[nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..

[Mike Freeman]

That presumes that diversity always equals benefit.  You and I are going to
have to differ on this one.

Mike


-----Original Message-----
From: nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nabs-l-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
Of Jedi
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2011 6:45 PM
To: nabs-l at nfbnet.org
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] If the World Went Sighted..

I say that disability is a form of diversity, so I wouldn't want to erase
it.

Respectfully,
Jedi

Original message:
> Hello all,

> This is an interesting discussion, so I thought I'd pop in for a minute.

> This question goes, at the root of it, to how you view disability. If 
> you view it as an aspect that creates diversity, then erasing it would 
> be like erasing races or different languages. If you view disability 
> as a disease, then logically the first response would be to want to cure
it.

> What do you guys think?

> Briley
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:55 AM, Jorge Paez wrote:

>> Arielle:
>> I think blindness does play a roll--in that it is just one of many 
>> things that make up an individual, and in a world where genetics 
>> would be preprogramed, it just be too perfect.
>> It'd just bee too flawless--too artificial.
>> I'm sure some people would want it--but a world in which blindness 
>> and other disabilities are completely eradicated would just be too 
>> artificial, almost like we literally managed to create our own world in a
way.

>> Worse, it would make it a whole lot worse for any blind who were born 
>> cause then everyone would consider them a scientific failure so to speak.
>> Of course,
>> I'm hypothetically talking about a very cold  world in which science 
>> would create people which I hope would never happen but its a good 
>> talking  point anyway.

>> Jorge


>> On Apr 27, 2011, at 12:08 AM, Arielle Silverman wrote:

>>> Hi all,

>>> We recently had a discussion about how we would react if some of our 
>>> blind friends could become sighted, and we asked whether it would be 
>>> reasonable for a sighted person to want to go blind. This made me 
>>> think of an interesting, although a bit painful, question:
>>> Would the world be better off, worse off, or about the same if 
>>> blindness were completely eradicated, through genetic engineering 
>>> and/or mandatory treatment of all causes of blindness?
>>> The question may sound silly, but for many vision researchers, 
>>> eradication of blindness is a real goal. But does the presence of 
>>> blind people in our society have any benefit to the society or the 
>>> world as a whole?

>>> Certainly there are costs of having a small group of people in 
>>> society who read and travel using different techniques than the 
>>> rest. These specialized techniques have to be taught, technology has 
>>> to be adapted to their use and negative public attitudes prevent 
>>> this minority of people who do things differently from having full 
>>> access to societal goods and opportunities. So would it be cheaper 
>>> and less resource-demanding if everybody could use the same visual 
>>> techniques to accomplish life tasks?
>>> On the other hand, you could perhaps argue that having people who 
>>> use different senses to do things in society is advantageous. 
>>> Technology is forced to innovate to become usable by those who don't 
>>> have vision as well as those who do. And conceivably, if a darkness 
>>> plague struck the planet, it would be better for the species if some 
>>> of its members could fully function without light.

>>> What do you think? Should we as a society make an effort to get rid 
>>> of blindness? Or does blindness serve any kind of social function?
>>> There obviously isn't a right answer here, but it's something that, 
>>> for better or for worse, could become relevant to us someday.

>>> Arielle

>>> _______________________________________________
>>> nabs-l mailing list
>>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/computertech
>>> jorgepaez%40gmail.com


>> _______________________________________________
>> nabs-l mailing list
>> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/brileyp%40gma
>> il.com


> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/loneblindjedi%
> 40samobile.net

--
Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.


_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
nabs-l:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com