[blindlaw] Using discovery from other countries?

[Michael Fry]

Yes, they'd at least consider accepting it.  Only relevant evidence is
admissible.  Relevant evidence is any thing that tends to prove a material
fact in the case more likely than not.  Or something along those lines at
least.

On another note, why did I do this stupid LLM program?  I'll tell you the
reason, it was because I couldn't get a good job.  It's awful.  Oh well.

On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:01 PM, E.J. Zufelt <everett at zufelt.ca> wrote:

> Good evening,
>
> Not being a lawyer and having never taken a course in evidence, please
> forgive any ignorance in the following question.
>
> Based on a hypothetical situation, would a U.S. court be generally willing
> to accept evidence that was obtained through the process of discovery in a
> legal proceeding in another country?
>
> Thanks,
> Everett
>
> Follow me on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/ezufelt
>
> View my LinkedIn Profile
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/ezufelt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mikefry79%40gmail.com
>