[stylist] Fwd: [acb-chat] The Americans With Disabilities Act Is Under Attack in Congress - Rewire

Mon Jun 5 22:39:42 UTC 2017

Not to be political,but this is what happens when you hand your future over to evil idiots like the man we have to call president.

-----Original Message-----
From: stylist [mailto:stylist-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Kendra Schaber via stylist
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 11:47 AM
To: Advice and support for blind cooks <blind-cooks at nfbnet.org>; ACB Audio Description Project Discussion List <adp-list at acblists.org>; A B C L <acb-l at acblists.org>; Agricultural and Equestrean Division List <ag-eq at nfbnet.org>; April Motsinger <morrigansdaughter12 at gmail.com>; Annie Green Furball <furball373 at gmail.com>; Anna Cottom <acottom at pclpartnership.org>; BARD Talk <bardtalk at groups.io>; Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics <blindmath at nfbnet.org>; Blind Life <BlindLife at groups.io>; Blind Apple Support List <blindapples at cruising.ultragroups.com>; Blind Law Mailing List <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>; Blind Penpals <blind-penpals at groups.io>; Blind Talk <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>; Blind Tech <blindtech at groups.io>; Blind Woomen Chat <blind-women-chat at groups.io>; Carla McCwillian <president at nfb-oregon.org>; Clean Jokes <CleanJokes at interconnected.groups.io>; Disable People United <disabled-people-united at groups.io>; Electronic Talk <electronics-talk at nfbnet.org>; Environment List <Environment at groups.io>; Eyes Free Fitness <eyes-free-fitness at groups.io>; Faith Based Jokes <FaithbasedJokes at interconnected.groups.io>; I Talk <iTalk at groups.io>; Inter Faith Spirit <InterfaithSpirit at yahoogroups.com>; Jenny Howell <buttongolf at aol.com>; Julia <julia.kulak at gmail.com>; Julie Right <julie at oralhull.org>; Justin Williams <justin.williams2 at gmail.com>; Kurzweil National Federation of the Blind Reader user list <reader-users at nfbnet.org>; Lady Nix <ladymorvani at gmail.com>; N F B Jobs <jobs at nfbnet.org>; N F B Krafter's Corner <nfb-krafters-korner at nfbnet.org>; National Association of Blind Students mailing list <nabs-l at nfbnet.org>; NFB Science and Engineering Division List <nfb-science at nfbnet.org>; NFB Talk Mailing List <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>; NFB History Support List <nfb-history at nfbnet.org>; Patrick Ireland <pyre77 at gmail.com>; Ray Feancois <rayfrancois1 at gmail.com>; Renee Squire <Renee.squier at state.or.us>; Rep Alonso Leon <Rep.TeresaAlonsoLeon at oregonlegislature.gov>; Shyamali Brooks <skyestar3 at gmail.com>; Sports and Recreation for the Blind Discussion List <sportsandrec at nfbnet.org>; Tech Talk <main at TechTalk.groups.io>; Tech Talk Chat <TechTalkChat at groups.io>; Lidless Eye <LidlessEye at groups.io>; The Chat Zone <the-chat-zone at groups.io>; The Tech Chat Zone <the-tech-zone at groups.io>; Tina Hansen <th404 at comcast.net>; V I Tech <Viptech at groups.io>; Writers' Division Mailing List <stylist at nfbnet.org>; X Rated Jokes <XRatedJokes at interconnected.groups.io>
Cc: Kendra Schaber <redwing731 at gmail.com>
Subject: [stylist] Fwd: [acb-chat] The Americans With Disabilities Act Is Under Attack in Congress - Rewire

Hi all! 
I recieved this and knew that I needed to pass this on. The message below effects everyone with a disability. 

Blessed be!!! 
Kendra Schaber
National Federation of the Blind
"When the student is ready, the teacher will appear" Author Unknown 

 Sent From My GMail EMail account On My IPhone SE. Typed to you with my Keys To Go blue tooth Keyboard, the only keyboard I know to work with an IPhone SE. 

