[nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
Mike Freeman
k7uij at panix.com
Fri Feb 15 03:19:19 UTC 2013
My difficulty is that I am rather skeptical that a truly effective access
technology bill can be written given the pace at which innovation occurs and
new technologies are brought on-line. Accessibility (or rather, the lack
thereof) is one of those concepts that's kind of like that which the late
Supreme Court Justice Potter Stuart said about pornography: "I can't define
it but I know it when I see it!".
Mike Freeman
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Larry Wayland
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 6:57 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
Gary, Yes I can. Let me find out the latest act number and I will send you a
copy. At one time it was Arkansas act 1227, but last year there was some
minor changes made to improve it and the act number changed.
What I have been watching this year are bill numbers so we will be able to
attend the committee meeting to fight the changes these three senators are
planning to make. So far a bill has not been submitted, as far as we can
tell.
By the way, I down loaded the sample bill in 1999 from the NFB web site. My
rep followed that outline and wrote the bill that became act 1227 to fit
Arkansas. I don't know if that sample is still there are not.
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wunder
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 9:56 AM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
Larry, can you send us Arkansas's law? In Missouri we joint Massachusetts in
a short-lived boycott of Microsoft products. Our Dir. of information
technology in Missouri was incensed by Microsoft's indifference, but he said
it was impractical for Missouri to do such a boycott if the federal
government and other states were not willing to be a part of it.
Warmly,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Larry Wayland
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 6:52 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
Arkansas, I have been told by people who should know has the strongest law
in the nation for technology for blind and visually impaired people. This
year Three Arkansas Senators have gotten together to try to change that. We
are planning a big fight.
If blind and visually impaired people in other states could meet with their
Representatives and pass state laws that are stronger than the federal laws
these development companies would have to make their software and hardware
accessible or not be able to sell it. It was hoped when the law was passed
in Arkansas in 1999 other states would be able to follow suit but for
whatever reason that has not happened. We are really hoping we are going to
be able to head off this attempt to weaken the Law.
Making a software package accessible for blind people is not only good for
us, its good for everyone. A package that is accessible is also much cleaner
and better planned.
Larry
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wunder
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 2:39 PM
To: 'NFB in Computer Science Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
I encourage you to do that. As a part of the ADA Accessibility Team, perhaps
you have an affirmative obligation to do it. If we can't secure accessible
software from the Federal Government, then Section 508 is a lie and we might
as well figure that out sooner than later. What do you have to lose: you
have a stellar work record, plenty of seniority, and if they decide to make
it tough on you, you can retire. How much better for you to do the heavy
lifting than the fellow trying to break into government service.
Warmly,
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Stanzel, Susan -
FSA, Kansas City, MO
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 1:05 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
I sure wish I had some hints. It seems like Adobe should do more to make
flash accessible. On some of my courses they don't even use customary
keystrokes we all know. You can't do a list of links because nothing looks
like a link. I'm not sure what I will do in my retirement, but I will not
mind leaving the daily struggle. As part of the section 508 team here I am
really thinking of filing. At the moment I am just dreading my struggle with
Pearson Vue to make the accommodations for a Java certification test. Steve,
Curtis said you have had some dealings with them. Is that true?
Susie
-----Original Message-----
From: nfbcs [mailto:nfbcs-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Tracy Carcione
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:28 PM
To: NFB in Computer Science Mailing List
Subject: Re: [nfbcs] Inaccessible training, again
I was thinking about something Steve said. When there were actual human
instructors, I could get them to make things accessible, or at least to try.
I think it's hard for one person to stand next to another and say, "No, I
don't care about your problems at all." And, if the trainer was writing on
the board, I could ask him or a classmate what was written, usually. What's
so frustrating about these online courses is that, not only are they
inaccessible, but I can't find anyone to talk to about it who has the power
to do something about it. There's no accountability.
There doesn't even seem to be anyone who's remotely interested.
Tracy
> Tracy,
>
> Do you know what the software that is being used is called? I am
> dealing with a similar problem here and getting nowhere. I have had a
> couple of cases where the reason for the course was for me to just
> press a button to acknowledge I had read some documents that I had
> read, and the button was not at all accessible. When I complained,
> reasonable accommodation was seen to be having a co-worker press the
> button for me. That worked in the short run, but what about the long
> run? I have had no luck getting the name of a contact outside of my
> employer which is what I really need to see what can be done.
