[nabs-l] NABS List Manners

Karl Martin Adam kmaent1 at gmail.com
Sat Aug 16 15:19:39 UTC 2014


I really don't think that "just delete what you don't want" is a 
sufficient response to women being sexually harassed by guys 
doing things like trying to trade tech help for a bra size.  It 
is our responsibility as members of this list and the 
responsibility of the moderators to ensure that this is a safe 
place where people can post without being harassed.  Maybe we 
can't get rid of this sort of thing completely, but that's no 
reason to tolerate this when it's brought to our attention.

 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Littlefield, Tyler via nabs-l" <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
To: Kaiti Shelton <crazy4clarinet104 at gmail.com>, National 
Association of Blind Students mailing list <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Sat, 16 Aug 2014 00:21:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [nabs-l] NABS List Manners

Hello:
I think this thread has gone on way to long. Firstly, the guy 
asked her
bra size off list and she replied on list. Maybe it was not 
appropriate,
but welcome to the internets in 2014. Just delete what you don't 
want.

Second, you're talking about these emails for social networks 
like it's
a huge issue. Maybe there are a few guys out there friending any 
girl
with an email address, but usually what happens is they reply, 
then they
say "here Facebook have my address book" and bam, everyone gets
invitations. whether or not the person ment to send them.

I don't know that holding confirence calls really is the way to 
go, just
send out rule reminders every month and if there's a problem, 
just send
it off to the admins to deal with as they see fit. Confirence 
calls,
classes, talks, required agreements and the like are just going 
to be
ignored by those who don't care and acknowledged for those who 
already
acknowledge them. Forcing someone to say "I agree" to the rules 
is just
forcing them to go through another step to register and they can 
still
say "hey, I didn't read those rules." This also ends up taking a 
bit of
extra work to embed in mailman, as I don't think it has this 
option. You
do have the option of sending out monthly emails or welcome 
letters, at
which point you could include rules, then failure to follow them 
can be
the same results as not following the rules you have to click a 
button
to agree, whatever that may be.

I think this is getting blown out of perportion. There are spats 
on and
off list, but if you really have a problem with someone just 
block them
or hit delete on their messages.
On 8/16/2014 12:10 AM, Kaiti Shelton via nabs-l wrote:
 It would also be great if somehow, we could address the issue of
 people taking advantage of the fact that other list members 
can't
 necessarily be anonymous and hide their emails to avoid unwanted
 attention off-list.  I know policing such matters is 
impractical, but
 it is also kind of weird to have NABS members who I don't know
 practically stalking me because they want me to follow them back 
on
 Twitter, want to be a friend on facebook, want to be a 
connection or
 in my circle on Linked In or Google Plus, etc, plus send random 
emails
 to my address asking sometimes really odd questions.  I think 
people
 would be less likely to jump the gun when inappropriate behavior
 happens on list and more apt to handle it appropriately if 
things like
 this didn't happen, as I know they happen to a fair number of 
people
 on the list.  Would it be too much to put a guideline in which 
says
 something about how permission should be gained before sending a
 messages of a personal nature off list, or please don't friend 
someone
 on other social media outlets unless there is a mutual desire to 
be
 friends?  Or, perhaps in addition to internet etiquette 
guidelines,
 there be some basic social guidelines in case some of this 
behavior is
 due to a lack of social supports outside of the internet, and 
the
 person for whatever reasons needs a bit of guidance in how to 
properly
 correspond with others so as not to come off overbearing.

 The bigger question is, how could this realistically be done 
without
 severely limiting intellectual conversation.  Over the last few 
years
 I've gotten some very nice emails from people who wanted to 
respond to
 something I said privately, to give an honest opinion that they 
were
 too shy to put on the list for the very reason that they thought 
they
 would meet resistance or disapproval, or people who noticed 
things
 like my major and were curious for information.  I wouldn't want 
to
 stifle any of these things and have actually made some good 
friends
 through some of these conversations which happened thanks to the 
NABS
 list, but it is a little weird, annoying, and a bit creepy, when 
some
 random guy won't stop sending me reminders to add him on 
different
 social media outlets, especially when they're ones I don't check 
or
 didn't really care to learn how to use after deciding I really 
didn't
 need the account, and they won't get the hint that I'm either 
not
 checking my account, am only still receiving their invitations 
because
 I haven't figured out how to block them on a site I never use, 
or am
 not interested in adding a stranger to see my personal 
information.  I
 think that is a huge problem we have with the list, and 
especially
 puts a lot of the girls on here into a tricky spot because since 
this
 is all electronic, to engage by telling the person to leave you 
alone
 gives them what they want.  I used the delete key a lot for 
dealing
 with these kinds of messages, but found with some the emails 
just keep
 coming even after 2 years of membership on the list.

