[nfbmi-talk] The word is Accessible

[joe harcz Comcast]

Now, here I not only agree in part Fred, but one hundred percent. I think 
that we should intervene the next time the CAP contract comes up to request 
an alternative entity take over that job.

I found CAP's lack of responsiveness to your, John's, and Advocates for the 
Blind in the summer 2008 meeting (that was the famous bullet proof drape 
meeting) appalling.

Fact was MCB was non-responsive to consumers and so was CAP.

Fact is that Advocates for the Blind had to take it to the picket line to 
get MCB's and CAP's attention to systemic service delivery issues.

And how did they get responded too? Well as you and all know with paranoia, 
and with intimidation.

So much for Cannon's boastful open and responsive MCB eh?

CAP should have figured out there were systemic issues right then and there. 
After all they were well represented at that meeting of which I have the 
minutes and the complete audio. Weren't they listening?

That question is definitely answered by their lack of responsiveness and 
system relief to this very day.

Keep at 'em Fred!

Peace,

Joe
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Fred Wurtzel" <f.wurtzel at comcast.net>
To: "'NFB of Michigan Internet Mailing List'" <nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org>
Cc: "'Jeanette Brown'" <jbrown at mpas.org>
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 10:00 PM
Subject: Re: [nfbmi-talk] The word is Accessible


> Hello,
>
> These people can barely read, otherwise they would be giving good advice 
> to
> the MCB and blind people who are getting sub standard services.  This is a
> bankrupt organization that is taking money under false pretenses.  If we
> don't take these frauds on, shame on us.
>  I say it is at a minimum a breech of contract since MPAS has a "contract"
> to provide protection and advocacy and have not performed under that
> contract.  Shame, shame, I say.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Fred
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nfbmi-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:nfbmi-talk-bounces at nfbnet.org]
> On Behalf Of laschuck at juno.com
> Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 9:18 PM
> To: nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> Subject: [nfbmi-talk] The word is Accessible
>
> Hello everybody, especially Joe,
> I found it interesting that the reply you got from MPAS did not use the 
> word
> "accessible".  She used the word "assessable," which would mean something
> that can be assessed, or measured, rather than "accessed", or made 
> available
> in a usable format.  Is it possible that the person who wrote you doesn't
> even know the correct word?  Wow.  Lydia
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> nfbmi-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/f.wurtzel%40comc
> ast.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nfbmi-talk mailing list
> nfbmi-talk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> nfbmi-talk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbmi-talk_nfbnet.org/joeharcz%40comcast.net