Begin forwarded message:

> From: "Demaya, Diego via acb-chat" <acb-chat at acblists.org>
> Date: June 5, 2017 at 08:56:58 PDT
> To: "'General discussion list for ACB members and friends where a wide 
> range of topics from blindness to politics, issues of the day or 
> whatever comes to mind are welcome. This is a free form discussion 
> list.'" <acb-chat at acblists.org>, "acbt at groups.io" <acbt at groups.io>, 
> "hcb-l at yahoogroups.com" <hcb-l at yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: "Demaya, Diego" <Diego.Demaya at memorialhermann.org>
> Subject: [acb-chat] The Americans With Disabilities Act Is Under 
> Attack in Congress - Rewire
> Reply-To: "General discussion list for ACB members and friends where a 
> wide range of topics from blindness to politics, issues of the day or 
> whatever comes to mind are welcome. This is a free form discussion 
> list." <acb-chat at acblists.org>
> 
> The Americans With Disabilities Act Is Under Attack in Congress May 
> 30, 2017, 9:47am Robyn Powell
> 
> The House Judiciary Committee is currently considering imposing significant limitations to the ADA through the passage of the ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017.
> 
> Never in my life as a disabled woman have I been so terrified of losing my civil rights as I am now. 
> Shutterstock
> On July 26, 1990, George H.W. Bush signed the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) into law, proclaiming, “Let the shameful wall of exclusion finally come tumbling down!” Although I was only 8 years old, I still remember its passage and the increased accessibility that followed.
> 
> The ADA has both literally and figuratively opened countless doors for people like me, by requiring entities that are open to the public—such as restaurants, movie theaters, hospitals, hotels, and museums—be fully accessible to people with disabilities. The ADA also requires employers, as well as public and private entities, to provide reasonable accommodations to people with disabilities and prohibits discrimination based on disability.
> 
> Of course, passage of the ADA did not make ramps and elevators magically appear; nor did it immediately halt discrimination against people with disabilities. Progress takes time, which, as a wheelchair user, I have witnessed firsthand. Indeed, for several years after the law’s passage, my parents or I would always have to call places in advance to make sure that they were wheelchair accessible. For years, the answer was “no.” But times have changed, and now I no longer feel I need to take these extra steps before leaving my home. Nearly 27 years after the passage of the ADA, I now expect that all businesses will be accessible. And that is liberating.
> 
> While we surely have much further to go, the ADA has unequivocally led to much greater inclusion and accessibility and far less discrimination. Now, however, Congress is currently considering imposing significant limitations to the ADA through the passage of the ADA Education and Reform Act of 2017 (HR 620), sponsored by Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX).
> 
> Appreciate our work?
> 
> Rewire is a non-profit independent media publication. Your tax-deductible contribution helps support our research, reporting, and analysis.
> 
> DONATE NOW
> 
> Currently, if a person with a disability encounters an accessibility barrier at a business, they have two options: They can file a complaint with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which will investigate and decide if a violation has occurred. DOJ may enter into mediation with the person and the business, which is a low-cost approach to resolve ADA violations fairly quickly. DOJ may also sue the business on the person’s behalf. Alternatively, people with disabilities may file a lawsuit in court, bypassing DOJ altogether. The cornerstone of current enforcement options is that the violation can often be resolved swiftly.
> 
> If the ADA Education and Reform Act is passed, however, a person with a disability would be required to give a written notice to a business owner who has barriers to access. The business owner would then have 60 days to even acknowledge that there is a problem—and then another 120 days to make substantial progress toward correcting the violation. In other words, people with disabilities would be forced to wait 180 days to enforce their civil rights.
> 
> The ADA Education and Reform Act is premised on trying to curb “drive-by” ADA lawsuits: that is, frivolous lawsuits brought by attorneys alleging ADA violations. Surely, serial litigators, attorneys who simply bring lawsuits to line their pockets, must be stopped. However, these bills are not the solution.
> 
> To be fair, I vehemently oppose frivolous ADA lawsuits, where people seek to use the ADA for their own monetary gain. I cherish this law and hate hearing that some misuse it. However, it’s important to note that they are not as prevalent as some believe. An analysis of ADA lawsuits in 2016 identified just 12 individuals and one organization that have filed more than 100 lawsuits each. But frivolous lawsuits are not an ADA issue; they are a state and court problem. Indeed, ethics rules bar attorneys from bringing frivolous lawsuits. Rather than go after people with disabilities, attention should be focused on stopping these few bad attorneys.
> 
> Notably, passage of the ADA and ADA Amendments Act involved the disability community and bipartisan lawmakers working together with the business community. These “notification bills,” however, do not. Rather, they are the result of business owners and their lobbyists.
