[blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case

[AZNOR99 at aol.com]

As I understand it,  a written opinion has not yet been  issued.  The judge 
indicated that the National Conference of Bar Examiners  violated 
Stephanie's rights by refusing to allow her to use the technology of  her choice to 
take the Multiple Choice Section of the Bar Exam.  I was not  present at the 
ruling, I only heard Dr. Maurer discuss it this morning.
 
Congratulations, Stephanie!  This has been a long time coming, and  
hopefully all blind lawyers will now be able to use the accommodations they deem  
necessary in all future Bar Examinations.
 
Ronza
 
 
 
In a message dated 1/30/2010 8:03:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
joltingjacksandefur at gmail.com writes:

Hey, I  am unable to open this attachment. What is this rulling? And where 
can I  find it on Line? RJ
----- Original Message ----- 
From:  <ckrugman at sbcglobal.net>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List"  <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2010 5:47  AM
Subject: [blindlaw] favorable ruling in Enyart case


>  _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing  list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
>  blindlaw:
>  http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/o
ptions/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joltingjacksandefur%40gmail.com
>  


_______________________________________________
blindlaw  mailing  list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To  unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for  
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aznor99%40aol.com