> However, in my case, a good deal of the problem is with FLASH. In one
> course, the problem was that all buttons that were used in the entire
> course remained visible to Window-Eyes, JFW and NVDA. The TAB key
> even jumped to them. However most would do nothing when pressed
> because they were not part of the current window. There could easily
> have been 100 unlabeled buttons of which maybe five were active, and
> the others did not show visually. I have another set of courses where
> I figured out that the button that goes to the next frame which has a
> label of "next" is identified as "Close" by screen readers. This
> isn't a problem once I figured it out. Some of my courses display PDF
> documents within the course but apparently provide their own
> inaccessible PDF viewer. Sometimes I can get these documents
> separately once I find the person who wrote the course, but it all
> takes time away from my job. In short, I'm with you completely but
> don't really know where to turn. Adobe will tell us that FLASH can be
> made accessible and they have all kinds of information as to how to do
> it. Developers will tell you that Adobe puts all of the burden on
> them. Okay, so I'm venting, too.
> <smile> In my case, most courses have been accessible for me where I
> work until the past couple of years, so I'm seeing the accessibility
> slipping away. The problem is that nobody realized that what they had
> done was accessible because one doesn't complain about something when
> it works. In the old days, when there were instructors for classes, I
> could often get by with taking careful notes and perhaps reading just
> a little from the material.
> I might just study a couple of diagrams with the Optacon. However, we
> not only don't have instructors any longer, we are required to take
> many more courses, some for legal documentation purposes. Some
> courses are such that I would have to get security clearance for a
> reader, and the workload is so unpredictable, it isn't a great
> solution, especially when this wouldn't have to be a problem. Running
> into this kind of thing as well as the problems you and I have
> mentioned with respect to computer update screens, and even what I see
> as flakiness with screen readers in certain applications just gives
> one an uneasy feeling about our progress. There has to be a way to
> put some pressure on some of these developers, and if we can get our
> TEACH act passed, it might help in that some of these developers
> probably develop some on-line courses for higher education. However,
> in a large company, this kind of thing is very frustrating.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Steve Jacobson
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Steve Jacobson
>
> On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:36:54 -0500, Tracy Carcione wrote:
>
>>I was recently assigned some online training at work. It's always
>>been inaccessible, but I thought I should give it a try and see if
>>somehow they had changed things. Nope, still inaccessible.
>>It's so frustrating, because it's almost accessible, except that there
>>are lots of unlabeled buttons, and, when they ask a question designed
>>to test my knowledge before moving on, it's displayed as a picture,
>>with no text.
>>At which point I'm stuck, and have to stop.
>>I've complained to Human Resources, to Training, and to some VP in
>>charge of web-based training. I just left feedback on the site,
>>trying to explain the problem. I really don't know what else to do.
>>If they really want me to take this course, they'll have to assign
>>someone to sit with me and do it, and the boss doesn't want to do
>>that. So I get no training.
>>I'm not sure what I'd actually learn from the training, but I guess
>>I'll never know.
>>And to add insult to injury, right on top of the training website it
>>says "empowering people". Well, not blind people.
>>I'm just venting my frustration, though if anyone has some idea, I'm
>>open to suggestions.
>>Tracy
>
>
>
>>_______________________________________________
>>nfbcs mailing list
>>nfbcs at nfbnet.org
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
>>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> nfbcs:
>>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/steve.jacobson%40vi
>>si.com
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbcs mailing list
> nfbcs at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nfbcs:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/carcione%40access.n
> et
>
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/susan.stanzel%40kcc.usda.
gov
This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely
for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message
or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law
and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you
have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the
email immediately.
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/gwunder%40earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/lhwayland%40sbcglobal.net
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/gwunder%40earthlink.net
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/lhwayland%40sbcglobal.net
_______________________________________________
nfbcs mailing list
nfbcs at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbcs_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbcs:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbcs_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com
More information about the NFBCS
mailing list