[stylist] Lack of Critiques -- Suggestions?

Neil Butters neil.butters at sympatico.ca
Wed Jun 8 15:12:38 UTC 2011


Hello,

 

Donna brought up a good point yesterday, and I think it might deserve more discussion. By the way Donna, you don't need to apologize; I wasn't offended. Besides, by my interpretation of Robert's decision, your NYC Blind Vendor post, like the one on volunteering posted today, is acceptable by itself. Responses such as "Volunteerism is great. Everyone do it." Should be posted elsewhere.

 

Donna mentioned the lack of comments/critiques on her work. I think most of us have a similar experience; I submitted a short story last year, and only one person commented on it. I wonder if it would be useful to discuss the reasons that we don't critique other members' work very often. Maybe then we can hit on solutions.

 

I can think of a few reasons. Disinterest in the subject. I am guilty of this, although I'll never be able to comment on poetry because I haven't developed an appreciation for its beauty and power. Time, there never seems to be enough. Uncertainty. How do I tell someone the writing is weak and a grammar course is needed? This is the mentality of, "I don't want to hurt anyone's feelings," (and no matter how hard I try to be constructive and "nice," some people just take my words the wrong way and get defensive). And finally the selfish - He/she didn't critique my work, so why should I reciprocate?

 

Now for some suggestions. Even if the subject doesn't interest you, take a look anyway. Writers are always urged to read writing from other genres to help round out their own. Perhaps members sending in their work should make a list of things they want commented on, such as characters, grammar, etc. This would help the time-restricted reviewers among us to focus on what the author wants, as well as provide novice reviewers with some guidance. And commenting on the writing of someone who took the time to read your work is simply  a nice thing to do. When I sent in my story, I had previously critiqued the work of four members. Only one of them looked at mine. Finally, for the writers, maybe try discussing the comments with the group. This might bring up more interest in the work. And remember to thank the reviewer. Only half the writers who I had critiqued gave me any acknowledgement.

 

I realize some of these suggestions are used by some people, but maybe a more concerted effort would help.

 

Any other reasons or suggestions?

 

Neil

 

requires . 

 

 

 

 

 



More information about the Stylist mailing list