<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Maps. Maps. Maps.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">At least if the purpose is navigation. Models would have to be much larger to be actually useful for navigation, would take longer to create, be unwieldy, if not immobile.
I’m thinking of a model of a large building’s interior. It would have to be the size of a conference table probably, and how could it easily convey multiple floors? More time, more resources, more space, less utility than a map.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">And now I just saw matt’s comment about carrying multiple maps of different floors to navigate a building. That’s why I’d prefer a map over a model for navigation. I could
carry multiple tactile maps, but not a model. <o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">I think the model question is part of the “All the Light We Cannot See” syndrome. The blind girl memorizing everything from the model of her town doesn’t really convey well
what blind folks can effectively use. That part of the novel was the most frustrating to me because it carried with it a host of incorrect assumptions about blindness and blind people.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Models for other purposes, however, are incredibly cool. Matt has a model he built of the May D&F tower in down Denver. It’s a Denver architectural icon, and I wouldn’t
have a clue what it looked like without Matt’s model. But if I wanted to go there, I’d want a map.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">(smile)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif">Dan<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman",serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b>From:</b> TAGS <tags-bounces@nfbnet.org>
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Matthew Gesualdi via TAGS<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Thursday, March 31, 2022 8:42 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Tactile Art and Tactile Graphics Specialist list <tags@nfbnet.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Matthew Gesualdi <matt@tact-ed.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [TAGS] preferences for tactile models versus maps?<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Hi Cheryl, <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-margin-top-alt:0in;margin-right:0in;margin-bottom:12.0pt;margin-left:.5in">
When you say maps versus models, are you thinking that models would have more height to walls and built-in features as opposed to maps being more like low bas reliefs? <o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Matt Gesualdi <br>
Tact-Ed.org<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">On Mar 31, 2022 3:00 AM, Cheryl Fogle-Hatch via TAGS <<a href="mailto:tags@nfbnet.org">tags@nfbnet.org</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC 1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Hello everyone.<br>
<br>
I was asked if blind people prefer tactile maps or tactile models when<br>
seeking information about navigating a building. I'm thinking this<br>
might be a personal preference, but I'm curious about different ideas.<br>
Does anyone know of research into this topic?<br>
<br>
Thanks in advance.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Cheryl Fogle-Hatch, Ph.D.<br>
Archaeologist and Museum Professional<br>
(443) 939-8217<br>
<a href="mailto:c.k.fogle@gmail.com">c.k.fogle@gmail.com</a><br>
<a href="https://museumsenses.org">https://museumsenses.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pub/cheryl-fogle-hatch">https://www.linkedin.com/pub/cheryl-fogle-hatch</a><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
TAGS mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:TAGS@nfbnet.org">TAGS@nfbnet.org</a><br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/tags_nfbnet.org">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/tags_nfbnet.org</a><br>
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for TAGS:<br>
<a href="http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/tags_nfbnet.org/matt%40tact-ed.org">http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/tags_nfbnet.org/matt%40tact-ed.org</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>