[Nfbf-l] Seeing with Sound - The vOICe an Appended recent article in the Huffington Post
Alan Dicey
adicey at bellsouth.net
Thu Feb 28 03:29:24 UTC 2013
Dear Friends,
For your information. Appended is a recent article in the Huffington Post.
With Best Regards,
God Bless
Alan
Miami, Florida
Seeing with Sound - The vOICe
http://www.seeingwithsound.com/winvoice.htm
Seeing sound and touching data: how new senses will expand your world.
By Ben Thomas.
When Erik Weihenmayer conquered the Seven Summits - the tallest peak on each
of the seven continents - his friends were impressed, but not exactly
surprised. After all, Erik had scaled Mt. Everest a few years earlier, and
he liked to spend his vacations skydiving, skiing and whitewater rafting.
Those who didn't know much about him, though, were shocked to learn that
Erik has been blind since age 13.
Though not everyone with damaged eyesight aims to become a world-class
adventurer, new technologies are transforming the ways that people with
visual impairment - or even total blindness - are interacting with the
world. Sonic glasses use echolocation to translate sound waves into
electrical signals; and vibrotactile displays can map those signals onto a
grid of stimulation points across the touch-sensitive surface of the tongue.
The newly approved Argus II device, meanwhile, stimulates simple patterns
directly onto the optic nerve.
A grid of electrical signals might seem like a poor substitute for the
richness of sight - systems like these lack the resolution to render
subtleties of color and shading. But as it turns out, advanced technology
may not even be necessary for a brain to reconstruct visual imagery from
other sensory cues; some blind patients report that, after practice, they're
able to literally see the scenes they're "feeling." This isn't
pseudoscience - fMRI scans have confirmed that when some blind people touch
Braille or use echolocation, visual areas of their brain behave as if they
were actually seeing an image.
Some scientists and hackers are working to blur sensory boundaries even
further. Since the early 2000s, body-modification artists have been
implanting electromagnets under their skin - a sense that offers a sort of
"buzzing sensation" in the presence of electrically charged objects. And
this February, a team of Duke University researchers announced the creation
of a brain implant that enables rats to "feel" infrared light through
touch-sensitive neural pathways.
Like these scientists, I have a strong suspicion that new technological
senses await us in the near future. To explain why, let me try an analogy
from a form of technology that's already familiar to us: Phones.
Telephones began as a simple idea: What if we could transmit human voices
over wires, just as telegraph lines carried simple electrical pulses? And
for the first century or so of the telephone's existence, that sole function
was largely its reason for existing - people kept telephones wired up in
their homes and offices so they could have real-time audio conversations
without the inconvenience of physical travel.
By the early 1990s, though, expectations had shifted. Mobile phones were
getting cheaper every year, untethering phone connections from physical
wires. Thanks to aggressive marketing by Xerox, fax machines had
proliferated throughout the '70s and '80s, cementing the idea that phone
lines could send and receive visual images. Although the concepts of fax
machines and mobile phones had existed since the turn of the twentieth
century, we came to rely on them more and more in our daily lives as they
became easier and more reliable to use. Over time, we've begun to regard
these tools as extensions of our own senses.
It's not hard to see how this trend has accelerated as phones continue to
get lighter and more powerful, scanning and emailing take the place of
sending faxes, and audio conversations are ousted by video chats. Touch
screens, which seemed thrillingly futuristic just five years ago, now come
standard on most smartphones and tablets - a success story that's grown
touch screen development into a multi-billion-dollar industry.
Take, for instance, a high-end touch screen manufacturer like Sollensys.
Over the past several years, they've helped develop flexible touch-sensitive
screens, as well as multi-layer screens that respond to multiple
simultaneous tactile inputs. If these developments continue, touch screen
companies like Sollensys may soon be printing touch-sensitive menus onto LCD
projection screens and walls - and providing flexible electronic "paper"
with instant wireless access to the latest news reports.
The next logical step is to mount hands-free wireless devices onto our
bodies - which is exactly what Google Glass aims to do in the very near
future. And so the phone - which began as a system for hardwired audio
communication - has evolved into almost-unrecognizable forms: Wearable,
wafer-thin, touch-sensitive pads that link us with a worldwide network of
sights and sounds. Useful technology has a way of merging with its users.
Unlikely as it is that most of us will go under the knife for the sake of
feeling magnetism or infrared light - or, more to the point, hand over some
of our perfectly healthy neurons to questionable new senses - techniques
like echolocation, and technologies like vibrotactile tongue maps, seem to
hint that such an all-or-nothing approach might not be necessary. If a blind
person's brain can be trained to see Braille letters - or to create vivid
mental pictures from a grid of electrical stimulation - could tomorrow's
non-invasive implants help us physically feel the movements of financial
markets; of weather systems; of traffic patterns? What new insights might we
gain from such intuitive perceptions? What would such expanded senses feel
like?
As our relationships with our phones demonstrate, technology tends to expand
the range of data we consider integral to our daily lives - and that trend
holds hint about our near future. Though I'm not blind or deaf, I'm still
physically unable to perceive most of what's happening around me. I can't
see protein molecules or ultraviolet radiation; I can't count a nanosecond
or hear a 50,000-Hz sound. Like all human brains, mine evolved, as Richard
Dawkins said, "to cope with medium-sized objects moving at medium speeds
through medium distances in Africa."
But it also evolved to invent - to build tools that expand its reach
light-years beyond that African savannah. Though we might not all want to
scale Mount Everest, we share Erik Weihenmayer's unwillingness to let our
limited senses limit our adventures. When I think back to the landlines and
card catalogues of the 1950s, I'm amazed that people managed to work and
think so efficiently under those constraints. What, then, will our
grandchildren think of our touch screens and wireless networks - and with
what senses will they look back?
Source URL:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ben-thomas/seeing-sound-and-touching_b_2742970.html
_______________________________________________
More information about the NFBF-L
mailing list