 On 8/15/14, Kaiti Shelton <crazy4clarinet104 at gmail.com> wrote:
 I like Jedi's idea of having a conference call on internet 
etiquette,
 but my concern is that only those who abide by the rules already 
will
 care to show up.  It could be very effective, but my gut just 
tells me
 that it would be like preaching to the choir.  Unfortunately, 
calling
 individuals out who have consistently demonstrated some of the
 negative or disrespectful behaviors we've mentioned on this 
thread is
 probably not the way to go either, unless done so by list 
moderators
 like Mary and Dave.

 I still think policing is the best way to go about this, but it 
would
 be up to the moderators, and could be a huge undertaking.  I 
like the
 idea of having the rules set up on a screen after subscribers 
complete
 the initial form, and am a huge fan of using I agree or I don't 
Agree
 buttons to finish the subscription process if it is feasible.  I 
think
 that would make it much harder for people to just say they were
 ignorant of the rules because they never cared to look for them.
 Sure, people will skim through it and not read, but at least we 
can
 say that they broke the rules at their own disgression and had 
an
 equal opportunity to read them.  Granted, I'm of the opinion 
that when
 you join a list it's your responsibility to use common etiquette
 and/or educate yourself on the rules and therefore we're already 
all
 equal here anyway, but obviously not everyone on the list 
operates
 that way and that's why we're having this problem to begin with.

 Arielle gave some great advice about when to just let a thread 
go and
 to not respond, and I echo some of Antonio's sentiments about 
deleting
 a lot of what doesn't interest you.  Some of the personal 
promotion
 stuff is annoying, but not harmful, and while I don't 
necessarily read
 what the promos say, I respect what the person making them is 
doing
 and their right to do it on a forum such as NABS.  After all, if
 you're doing something geared toward blind teens and young 
adults,
 it's logical to use NABS as a sounding board to gather 
interested
 parties.

 There's a great quote from Thumper, the bunny in Bambi, which I
 believe goes something like, "If you don't got nothing nice to 
say,
 don't say it."  I think most of the list members do well and 
abide by
 this, but the people who provide the put-downs, consistently 
respond
 negatively to other's comments, and who send inappropriate 
emails on
 list (and off by getting member emails and emailing to continue 
the
 inappropriate behaviors they start for all to see), are mostly 
repeat
 offenders who have left clear patterns of behavior behind in 
their
 emails.  I'm not saying we should jump the gun and kick those 
people
 off, but we definitely know where to start and who to keep an 
eye on
 for these problems based on the past, if only we had a method 
for
 doing so.

 On 8/15/14, Sami Osborne via nabs-l <nabs-l at nfbnet.org> wrote:
 Hi all,

 I agree with everything that's been said so far.

 I think that the guidelines should maybe be posted here more
 often, maybe not once every month but more than maybe once every
 6 months.  The reason I'm saying this is because since I've
 registered to this list, the guidelines have only been posted
 once.  I think this would be a great way for everybody to be
 aware of the rules and think about what they've done if they 
have
 caused trouble on here.
 Also, another suggestion is that when people register, after 
they
 submit their email address, name and password, why couldn't the
 guidelines be displayed, with buttons or links for the person
 would have to click on to agree or disagree? Note: if they
 accidentally click "disagree," then they could be given a second
 chance to click "agree," and if for the second time they click 
on
 "agree," then their subscription will not be taken.

 About discussing opinions: I think that these kinds of
 discussions are fine as long as people are not personally
 insulting or attacking each other.  In my opinion, if there is a
 discussion going on where two people have differing opinions and
 talk about their views, if it gets to the point where it starts
 to get bad, these people should stop discussing their opinions.

 These are just my thoughts.

 Thanks,

 Sami.

