us who know
>exactly how easy it is to create another list, as Allen Wheeler has offered
>via YAHOO.
>
>So what I am per posing is, that if some of you want a list to meet and talk
>about anything outside of writing and blindness, then do go with Allan's
>suggestion and offer to set it up.
>
>As for why I do not want us, the Division to ask David to set us up with a
>second list, I have two big reasons why- First, in looking at the NFB-s page
>where all NFB mailing lists are posted as available to be joined or dropped,
>I see that the format of the stated list name and its description of intent
>is kept at a very minimum of wording. Okay, so what I would be afraid of is
>that a second Writers' Division listing on this page would I fear be
>misleading and confuse a new person looking for where he or she can find the
>list to meet other writers for the purpose of discussing writing. Granted,
>the word STYLIST doesn't pop out at you as being "Writers Hang Out Here>"
>but the line below it speaks to who the list belongs to. (Look at the 2
>lines immediately below; they are what advertises our list on the NFBNET
>site).
>
>stylist
>NFBnet Writer's Division Mailing List
>
>Second reason- I sure would not like to have STYLIST'S power diluted by some
>of the great sharing being taken away
>
>Finishing this thought, as I indicated above, if we feel there is a need for
>an additional list for the purpose of interacting on whatever topic we wish,
>then let us have Allen set up a list for us through something like Yahoo.
>Yes, let us, the Writers' Division take care of our own. But I say as the
>President, watch it in respects to not allowing that second list to dilute
>the power of STYLIST.
>
>Your thoughts?
>
>President NFB Writers' Division
>Robert Leslie Newman
>Email- newmanrl at cox.net
>Division Website-
>Http://www.nfb-writers-division.org
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Writers Division web site:
>http://www.nfb-writers-division.org <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>
>
>stylist mailing list
>stylist at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for stylist:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/n6yr%40sunflower.com