[nagdu] Trying to understand: denial of access bad allergies

[Dan Weiner]

Sorry I'm with Aleha on this one. If you are offering a service to the
general public then actualy I  really   couldn't care less about the
allergies or fear of dogs. Sure, I'm a human being and I'm sorry for people
who have problems but not when uit impinges on my legal access rights. It's
not a dog popularity contest guys.  If you are serving the public you must
be able to act in accordance with the laws that govern that service.

Dan W.


  

-----Original Message-----
From: nagdu [mailto:nagdu-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Daryl Marie via
nagdu
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2015 2:06 PM
To: NAGDU Mailing List,the National Association of Guide Dog Users
Cc: Daryl Marie
Subject: Re: [nagdu] Trying to understand: denial of access bad allergies

Aleeha,

As someone who has worked with, or received services from, people with
moderate to severe allergies and/or fear of dogs, my opinion is as follows:

1) If the allergy is completely legitimate, it is up to the Uber driver (in
this case) to wait with you until another ride arrives, IMHO.
2) Severe allergies like this are admittedly rare, but do happen.  A friend
of mine has kids, one of whom has moderate allergies to dogs, and they
aren't sure if it's the fur or the saliva that causes the allergic reaction.
3) Fear of dogs is a bit stickier, because there is something psychological
related to a fear.  I can't say I will ever understand it, but I have the
utmost respect for people who are afraid of dogs and choose to serve me
anyway.

JMT,

Daryl

----- Original Message -----
From: Aleeha Dudley via nagdu <nagdu at nfbnet.org>
To: nagdu at nfbnet.org
Cc: Aleeha Dudley <blindcowgirl1993 at gmail.com>
Sent: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 11:55:28 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: [nagdu] Trying to understand: denial of access bad allergies

Hello all,
Can you guys weigh in on this? I have been severely criticized and called
selfish for my opinion on this matter. This especially has to do with denial
of access to uber vehicles, but could also have implications elsewhere. 
Let's start with a hypothetical situation. I request a ride with the uber
app. As I do not think it is necessary, I do not inform the driver that I am
accompanied by my dog. The driver shows up and says that they cannot take my
dog because they or someone in their family has a severe allergy to dog
dander, to the point that their throat closes up. 
In my opinion, this person shouldn't be driving anyway because anyone could
be carrying pet dander on their clothing. My dog poses just as much a risk
as the next person if my dog is well groomed. I believe that everyone should
follow the law. Now, I'm told that this view makes me close minded and
selfish. I have a similar view on fear of dogs. I'm told that we are all
being close minded and spewing rhetoric when we talk about the uber lawsuit,
but that is a topic for another post. What do you all think? 
Aleeha 

Sent from my iPhone
_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/crazymusician%40shaw.ca
_______________________________________________
nagdu mailing list
nagdu at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nagdu_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nagdu:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nagdu_nfbnet.org/dcwein%40dcwein.cnc.net