<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17107" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>This pulic comment is in response to the messages
and communications I have<BR>received urging me to apologize for my vocalness
during the Mark<BR>Rothenhauser case portion of yesterday's meeting.<BR>I feel
no obligation to apologize for my vocal and public action during the<BR>meeting
in vigorous advocacy for the Board hearing the truth about the<BR>corruption
involved in the presentation of the documents considered by the<BR>Board, and
publicly used byJohn Scott to trash Mark Rothenhauser, and<BR>attempt to deflect
or shift the blame and burden of proof to Mark,and using<BR>documents that were
never introduced at the hearing, orI defeated their<BR>admission to the record
by my vigorous volunteer representation and advocacy<BR>for the truth, at a
disadvantage, caused by James Hull, Constance Zanger,<BR>Pat Cannon, the
conspiring corrupt Administrative law judge's refusal to<BR>provide documents in
a format usable to me and my licensee client, and I am<BR>forced to show up at
hearings with a reader I pay out-of-pocket because I<BR>know the materials used
in a hearing presented by theMCB SLA will continue<BR>to not be provided
in a format that is usable to defend my client from the<BR>failure of program
staff to do their mandated job, and their corrupt illegal<BR>acts, while they
get taxpayer paid readers to advance their corruption.<BR>despite the
overwhelming evidence I have exposed, or have attempted to<BR>expose publicly
and otherwise in writing, only to have that evidence ignored<BR>or further
shoved under the carpet. And I am to be concerned or worry
about<BR>Credibility? And I am expected to sit back silently, while the
exposed and<BR>documented corruption, favortism, and pay-offs continue for some,
while the<BR>lives of other blind persons are literally destroyed? Not to
mention the<BR>enhancement of the lives of sighted persons at the expense of
blind persons.<BR> it serves no noble cause or justice
to arrive at the correct result for<BR>the wrong reason, while ignoring or
turning a Pat Cannon eye to the<BR>corruption underlying the continued injustice
that violate the basic and<BR>fundamental due process rights of any citizen and
literally destoy the lives<BR>and livelihood of so many blind persons as I have
seen done over the last<BR>four years, by the corrupt actions by Constance
Zanger, James Hull, Pat<BR>Cannon, Leamon Jones, and their conspiring uncle Tom
blind persons who<BR>benefit financially, sexually, and through the
protections corruptly<BR>granted them when they don't follow the exact same
rules that are<BR>selectively enforced by the persons named and unnamed
above.<BR>The showdown with John Scott could have been easily avoided, since
I<BR>requested a recognizable "Point of Order" having to do exactly to the
advive<BR>formerly advised by Tom Warren to the Board having to do a complete
and<BR>record being before the Board before even considering and deliberating on
a<BR>case. I simply attempted with my valid "Point of Order" request
and<BR>subsequent comments were to simply point out that of the 14
documents<BR>presented to the Board via email by Sue Luzenski, documents six,
eight,<BR>eleben, twelve, and thirteen were never part of the official record,
and<BR>further, the email that was repeatedly referenced and used byJohn
Scott to<BR>publicly trash) Mark Rothenhauser was obtained through ex
parte<BR>communication frome BEP, admitted under the discretionary
authority of the<BR>administrative law judge.<BR>Hhow many times does it take
for a case to come before the MCB Board to get<BR>the facts and truth on the
tableto stare in the face of the Commissioners?<BR>I assure this no sick Polish
joke or trick question. And the answer should<BR>be very obvious-the anser
should be obvious-once and only one time. But<BR>recent history shows that
is not the case. . The truth must come out, be<BR>recognized by the
Board, and dealt with the Boars about the corruption that<BR>occurred in the
Rothenhauser case, and it will be done either through<BR>further administrative
means or through litigation that the the Board will<BR>be forced to address and
deal with the consequences of such rights<BR>enforcement and corruption by the
agency staff once again. So when all is<BR>said and done, and the fallout
is dealt with the Board, I am confident it<BR>will be my vocal action at the
meeting to get to the truth will ultimately<BR>be recognized and judged as
correct, and will further be seen as an attempt<BR>to protect the integrity and
street "creibility" of the Boar, which I<BR>strongly sought to do, only to be
threatened by John Scott to act agains my<BR>client because of my insistence for
incorporation of the truth. I frankly<BR>don't care about my credibility
because I know in my heart what I do and<BR>speak seeks to get to the truth, is
my divinely inspired mission, and is<BR>solely designed to bring about good over
evil, and if Jesus could accept the<BR>will of our Father, endure and overcome
the brutal pain and death of the<BR>cross for me, then I can endure what I must,
as I am called to follow in His<BR>ways. Jesus was seen during his life as
a rebel and judged harshly for his<BR>search and demonstration for the truth
thruth his words and actions, so I<BR>have a great role model to follow and
guide me without worry about my street<BR>cred here on earth. And yet, you
and the other Commissioners can relax in<BR>the comfort that I don't see myself
angrily overturning tables as Jesus did<BR>to get to the Truth! So put
away the proposal for bullet-proof table<BR>skirting and and security
rent-a-cops. And given my client service record<BR>with MCB, I doubt that
Voc. Rehab will pay for me to attend the marksmanship<BR>training at
MCBTC. Oh silly me, I forgot that was abolished as<BR>inappropriate for we
the blind.<BR>Unfortunately, there is an attempt by the Board to appear so fair
and<BR>uninfluenced by any party in any given case, that a common sense approach
to<BR>get to the truth is totally thrown out the window, only to have the
entire<BR>process coming crashing to the street or sidewalk, guaranteeing injury
to<BR>innocent bystanders.<BR> How many times must I state I'd much rather
be using my time and talents<BR>to be assisting operators with their business
success, over revealing the<BR>corrupt, evil motives of incompentent staff and
administrative hearings<BR>system, which to date nobody wants to confront and
address. Believe me, I<BR>do not see my role as us against the Board-we
should be partners on the same<BR>page toward thruth in action, the same way we
on the Ad Hoc Committee is<BR>functioning so well as partners within a
process. The contempt toward me<BR>and others like Hazell must be curbed,
if we are to survive as a viable<BR>agency serving the needs of blind persons,
rather than the agendas of<BR>sighted staff an other sighted persons.<BR>Terry
D. Eagle<BR>(517) 372-7552<BR></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>