[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking aboutblind justice

[Ray Foret Jr]

So much for trying to be reasonable huh?  I reckon that not only he, but too many others think that all blind people are liberal.  Well, I don't have anything against blind liberals myself; that's their right; but, hey, we have a right to be heard too.  I still say we should make some noise about this.  And, in fact, so we have.  But, you know as well as I do what the consequence would be if any of us tried to phone his show now don't we?  Why of course we do.  I think we might make a better case with O'Riley or someone.  But, that's all the thought I'll give that one.


Sincerely,
The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!

A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!

E-Mail:
rforetjr at comcast dot net
Skype Name:
barefootedray

On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:54 PM, Dewey Bradley wrote:

> I said it before and I'll say it again.
> look at the number of times he has been maried.
> He has no room to talk.
> I my self am a blind conservative republican.
> So I of course agree with allot of what he talks about with politicks, but he gives our party a bad name.
> Does he think that all blind people are libral or something.
> That means that he is a hypocrite
> Its called stereotyping.
> But that is not the issue here.
> I would try to call him, but he would just go on a tirade and just hang up on me.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
> To: "NFB Talk Mailing List" <nfb-talk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaughtalking aboutblind justice
> 
> 
>> Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.)  He doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because those classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He assumes things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd think he'd have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's using it as an example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
>> 
>> Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense. Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots.  However, that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, since the law requires that the universities do what they were not doing.
>> 
>> No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before, and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever admit to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and correct his reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the NFB and "our" being blind conservatives who think he was being an idiot here...)
>> 
>> I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
>> 
>> Joseph
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
>>> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what it would have anything to do with the NFB.
>>> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, he still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even keep a marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
>>> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
>>> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> nfb-talk mailing list
>> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org