[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking aboutblind justice

Ray Foret Jr rforetjr at comcast.net
Sat Aug 14 23:24:40 UTC 2010


Well, I reckon, Joseph, that between you, me and Dewey, we've about done this to death.

There are some who think that there should be no such thing as a blind conservative, but, we do exist.  There are conservatives who think that all blind people should just shut up and go away and sit in rocking chairs when we're not making brooms for $0.50 (fifty cents) an hour.

Well, neither is going to happen.  
Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!

A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!

E-Mail:
rforetjr at comcast dot net
Skype Name:
barefootedray

On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:35 PM, T. Joseph Carter wrote:

> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.)  He doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because those classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He assumes things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd think he'd have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's using it as an example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
> 
> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense.  Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots.  However, that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, since the law requires that the universities do what they were not doing.
> 
> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before, and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever admit to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and correct his reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the NFB and "our" being blind conservatives who think he was being an idiot here...)
> 
> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
> 
> Joseph
> 
> 
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what it would have anything to do with the NFB.
>> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, he still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even keep a marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list