   ----- Original Message -----
 From: Arielle Silverman via nabs-l <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
 To: Antonio Guimaraes <freethaught at gmail.com>,National
 Association of Blind Students mailing list <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
 Date sent: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 15:32:02 -0700
 Subject: Re: [nabs-l] NABS List Manners

 I agree with greater enforcement.  I also think it would be nice
 if
 folks didn't respond to inappropriate messages on list.  A 
single
 off-topic or obnoxious message often goes unnoticed but a huge
 thread
 of replies clutters inboxes and annoys people, plus rewarding
 someone
 who might be making an obnoxious post to glean attention.  If a
 post
 bothers you, I suggest quietly emailing Mary and Dave Andrews so
 they
 can handle the offense and then quietly letting it go.  If you
 aren't
 sure whether a message you see is inappropriate, ask the
 moderators
 privately.  These are just my suggestions.
 Arielle

 On 8/14/14, Antonio Guimaraes via nabs-l <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
 wrote:
   Mary and all,

   This is not the first time list etiquette and civility has 
been
 brought up.

   People would think twice, or otherwise no longer have the
 opportunity to be
   inappropriate on list if there was enforcement of guidelines
 which suspended
   or banned people from list for violations.

   I have been threatened once for one spam sent to NFBNet lists,
 and I never
   did it again.  The specifics do not concern the NABS list and
 are not
   relevant to the discussion at this time, but you bet I could
 have been
   banned by moderators, and as stated above, would no longer 
have
 the chance
   to polite the list in whatever way deemed inappropriate by the
 moderators.

   Some off topic messages to NABS irk me, but are infrequent
 enough that they
   don't bother me.  I don't complain, hit delete ad move on.

   One much example are the periodic announcements from David 
about
 internet
   radio.  It takes me a few seconds to see the topic and decide
 the
   announcement does not interest me.  I delete, and move on with
 no stress.  I'm
   sure David's programs are interesting to some, and I accept a
 member's
   self-promotion as  a part of the supportive NABS community.

   I am not as tolerant of messages with personal information 
about
 others, or
   messages filled with self-disclosure on very personal and
 sensitive topics.

   We would be a better list if we were expected to act civilly,
 stay on topic,
   and so on, and be wormed, and disciplined when we do not.

   Antonio

   On Aug 10, 2014, at 8:55 PM, Mary Fernandez via nabs-l
 <nabs-l at nfbnet.org
   wrote:

   Good evening all,
   I hope everyone's weekend was very enjoyable.
   I am writing because I am deeply concerned about the manners, 
or
 lack
   thereof, which are more and more frequently being displayed on
 the
   list serv.  I'll quickly remind you that the list is supposed 
to
 be a
   resource for blind students, of all ages, young professionals,
 parents
   and teachers.  The list is "public" and "archivable", which
 means that
   anything we write on here is easily brought up when someone,
 anyone,
   conducts a Google search.
   When someone inquires about software, or help with anything,
 which
   relates to blindness, or has a question and asks that you
 contact them
   off line, it does not mean that you can be disrespectful to 
that
   person.  The list is NOT here for insults to be thrown back 
and
 forth,
   for inappropriate comments, or for general disrespect towards
 others.
   So, here is my question, how can we improve communication 
among
 list
   members? Does this list still have value, and if so what are 
the
   values and how to we maintain them? Let's have a discussion
 about
   issues and solutions.  I'm probably opening a can of worms, 
but
 I'm
   truly concerned about the tone of the messages on here, and 
the
   frequency with which they have been occurring.  Please, be
 polite and
   respectful when responding to this message, and if you have
 strong
   feelings you do not wish to make public, simply click on my
 email
   address: trillian551 at gmail.com and reply to me directly.

   Thank you,
   Sincerely,
   Your list moderator,

   --
   Mary Fernandez
   "I've learned that people will forget what you said, people 
will
   forget what you did, but people will never forget how you made
 them
   feel."
   --
   Maya Angelou

   _______________________________________________
   nabs-l mailing list
   nabs-l at nfbnet.org
   http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
   To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
 info for
   nabs-l:

 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/freethaught%4
 0gmail.com


   _______________________________________________
   nabs-l mailing list
   nabs-l at nfbnet.org
   http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
   To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
 info for
   nabs-l:

 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/arielle71%40g
 mail.com


 _______________________________________________
 nabs-l mailing list
 nabs-l at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info
 for nabs-l:
 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/ligne14%40ver
 izon.net

 _______________________________________________
 nabs-l mailing list
 nabs-l at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for
 nabs-l:
 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/crazy4clarine
t104%40gmail.com


 --
 Kaiti




--
Take care,
Ty
http://tds-solutions.net
He that will not reason is a bigot; he that cannot reason is a 
fool; he that dares not reason is a slave.


_______________________________________________
nabs-l mailing list
nabs-l at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
for nabs-l:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/kmaent1%40gma
il.com




More information about the NABS-L mailing list