[stylist] Writing process

Judith Bron jbron at optonline.net
Fri Jan 14 01:01:37 UTC 2011


Bridget and Kerry, I never did the draft thing either.  All my papers from 
elementary school through college usually got A's.  Even when writing my 
novels I didn't do drafts, But I worked overtime on editing.  Judith
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bridgit Pollpeter" <bpollpeter at hotmail.com>
To: <stylist at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 7:45 PM
Subject: [stylist] Writing process


> Kerry,
>
> Wuthering Heights is my all-time favorite book!  *smile*
>
> I completely agree with you.  We all have to find the process that works
> for us.  I, too, do not really do the draft thing.  As organized as I
> am, drafts have never really been a part of my process even when sighted
> or for academic papers.  I usually received straight A's so I must have
> done something right!  *smile*
>
> This post is very articulate.  Perhaps you would consider writing a 1000
> words or less article about the writing process for Slate & Style?
>
> Bridgit
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of stylist-request at nfbnet.org
> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 12:00 PM
> To: stylist at nfbnet.org
> Subject: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 21
>
>
> Send stylist mailing list submissions to
> stylist at nfbnet.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> stylist-request at nfbnet.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> stylist-owner at nfbnet.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of stylist digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19 (Kerry Thompson)
>   2. Re: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19
>      (James H. "Jim" Canaday M.A. N6YR)
>   3. Re: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19 (LoriStay at aol.com)
>   4. Re: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19 (Judith Bron)
>   5. Re: stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19 (Donna Hill)
>   6. The Tragic Shooting of Gabrielle Giffords (Judith Bron)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:37:49 -0500
> From: Kerry Thompson <kethompson1964 at gmail.com>
> To: stylist at nfbnet.org
> Subject: Re: [stylist] stylist Digest, Vol 81, Issue 19
> Message-ID: <4D2E576D.8090204 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi friends,
>
> Bridgit, everybody's process is different. For me, writing is about the
> language. So, from the first, the words are as important as the story
> I'm telling with them. Of course, sometimes it's necessary to get the
> story germ down as quickly as possible before I forget it.
>
> That leads me to my second point. For me, writing and rewriting aren't
> separate, distinct phases of the process. I'm a tinkerer. I continually
> reread my work in progress, pausing to substitute a better word here, to
>
> expand a phrase to a paragraph there where it strikes me that the
> meaning is unclear. And, as the story grows, especially with a novel, it
>
> sometimes becomes necessary to go back to add or alter allusions or
> whole scenes.
>
> With short stories, too, the manuscript is dynamic. I tighten here,
> expand there, occasionally move or delete entire passages. But it's not
> a matter of Draft 1, Draft 2, Draft 3. I don't work that way and can't
> even fully understand the concept of working that way. But, as I say,
> everybody's process is different. You have to find the process that
> works for you. If producing distinct drafts and revisions works for you,
>
> then by all means go for it!
>
> Like you, I learned to read print, before losing my sight. Like you,
> too, I love Nineteenth Century literature, especially Dickens. Wharton
> isn't one of my favorites, though. I prefer the Brontes. I think,
> perhaps, you and I were taught writing in different ways, from different
>
> aesthetic paradigms. It sounds like you're into modernism, while I'm
> more old fashioned. One way isn't right and the other wrong, they're
> just different.
>
> Chris, LOL That's short and to the point. Very good!
>
> Solidarity and Peace,
>
> Kerry
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Writers Division web site:
> http://www.nfb-writers-division.org <http://www.nfb-writers-division.org/>
>
> stylist mailing list
> stylist at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> stylist:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/jbron%40optonline.net
> 






More information about the Stylist mailing list