[humanser] Greetings

Mon Dec 8 02:19:17 UTC 2014

Hi all,

I know I have not participated in discussion on this list for some
time now as I've been pretty busy with school and other NFB work, but
I would like to add my two cents for what it is worth.

As a student who is going into a wholistic profession (music therapy)
I see a huge need for inclusion in some sort of NFB division.  The
needs of those who wish to enter expressive art therapies, massage
therapy, recreation therapy, etc, are in very ;unique positions.  In
trying to figure out some of my own issues towards earning my degree,
I've had a significant amount of difficulty in tracking down blind
professionals in my field.  Those who have been tracked down are all
older, and have not been trained under the same standards which I am
being trained under, which are more rigorous and specific.  I also
have yet to meet any blind person, student or professional, in art
therapy, dance therapy, drama therapy, or recreation therapy.  In
fact, I don't know any professionals with disabilities in these fields
at all.  I also see that there are systemic issues at least in music
therapy with professors not understanding how to accommodate students
with disabilities in regards to the professional competencies we have
to abide by.  I can't speak for the qualifications of other expressive
therapy professions, but I wonder if these newer professions, which
were formed out of the desire to help people with disabilities by
non-disabled people who didn't think those who they served would
someday end up serving others in vulnerable populations, have this
problem in common.

This group has been a big support to me in figuring out things like
how to read client affect, how to address non-verbal communication and
silence (even though I didn't ask about it, that lengthy thread was
extremely useful to me), etc.  However, I sometimes feel like since
the group is primarily made up of psychologists, socialworkers, and
other mental health-specific professions and music therapy follows a
broader approach to treatment, some of the things I ask on here as
well as the music-specific groups are tricky for others to answer.  I
am completely in agreement that the mind, body, and spirit for those
who choose to be spiritual or religious are very connected, and I
anticipate continued membership in the Human Services Division, but I
do think forming a separate medical professionals division or one for
health care professionals which would include wholistic professions
would be a better fit for some of the issues that face people in these
fields.

For example, I really want to work in a pediatric hospital.  I love
kids, and being able to work with a wide variety of populations and be
flexible is truly exciting for me.  One of my professors isn't
convinced this will be possible for me, as I don't have the capability
of reading monitors.  I have told her I know how to take a pulse, and
could listen to breathing which is a very obvious indicator of
respiration rate as well as the person's state of alertness (they'll
sigh more or have slower breathing if they're tired), but she doesn't
seem convinced.  I'd love to see what others have done in this
situation while working in the medical setting.

I honestly don't know how many blind people are in the medical field
now, or who are in the wholistic therapies, but I think at least a
separate list should be formed for them if not a group or division.
It is quite possible that, especially for those in wholistic
professions, that people will find themselves in multiple groups and
divisions to address all their needs (E.G, Human Services, Performers
Division/Musicians Groups, and Health Care Professionals for a music
therapy student).

Just my thoughts.

On 12/7/14, Marion Gwizdala via humanser <humanser at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> Doug,
>
> 	I believe the question is not whether to include the health
> professions on this list; rather it is whether to include them in the
> membership of the division. As per your message, though, the common
> challenges faced by both the mental & physical health professions are very
> similar. Both need access to Electronic Health Records, both need
> accessible
> professional examinations, and both need greater employment opportunities.
> I
> am of the opinion that the Division would be strengthened by including the
> physical health professions in our division. These professionals have no
> division to represent their needs at this time and blind people are
> underrepresented in the field. If there does come a time when the division
> has a sufficient number of those in the health professions, then it might
> make sense for them to form their own division, should this be in their
> best
> interest. This is what happened with the Rehabilitaition Counseling
> Division. It was once a part of the Human Services Division until their
> numbers grew and it was necessary to form a separate division in order to
> focus more attention on that specific field.
>
> Fraternally yours,
> Marion Gwizdala
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: humanser [mailto:humanser-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Doug Lee
> via humanser
> Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 11:23 AM
> To: Merry Schoch; Human Services Division Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [humanser] Greetings
>
> I don't presume to vote, being neither a Division member nor a member of
> the
> field (I'm here out of interest in it though); but I'll speak in case my
> thoughts are useful...
>
> We decide, in the NFB, when and whether to coalesce with other
> organizations
> based on commonality of goals and beliefs, which really amounts to deciding
> based on commonality of focus.
>
> So my question would be, how common would the focuses be of a group
> dedicated to human services versus one dedicated to health care?
>
> Examples of focus I can imagine, for a mailing list, would include
> - Info on how and where to get work.
> - Struggles with accessibility of specific software packages.
> - Access to literature related to the field (DSM for HS).
> - And of course, division business discussions.
>
> This is certainly not an exhaustive list.
>
> My point is to suggest deciding this question, whether to join or split the
> two aims, based on consideration of what specific sorts of traffic will be
> generated by each.
>
> And since I'm not in the field myself, I have more questions than
> answers...
>
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2014 at 08:48:04AM -0500, Merry Schoch via humanser wrote:
> Greetings to All Listserv Members,
>
>
>
> Not sure if you notice a pattern, but the majority of messages from me are
> sent out on Sunday mornings as this is my most peaceful time of the week.
> My thoughts swirl around the Human Services Division and the tasks to do.
> Admittedly, there are many times I feel more than overwhelmed and wonder if
> our goals are obtainable.  Then the essence of who I am speaks loudly and
> reminds me this type of thinking will accomplish nothing.
>
>
>
> The Board of the Division will meet privately during the month of December.
> Unlike most meetings this will not be open for membership involvement, but
> I
> will present to our members and listserv the plans so you are informed.
> One of the topics at our meeting is a name change for the division.
>
>
>
> I would like to get immediate feedback from this list an our members
> regarding a name change for the division.  While I attended  the "Leaders
> and Ledgers" seminar at the Jernigan Institute, someone repeatedly referred
> to the division as the "Health and Human Services Division".  Since I have
> received quite a few inquiries from individuals who are seeking to go into
> the medical field and there is currently no division for medical
> professionals, I thought I would put the idea out to you all.  It brings
> more diversity to our division which we have a great deal of now; however,
> physical and mental health (in my opinion) are interconnected on many
> levels.
>
>
>
> Please respond to your thoughts on the name change.  It will mean a
> Constitutional  change and I am seeking input before we go further with the
> idea.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Merry C. Schoch
>
> NFB Human  Services Division
>
> President
>
>
>
> Merry C. Schoch, MSW ISW#6961
>
> Professional Social Worker/Counselor
>
> (813) 523-6573
>
> Merryschoch at verizon.net
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: The information transmitted, including attachments,
> is
> intended only for the person(s) or entity to which it is addressed and may
> contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review,
> retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon
> this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and
> destroy any copies of this information.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/dgl%40dlee.org
>
> --
> Doug Lee                 dgl at dlee.org                http://www.dlee.org
> SSB BART Group           doug.lee at ssbbartgroup.com
> http://www.ssbbartgroup.com
> "I before E, except after C, or when sounded like A, as in neighbor and
> weigh, except for when weird foreign concierges seize neither leisure nor
> science from the height of society."
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/marion.gwizdala%40veri
> zon.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> humanser mailing list
> humanser at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/humanser_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> humanser:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/humanser_nfbnet.org/crazy4clarinet104%40gmail.com
>

-- 
Kaiti