> 
> The disability community is not interested in more lawsuits; we simply want accessibility. There is no such thing as the “ADA police.” Enforcement depends on people with disabilities who know their rights to challenge violations. Filing lawsuits is timely and expensive. Finding an attorney that is knowledgeable about the ADA is very challenging. I say this because I believe it is fairly safe to assume that there are far more ADA violations occurring than we will ever hear of. As a disabled woman, I encounter violations daily.
> 
> Nevertheless, there’s a prevailing belief that ADA regulations are overly technical and most alleged violations are “minor.” The regulations concerning accessible parking spots are frequently used to demonstrate how ADA regulations are too specific. What opponents don’t understand is that the width of parking spaces matter for people with disabilities who drive, such as myself. I drive a wheelchair–accessible van. If someone parks too close, I am literally stuck because no one besides me can drive my van. This has happened to me more times than I count, leaving me stranded outside for hours, until the person returns to their car.
> 
> Throughout the years, based on a belief that the ADA is being abused and has become a money-maker, Congress has introduced a number of “notification bills.” These bills are problematic and have been strongly opposed by the disability community.
> 
> It is also important to dispel the myth that ADA lawsuits can be profitable for plaintiffs; that is plain wrong. When the ADA was being drafted, as a compromise between the business community and the disability community, the disability community gave up the option to obtain damages for a business’s failure to comply with the law by allowing only injunctive relief—meaning the business owner has to change their behavior—and attorneys’ fees.
> 
> Settlements or court orders that involve money damages for accessibility violations are based on state laws in a handful of states, not the ADA. Therefore, adding a notice requirement before people with disabilities can enforce their rights will do nothing to prevent businesses from being subjected to money damages. Moreover, if the accessibility violations in question are truly minor, as the proponents of these bills claim, it would not be difficult for businesses to fix the problem and resolve the issue quickly, with minimal attorneys’ fees. Hence, the issue is not an ADA one.
> 
> In addition, it’s important to recognize that the ADA includes several provisions that protect businesses from unreasonable requirements. For example, the ADA does not require any action that would cause an “undue burden” or that is “not readily achievable,” which is defined as “easily accomplished and able to be carried out without much difficulty or expense.”
> 
> Adding a notification requirement won’t make serial lawsuits go away. Instead, it simply sends the message to business owners that they don’t have to worry about complying with the ADA until they receive a letter notifying them that they are discriminating against people with disabilities. In other words, instead of complying, they can just “wait and see” if they are caught.
> 
> The imposition of a months-long “waiting period,” during which a business may continue to violate the law and deny access to people with disabilities once it has received a notice that it is violating the ADA, is simply not reasonable.
> 
> In short, the premise of bills like the ADA Education and Reform Act is that businesses should not be responsible for knowing their obligations to comply with a law that has been in effect for nearly three decades, but people with disabilities should instead be responsible not only for knowing the accessibility requirements of that law, but also for determining when a business is not in compliance and for knowing the specific requirements of the notice that they must provide.
> 
> Establishing and running a business involves compliance with numerous laws, including tax laws, property laws, health and safety laws, environmental laws, civil rights laws, and many others. Compliance with these legal obligations is part of the cost of doing business.
> 
> Business owners, and society as a whole, have had nearly 27 years to become aware of the ADA. Indeed, I would guess that every business owner knows at least one person with a disability and is at least vaguely aware that the ADA exists. Moreover, there are plenty of resources that provide information on ADA requirements to business owners. Indeed, the DOJ offers free technical assistance as well as several publicly available publications. In addition, there are ADA technical assistance centers across the country that offer information, guidance, and training on how to implement the ADA. There is simply no excuse for noncompliance at this point.
> 
> The bill is currently in the U.S. House Judiciary Committee; it has 18 co-sponsors. Never in my life as a disabled woman have I been so terrified of losing my civil rights as I am now. With the stroke of a pen, much that the disability community has fought hard for could be undone. What civil rights law will be on the chopping block next?
> 
_______________________________________________
Writers Division web site
http://writers.nfb.org/
stylist mailing list
stylist at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/stylist_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for stylist:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/stylist_nfbnet.org/bkpollpeter%40gmail.com