[Blind-Gov] Section 508 Complaint Processing

latonya phipps phippslatonya at gmail.com
Fri Oct 27 16:05:45 UTC 2023


My focus is on administering compliance.

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 27, 2023, at 10:56 AM, Timothy Elder <telder at trelegal.com> wrote:
> 
> About filing a complaint or administering compliance?  
> 
> 
> Timothy Elder 
> Attorney 
> TRE Legal Practice 
> 1155 Market Street, Tenth Floor 
> San Francisco, CA 94103 
> Phone: (415) 873-9199
> Fax: (415) 952-9898
>  
> E-mail: telder at trelegal.com 
> www.trelegal.com 
> Twitter: @trelegal
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
> Confidentiality Notice
> This e-mail may contain confidential information that may also be legally privileged and that is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized agent of the recipient, please be advised that any dissemination or copying of this e-mail, or taking of any action in reliance on the information contained herein, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify me immediately by use of the Reply button, and then delete the e-mail from your system. Thank you!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Blind-Gov <blind-gov-bounces at nfbnet.org> On Behalf Of latonya phipps via Blind-Gov
> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2023 7:13 AM
> To: Ronza Othman <rothmanjd at gmail.com>
> Cc: latonya phipps <phippslatonya at gmail.com>; List for blind government employees <blind-gov at nfbnet.org>; Eve Hill <ehill at browngold.com>
> Subject: Re: [Blind-Gov] Section 508 Complaint Processing
> 
> Thank you. Those were not my questions though. I had more internal process questions.
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2023, at 9:42 AM, Ronza Othman <rothmanjd at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> The way the law is written, essentially federal agencies are supposed to follow procedures similar to the ones they apply for section 504. There needs to be intake, investigation, and adjudication which means a decision on whether or not section 508 was violated And what the agency is going to do about it if it was. If there was an exception or waiver, there needs to be an explanation of what that exception or waiver was, why it was granted, when it was granted, and when it will end . There also need to be rights given to explain that if the filer does not agree with the decision that they can now go to federal court because they have exhausted their administrative complaint requirements. It’s not super complicated if you take a look at the 504 regulations  or the requirements for investigation and adjudication that exists in section 504.
>> 
>> Ronza Othman, President
>> National Federation of the Blind of Maryland
>> 443-426-4110
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>>> On Oct 27, 2023, at 5:18 AM, latonya phipps via Blind-Gov <blind-gov at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello Fellow Federationists,
>>> I hope all is well. If anyone is knowledgeable about the section 508 complaint process outside of the chief information officer roll, could you please get in touch with me off list? I would like to ask some questions. My email address is phippslatonya at gmail.com. Thank you.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blind-Gov mailing list
>>> Blind-Gov at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-gov_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Blind-Gov:
>>> %(user_optionsurl)s
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Blind-Gov mailing list
> Blind-Gov at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blind-gov_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for Blind-Gov:
> %(user_optionsurl)s



More information about the Blind-Gov mailing list