[blindlaw] FW: Law Schools Sued by Us

Chris Danielsen cdanielsen8 at aol.com
Fri Jun 11 02:04:37 UTC 2010


Please feel free to distribute the press release to whomever you feel should
see it for whatever reason.

Chris
 

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Cathryn Bonnette
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 4:31 AM
To: 'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] FW: Law Schools Sued by Us

Noel or Listers, 

Question: Is permission required to reference/quote the article below?

I am communicating with a contact in the civil rights division of the DOJ
this morning concerning access problems that blind applicants for federal
jobs are experiencing due to inaccessibility of the web page and on line
application system for applicants who use JAWS, or similar speech software.

I would prefer to send the message today to expedite corrective actions.
Please advise whether consent is needed and/or an appropriate contact person
to provide permission if needed. Please respond today, 6/10/10.
If a telephone call is easier for you, feel free to call my cell any time
today: 202-744-4800.

Thank you in advance for any assistance you may be able to provide with this
effort to expand federal employment opportunities for blind persons.

Best,

Cathryn Bonnette

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Nightingale, Noel
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:55 PM
To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Law Schools Sued by Us



-----Original Message-----
From: nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbwatlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Prows, Bennett (HHS/OCR)
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:48 AM
To: NFB of Washington Talk Mailing List
Subject: [nfbwatlk] Law Schools Sued by Us

Listers,

 

FYI, the below is another example of why the NFB.

 

/s/

 

Bennett Prows

 

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

 

CONTACT:

 

Chris Danielsen

 

Director of Public Relations 

 

National Federation of the Blind

 

(410) 659-9314, extension 2330

 

(410) 262-1281 (Cell)

 

cdanielsen at nfb.org  

 

Law Schools Discriminate Against Blind ApplicantsNational Federation of the
Blind Files Suit Against Four California Law Schools 

 

San Francisco, California (June 9, 2010): The National Federation of the
Blind (NFB), the nation's oldest and largest organization of blind people,
and

three blind students who have applied or are considering applying to law
school in California-Deepa Goraya, Bruce J. Sexton, and Claire Stanley-filed
an

amended lawsuit yesterday against the Law School Admissions Council and four
California law schools for violating provisions of the California Disabled

Persons Act, the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Americans with Disabilities
Act.  The suit was filed because the law schools require or encourage
applicants

to use a centralized Internet-based application process provided by the Law
School Admissions Council (LSAC) through its Web site (

www.lsac.org

) that is inaccessible to blind law school applicants.  Blind students must
seek sighted assistance to use the LSAC system.  Furthermore, blind law
school

applicants cannot perform other tasks on the LSAC Web site, such as
downloading official study materials for the Law School Admissions Test
(LSAT) that

is required by almost all U.S. law schools.  The four law schools are:
University of California Hastings College of the Law, Thomas Jefferson
School of

Law, Whittier Law School, and Chapman University School of Law.   

 

Blind people access Web sites on computers equipped with screen access
software that converts what is on the screen into synthesized speech or
Braille. 

The keyboard is used instead of a mouse to navigate the Web site and click
on selected links or buttons.  If a Web site is improperly coded, however,
blind

computer users cannot access or interact with the site.  The law school
applications available on lsac.org are completely inaccessible to screen
readers,

requiring blind users to resort to sighted assistance in order to complete
their law school applications.  In addition, the practice tests and
preparation

materials for the LSAT are not available in an electronic format that is
accessible to blind computer users.  

 

Dr. Marc Maurer, President of the National Federation of the Blind,
said: "The National Federation of the Blind demands that those who control
admission

to the practice of law obey the law.  For too long, blind people have
experienced barriers to entering the legal profession, despite a long
history of

success and distinguished service by blind attorneys and judges.  The
National Federation of the Blind will not sit quietly while the LSAC
willfully refuses

to provide the same services to blind people seeking admission to law school
that it does to the sighted.  The LSAC is engaging in blatant discrimination

against the blind and we will not stand for it.  Since all of the schools
named in our amended complaint either require or strongly encourage
applicants

to use the inaccessible LSAC application system, they too are actively
discriminating against blind applicants and we will ask the courts to hold
them

responsible for doing so."   

 

The National Federation of the Blind and Ms. Goraya originally filed suit
against the LSAC for its inaccessible Web site in February of 2009.
The complaint

filed today amends that action.  The National Federation of the Blind
recently filed complaints with the United States Department of Justice
against nine

other law schools across the United States that use the LSAC online
application system.  The Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department is
investigating

those complaints.   

 

Plaintiffs are represented in this matter by Daniel F. Goldstein and Mehgan
Sidhu of the Baltimore firm Brown, Goldstein, and Levy; Laurence W. Paradis,

Anna Levine, and Karla Gilbride of the Berkley firm Disability Rights
Advocates; and Scott C. LaBarre of the Denver firm LaBarre Law Offices.


 

###  

 

_______________________________________________
nfbwatlk mailing list
nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nfbwatlk:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org/noel.nightingale%4
0ed.gov

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cathrynisfinally%4
0verizon.net
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.437 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2926 - Release Date: 06/09/10
06:35:00


_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cdanielsen8%40aol.
com

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5188 (20100610) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com


 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 5188 (20100610) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 





More information about the BlindLaw mailing list