[nagdu] Law on service dogs should be changed

National Association of Guide Dog Users blind411 at verizon.net
Tue Dec 31 20:44:48 UTC 2013


Dear All,
	Though this writer expresses his personal opinion on this issue, his
opinion does not take into account some of the complex issues we understand
and have discussed on this list. On the face, certification seems to be
reasonable; at deeper levels, though, the issue is frought with many
pitfalls. It is much more complex than the writer is aware!

Fraternally yours,

Marion Gwizdala, President
National Association of Guide Dog Users Inc.
National Federation of the Blind
(813) 626-2789 (Office)
888-NAGDU411 (Hotline
President at nagdu.org
www.nagdu.org



-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Ginger Kutsch
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2013 4:15 PM
To: NAGDU Mailing List, the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Subject: [nagdu] Law on service dogs should be changed

David Arrighi: Law on service dogs should be changed  

GazetteNet.com

Friday, December 27, 2013 

http://www.gazettenet.com/home/9956027-95/david-arrighi-law-on-service-dogs-
should-be-changed

 

 

To the editor: 

 

After reading many articles in local newspapers concerning the service dog
debate, I feel compelled to write about my feelings on this issue. First of
all, let me express my deepest heartfelt thanks to all veterans for making
my life safe and free. Being a retired veteran I know how much it means to
me to hear someone say, "Thank you for your service."

 

I also know that I would feel even more grateful to hear those words if I
came home with a war-related injury. I believe the federal law concerning
service dogs is too vague and needs to be changed. The law states that a
proprietor of a business can ask if the animal is a service dog but cannot
ask for certification. And the law also states that the owner of that dog
does not have to show proof of certification. My question is, why not?

 

What personal infringements would be violated? If the owner is asked then
the owner should be required to show proof. What reasoning is there for not
having to do so? What is wrong with having to show a certification for an
animal that you are so happy and proud to own? An animal that has been
through intensive and lengthy training to make its owner more comfortable
and safe. If I had a disability that required a service dog I would gladly
and proudly display any form, card or badge on my person at all times. The
owners/managers of businesses have their hands tied because they have to
abide by state and local health board rules and be concerned about
cleanliness and disease. They should have the right to ask and be assured
that the dog has been properly trained and is there for the right reason.

 

My wallet is full of licenses and forms that I have to show to go about my
daily life. It is not unreasonable to have to show documentation and have a
much better outcome for both parties.

 

David Arrighi

 

Southampton

 

The writer served in the U.S. Marine Corps from 1958 to 1962.

_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/blind411%40verizon.net





More information about the NAGDU mailing list