[nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush Limbaugh talking about blind justice

David Andrews dandrews at visi.com
Sun Aug 15 12:25:15 UTC 2010


I agree and I am the Moderator.  However, it is usually best to 
Moderate with as light a hand as possible.

So, let's try this -- Saturday the 14th was my Birthday, so as my 
Birthday present, everybody move on.

Thanks!

Dave

At 10:13 PM 8/14/2010, you wrote:
>I heartily agree with that.  I think this thread has about run its course,
>but I'm not the moderator.   (smile)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
>Behalf Of Ray Foret Jr
>Sent: Saturday, August 14, 2010 6:25 PM
>To: NFB Talk Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Check Out This Link On Rush
>Limbaughtalkingaboutblind justice
>
>Well, I reckon, Joseph, that between you, me and Dewey, we've about done
>this to death.
>
>There are some who think that there should be no such thing as a blind
>conservative, but, we do exist.  There are conservatives who think that all
>blind people should just shut up and go away and sit in rocking chairs when
>we're not making brooms for $0.50 (fifty cents) an hour.
>
>Well, neither is going to happen.
>Sincerely,
>The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>
>A Very Proud and Happy Mac User!!!
>
>E-Mail:
>rforetjr at comcast dot net
>Skype Name:
>barefootedray
>
>On Aug 14, 2010, at 4:35 PM, T. Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> > Put simply, Mr. Limbaugh assumed that we have access to print books and
>that the Kindle was an optional thing.  (He said the latter outright.)  He
>doesn't know that we have had problems with required classes because those
>classes use electronic components that are not accessible.  He assumes
>things are hunky-dory and that we're rocking the boat.  You'd think he'd
>have taken the time to know that wasn't true, since he's using it as an
>example of the DOJ wasting its time.  Bad on him, I say.
> >
> > Then we have the question of it as an example.  I say it's an example of
>the DOJ wasting its time because that's the only thing that makes sense.
>Yes, Mr. Limbaugh, the DOJ has made it quite clear that they are not
>concerned about racially-motivated voter intimidation, as long as the
>intimidator is not white.  Yes, that makes them (not us) bigots.  However,
>that does not make the DOJ's action wrong in this instance, since the law
>requires that the universities do what they were not doing.
> >
> > No, I believe the man is wrong in this instance.  He has been before,
> > and will be again.  Because I doubt he has enough humility to ever
> > admit to being so, I do not see it as worth our while to try and
> > correct his reasoning.  (I define "our" here in both th sense of the
> > NFB and "our" being blind conservatives who think he was being an
> > idiot here...)
> >
> > I don't think I've got much more to say on the subject.
> >
> > Joseph
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 07:21:02PM -0500, Dewey Bradley wrote:
> >> Even though he has a point about the Black panthers, I don't see what it
>would have anything to do with the NFB.
> >> He is so full of him self that all that money he makes from his show, he
>still will charge you to listen to it on line, The guy can't even keep a
>marriage, how many times has he been married, 7 times I think.
> >> So he has no room to go on a tirade on anyone.
> >> besides the fact that he doesn't even have his facts correct on this.
> >

                         David Andrews:  dandrews at visi.com
Follow me on Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/dandrews920





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list