[blindlaw] nfb v. target

Sun Mar 15 06:02:14 UTC 2009

This is off topic, please stop.  You may feel the 
way you do, and that is fine, but it has noting 
to do with the law and blindness, so is off topic for this list.

David Andrews, Moderator

At 12:41 PM 3/14/2009, you wrote:
>I understand that, however, I just do not agree 
>with the entire concept of awarding damages in this sort of case.
>Steve
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Rod Alcidonis" <roddj12 at hotmail.com>
>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 9:27 AM
>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] nfb v. target
>
>
>
>    Steve:
>
>The effort here was to try to help your understanding and educate your
>logic, not to justify the existence of the legal system. I am afraid that
>you are still not willing to accept that "damage" as used in the law is a
>term of art. Meaning, It has a specific legal definition different from
>normal use. It is different when you say that "my bicycle was damaged, for
>example. It is a legal recognition that certain harms should be compensated.
>In this case, the plaintiffs are being paid not for the fact that they were
>physically damage in the normal use of the term, but for violations of their
>civil rights. See Denis' e-mail for what the harm was.
>
>In the bicycle example, if someone were to break your bicycle, you can
>receive "damages" as the cost of repair, or replacement of the bicycle. By
>the way, you are also entitled to enforce your civil rights if you so choose
>and receive damages.
>
>Not every violations entitle someone to such remedy. When a person cannot
>get damages under the law, that person has the option of seeking  equitable
>relief in the form of an injunction or restraining order against the
>defendant. In this case damages was available as a remedy so the plaintiffs
>are getting money. They are getting paid because their civil rights were
>violated. I hope this further helps inform your comments.
>
>Take care.
>
>Rod Alcidonis
>Juris Doctor Candidate, 2009.
>Roger Williams University School of Law
>10 Metacom Ave., Box: 9003
>Bristol, RI 02809
>Cell: 718-704-4651
>Home: 401-824-8685
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve P. 
>Deeley" <stevep.deeley at insightbb.com>
>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 9:22 PM
>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] nfb v. target
>
>
>That is a lawyer talking who makes his living in rediculous situations like
>this one.  Again, you show me how an individual was damaged and out
>$4,000.00.
>Steve
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott C. 
>LaBarre" <slabarre at labarrelaw.com>
>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 5:38 PM
>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] nfb v. target
>
>
>Violation of civil rights has long been recognized as a form of compensible
>legal damage as well it should be.
>Scott C. LaBarre, Esq.
>
>LaBarre Law Offices P.C.
>1660 South Albion Street, Ste. 918
>Denver, Colorado 80222
>303 504-5979 (voice)
>303 757-3640 (fax)
>slabarre at labarrelaw.com (e-mail)
>www.labarrelaw.com (website)
>
>CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message may contain confidential and privileged
>information. If you are not the designated recipient, you may not read,
>copy, distribute or retain this message. If you received this message in
>error, please notify the sender at 303) 504-5979 or slabarre at labarrelaw.com,
>and destroy and delete it from your system. This message and any attachments
>are covered by the Electronic
>Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521.
>----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve P. 
>Deeley" <stevep.deeley at insightbb.com>
>To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 2:31 PM
>Subject: Re: [blindlaw] nfb v. target
>
>
>>This is ridiculous!  How were these people damaged?
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "Mehgan Sidhu" <ms at browngold.com>
>>To: <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
>>Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 3:20 PM
>>Subject: [blindlaw] nfb v. target
>>
>>
>>>To answer the recent questions posted about the Target case, the final
>>>settlement hearing took place on March 9th.  I understand from our
>>>counsel in California, Larry Paradis of DRA and Josh Konecky, that there
>>>were no objectors and the Judge was pleased with the resolution of the
>>>case.   The settlement is not fully "final" until the time for any
>>>appeals has run - which is about 30 days.  Given there were no objectors,
>>>it is highly unlikely that any appeals will be filed.  The judge has not
>>>yet made a ruling on attorneys fees, but that will not hold up
>>>enforcement of the settlement.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>As for disbursements, assuming there are no appeals, the claims
>>>administer has 45 days from the final approval date to disburse funds to
>>>claimants. I do not know the final tally of approved claimants, though I
>>>think there were several hundred.  I will pass that information along
>>>when I have it.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>We will now be working on enforcing the settlement commitments that
>>>Target made with respect to the accessibility of the website.
>>>
>>>
>>>Mehgan Sidhu
>>>Brown, Goldstein & Levy, LLP
>>>120 East Baltimore Street, Suite 1700
>>>Baltimore, Maryland 21202
>>>410-962-1030 x1324
>>>410-385-0869 (fax)
>>>ms at browngold.com<mailto:ms at browngold.com>
>>>www.browngold.com<http://www.browngold.com/>
>>>
>>>Confidentiality Notice
>>>
>>>This e-mail may contain confidential information that may also be legally
>>>privileged and that is intended only for the use of the addressee(s)
>>>named above.  If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized
>>>agent of the recipient, please be advised that any dissemination or
>>>copying of this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance on the
>>>information contained herein, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
>>>received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by use of the
>>>reply button, and then delete the e-mail from your system.  Thank you!
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>blindlaw mailing list
>>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>>blindlaw:
>>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/stevep.deeley%40insightbb.com
>>
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>No virus found in this incoming message.
>>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/1999 - Release Date: 03/13/09
>>05:59:00
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>blindlaw mailing list
>>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>blindlaw:
>>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/slabarre%40labarrelaw.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>blindlaw:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/stevep.deeley%40insightbb.com
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.11.13/1999 - Release Date: 03/13/09
>05:59:00
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>blindlaw:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/roddj12%40hotmail.com
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get 
>your account info for blindlaw:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/stevep.deeley%40insightbb.com
>
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 
>270.11.13/2001 - Release Date: 03/14/09 06:54:00
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindlaw mailing list
>blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get 
>your account info for blindlaw:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dandrews%40visi.com
>