[Blindmath] Mathematical document accessibility

P. R. Stanley prstanley at ntlworld.com
Sat Mar 14 02:55:07 UTC 2009


That's true, Jason, we have had this discussion several times yet it 
seems our efforts to highlight the benefits of LaTeX aren't bearing any fruit.

I think it'd be easier to persuade the previous U.S. republican 
administration to join the taliban.
>P. R. Stanley <prstanley at ntlworld.com> wrote:
> > I disagree! LaTeX isn't just for typesetting maths. Learning LaTeX would
> > allow you the freedom to typeset professional quality documents without
> > having to shell out hundreds on a less than accessible editor.
>
>We've had this discussion before on the list, where it was pointed out that
>LaTeX can be used as a better alternative to word processors for a wide
>variety of documents. This is why there are LaTeX styles for everything from
>post cards, to resumes, reports, articles, books and so on.
>
>After making the switch to LaTeX, I didn't need a word processor anymore.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Blindmath mailing list
>Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>for Blindmath:
>http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/prstanley%40ntlworld.com





More information about the BlindMath mailing list