[nfbwatlk] Report on Yesterday's Meeting with Staff of Governor Gregoire

Jedi loneblindjedi at samobile.net
Wed Jan 6 04:28:08 UTC 2010

Mike and List:

Bob Sellers forwarded a web site created by Joanne Laurent 
This web site is one useful way to contact your local legislators and 
advise them that combining the agencies is a bad idea. I have already 
sent messages to my local legislators and to my national 
representatives. In the case of state legislators, I explained the 
importance of dSB services in my life and also explained how serious 
the situation is for blind people in our state and nation and what DSB 
can and has been doing about it. In the case of national 
representatives, I have asked them to please advise the Governor that 
combination of agencies is bad for the blind. Joanne's web site is easy 
to use, and she has placed all the necessary tools you'll need to 
contact your legislators in one convenient spot. I highly suggest her 
web site as a portal for making the appropriate contacts.

Mike, thanks for letting us know what's happening and please do 
continue to keep us informed as to what we can do next.


Original message:
> Fellow Federationists:

> Yesterday, Cindy van Winkle, President of the State Rehabilitation 
> Council (SRC) for the Department of Services for the Blind (DSB), 
> Denise Colley, President of the Washington Council of the Blind (WCB) 
> and I met with three members of Governor Gregoire's staff involved in 
> efforts to streamline state government and more efficiently spend the 
> state's money. The staff present were: Kathleen Drew, Executive Policy 
> Advisor, Sustainability, State Government, Reform, Kelly Wicker, Policy 
> Analyst, Government Reform & Kari Burrell, Executive Policy Advisor, 
> Human Services. The meeting lasted about an hour.

> It was obvious throughout the meeting that the "bean-counter" mentality 
> holds sway in the Governor's office. The staff apparently views all 
> human services as interchangeable widgets that can be mixed and matched 
> with no diminution of the level or quality of services to those being 
> served by agency reorganization. Put another way, it was clear that the 
> Governor's staff had virtually no concept that rehabilitating the blind 
> is a specialized endeavor involving a unique mix of instruction in the 
> skills of blindness both to clients and their famlies and teaching the 
> clients to cope with the attitudes, erroneous stereotypes and 
> misconceptions about blindness held by society. In the view of the 
> staff, since the umbrella agency of the Department of Social and Health 
> Services (DSHS) provides human services to many Washingtonians 
> (including those provided by the general rehabilitation agency, the 
> Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, DVR), it would be a good fit 
> for DSB. It had not
>  occurred to the staff that DSB might have special accounting expertise 
> in making best use of vocational rehabilitation funds from the Federal 
> Government (Section 110 moneys) and Social Security reimbursements. In 
> fact, the staff maintained that even were the blindness groups 
> successful in protecting the separate agency status of DSB, accounting 
> functions would undoubtedly be ordered to be done by the general 
> accounting agency for the state.

> In investigating what organizational structure might be contemplated 
> for DSB, the staff looked at states similar in size/population to 
> Washington but admitted that it had not considered how well services 
> for the blind were rendered by these other states with combined 
> services nor were the consumer groups of the blind in those states 
> consulted to ascertain what the blind themselves thought of their 
> vocational rehabilitation services.

> Staff would be interested in statistics re level of services ans 
> satisfaction of clients with such services. I told them that we (both 
> consumer organizations) had a wealth of anecdotal evidence that 
> conglomerate agencies did not serve the blind adequately but that 
> meaningful statistics might be hard to come by because (1) we, the 
> blind, are a small minority and coming up with statistically valid 
> conclusions is thus problematic and (2) how could one easily quantify 
> "good services". (Yes, one can use closures as a measure but this does 
> not always accurately reflect good service.) I did not mention this 
> but, to some degree, efining "good services" is sort of like the late 
> Justice Potter Stuart's definition of pornography: "I can't define it 
> but I know it when I see it!"

> Staff asked the three of us if we would meet with the head of DSHS to 
> strategize how to meet our objections while going ahead with the 
> reorganization. I said that we would always talk but that we would be 
> extraordinarily difficult to convince and that we would see everyone in 
> the legislative arena.

> It boggles my mind that it never occured to staff to actually ask the 
> blind themselves whether a reorganization was or could be made to work. 
> It is obvious to me that appearances (that is, the structure of 
> government on an agency organization chart) matters to staff almost 
> more than functionality of said agencies. Although I did not state it 
> this baldly, it would appear that in approaching the state legislature, 
> the form of government matters almost more than the substance. I hate 
> to make such a harsh judgment but it is hard not to come to such a conclusion.

> So where to we go from here? WE can try to come up with anecdotal 
> information regarding poor VR services under conglomerate agencies. 
> Barring a miracle, however, I believe that we must now mobilize 
> ourselves for the legislative session. I suspect that any 
> reorganization will go through the "Government Operations" committees 
> in the Senate and House. I will ascertain who chairs these committees 
> in the next day or two and we should start making contacts. WE should 
> also begin to contact our local legislators, making it clear that while 
> DSB is not perfect, its current structure and placement within state 
> government should not be altered and that the blind of Washington are 
> united in this view.

> Stay tuned.

> Michael Freeman, President
> National Federation of the Blind of Washington
> _______________________________________________
> nfbwatlk mailing list
> nfbwatlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for nfbwatlk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nfbwatlk_nfbnet.org/loneblindjedi%40samobile.net

Email services provided by the System Access Mobile Network.  Visit 
www.serotek.com to learn more about accessibility anywhere.

More information about the NFBWATlk mailing list