[nfb-talk] Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act

Judy Jones jtj1 at cableone.net
Tue Mar 31 23:42:39 UTC 2015


Not necessarily true,  the police do NOT always side with a restaurant 
owner, and I know of such cases.

Judy


-----Original Message----- 
From: John Heim via nfb-talk
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:25 PM
To: Mike Freeman ; NFB Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act

I don't know... When a blind person is refused service, the police
already routinely side with the restaurant owner. Can you imagine what
they'll say when the owner claims his religion prohibits serving someone
with a dog?  I can envision some cabbie deciding to take it upon himself
to stand up for his rights to refuse service to people with guide dogs
not knowing and not caring what a federal court would say.

Governor Pence of Indiana only  recently admitted the law would allow
businesses to discriminate against gays.  At first he was denying
everything. It has been nearly impossible to get answers from these
people and the confusion around what the bill allows and does not allow
is deliberately enormous. You'll never get them to clear up what you can
do and what you can't under this law.



On 03/31/2015 03:44 PM, Mike Freeman via nfb-talk wrote:
> Federal law trumps state law and the ADA still applies in the situation of
> people using guide dogs being refused cab rides.
>
> In other words, I think Chris is correct.
>
> Mike Freeman
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfb-talk [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Michael
> Hingson via nfb-talk
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 1:24 PM
> To: 'Chris Nusbaum'; 'NFB Talk Mailing List'; 'John Heim'
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act
>
> Chris,
>
> I respectively disagree. What about the many Islamic oriented taxi drivers
> who deny the rights of blind persons with guide dogs to ride in their 
> cabs?
> I believe that under this law blind guide dog users can be prevented from
> equal and total access.
>
> The "Religious Freedom Restoration Act" does effect blind people directly.
> The law isn't just about gays and lesbians.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfb-talk [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris
> Nusbaum via nfb-talk
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 12:35 PM
> To: 'John Heim'; 'NFB Talk Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [nfb-talk] Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act
>
> John,
>
> Regardless of our individual feelings on this legislation, I don't think 
> it
> would be appropriate for the NFB to add our collective voice to the 
> already
> strong chorus of opposition to this bill.  Throughout our history we have
> had a policy which states that we do not officially get involved in
> political controversies which do not directly effect the blind. If we were
> to justify our opposition to this legislation by asserting that blind 
> people
> could be effected because there are blind people who are also gay, we 
> could
> use the same logic to justify our collective support of or opposition to
> virtually every issue with which a federal or state legislature concerns
> itself. In adopting this line of reasoning, we would begin to lose our 
> focus
> and eventually the very purpose for which our organization is founded. We
> are an organization which deals specifically with issues which directly
> effect the blind on account of our blindness. Other matters, however
> important they might be to an individual blind person, would not fall 
> under
> our jurisdiction and would be contrary to the organizational purposes
> established in our Constitution.
>
> Chris
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfb-talk [mailto:nfb-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of John Heim
> via nfb-talk
> Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 3:12 PM
> To: NFB Talk Mailing List
> Subject: [nfb-talk] Indiana Religious Freedom Restoration Act
>
>
> The NFB should issue a statement condemning Indiana's religious freedom 
> act.
>
> I've been discriminated against in my life. I once was  turned down for a
> job because the person who did the interview literally would not believe
> that a blind person could use a computer. I'd been working as a programmer
> and systems administrator for 15 years at that point. Another time, I
> actually diagnosed a network problem during the job interview. I plugged 
> my
> laptop into the network, ran some diagnostics, and explained what the
> problem was right there during the interview. But I didn't get that job
> either because they said part of the job was drawing images for their web
> site. Admittedly, It's debatable whether that second example is
> discrimination. In fact, I personally would not call it discrimination but
> people I've mentioned it to have felt otherwise. The point is that I know
> what it's like being turned down for a job because of something you can't
> control.  I know what it's like when that happens to you when you're 
> worried
> about having health insurance for your family and making the house 
> payment.
>
> I remember coming home from the job interview where I diagnosed the 
> network
> problem, dancing around and telling my wife I'd nailed it. I remember the
> feeling I got a few days later when she read me the rejection letter that
> said they really needed someone who could see. I said it was their loss 
> and
> tried to believe it. But we really needed our health insurance.
>
> Now you have a bunch of lawmakers in Indiana telling us it's okay for
> someone to turn a person down for a job because they're in a gay marriage.
> Most of those lawmakers in Indiana have probably never been discriminated
> against in their lives. They don't know what it's like.
>
> What they are doing is just wrong. And even if you don't agree, we in the
> NFB need to stand  up against discrimination in all of it's forms.
> This law is intended for use against gays but there's no reason it can't 
> be
> used against racial minorities or even disabled people.
>
> We have to add our voices to those who have come out against this law.
> It's the right thing to do.
>
>
> --
> John Heim
> john at johnheim.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nfb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/cnusbaumnfb%40gmail.co
> m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nfb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/info%40michaelhingson.
> com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nfb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfb-talk mailing list
> nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfb-talk:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/john%40johnheim.net

-- 
John Heim
john at johnheim.com


_______________________________________________
nfb-talk mailing list
nfb-talk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
nfb-talk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfb-talk_nfbnet.org/jtj1%40cableone.net 





More information about the nFB-Talk mailing list