[Blind-rollers] [Alerts] Court denies Abercrombie & Fitch request to delay making Hollister Co. stores wheelchair accessible

Sun Nov 17 00:31:34 UTC 2013

hI, all,
Sorry for all the links in the middle of the article, but guess that's how it all goes.
Bibi and son Odie
----- Original Message ----- 
From: CCDC Member Alerts List 
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 11:24 AM
Subject: [Alerts] Court denies Abercrombie & Fitch request to delay making Hollister Co. stores wheelchair accessible
*FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE*
*November 16, 2013*
*CONTACT:    *
 Kevin W. Williams
                        720.336.3584
                       kwilliams at ccdconline.org
                       Amy F. Robertson
                        303.917.1870
                       arobertson at creeclaw.org
 HOLLISTER CO. STORES MUST MOVE FORWARD WITH WHEELCHAIR ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS
Federal Court Refuses to Stay Injunction Pending Appeal
On August 20, 2013, US District Court Judge Wiley Y. Daniel ordered Abercrombie & Fitch, the owners and operators of Hollister Co. Stores
<http://ccdconline.org/sites/default/files/2013.08.20_211_permanent_inj
unction_and_admin_close_of_case.pdf>to
make 231 stores nationwide accessible to customers who use wheelchairs.
Abercrombie & Fitch filed an appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 9, 2013, and in a separate Motion
<http://ccdconline.org/sites/default/files/2013.09.09_217_def_motion_to
_stay_perm_injunction.pdf>, asked the District Court to stay or suspend the injunction until after the appeal is decided.  Yesterday, November 15, 2013 the Court issued an Order
<http://ccdconline.org/sites/default/files/2013.11.15_233_order_denying_
defendant_motion_to_stay_injunction.pdf>and found no good reason for Abercrombie & Fitch to delay making its
stores accessible.
            Hollister Co. Stores were all designed and constructed after the passage of the ADA.  They built porches with steps at many of their
stores that Abercrombie & Fitch claims makes their customers feel like they are entering a surf shack.
            Abercrombie & Fitch argued the Court should wait to see how the appeals court rules before making it spend any money remodeling stores, which they claimed would require entrances to be "torn out and reconstructed, resulting in lost sales and customer goodwill."  Judge
Daniel rejected the argument and said that the Defendants have discretion as to how to remodel 77 entrances per year four three years.  Recent Abercrombie & Fitch reports show it intends to remodel its Hollister Co. stores soon anyway.  During a webcast with analysts on November 6, 2013
<http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?p=irol-eventDetails&c=61701&ev
entID=5040771>,
Senior Vice President of Marketing Craig Brommers introduced a new storefront concept, which would make the entrances accessible to
everyone.   Abercrombie & Fitch failed to tell the Court.  The Court ruled,
While the harm to Defendants is primarily economic should I deny the motion to stay, Plaintiffs will continue suffering the indignity of being unable to use the raised porch entrances of 231 Hollister clothing stores located
throughout the United States should I grant the motion.
            It is unknown how long the appeal will take, but now Abercrombie & Fitch must make 77 stores accessible each year and must complete all by 2017.
Kevin Williams, Legal Program Director for the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition Legal Program <http://ccdconline.org/>, said, "We have been in litigation for four years now.  There was and is no reason for Abercrombie & Fitch to build new stores in malls with inaccessible sections.  It is time for them to make all of their stores -- and all parts of their stores
--  accessible to all customers.  We are pleased with the Court's ruling."
Williams, along with Amy Robertson of Colorado's Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center <http://creeclaw.org/>, have been lead counsel on this
case.  Plaintiffs in the case are also represented by Lewis, Feinberg, Lee,
Renaker & Jackson, PC <http://www.lewisfeinberg.com/>; and Campins
Benham-Baker, LLP <http://cbbllp.com/>.
            For more information about this case, you can go to CCDC's
website <http://www.ccdconline.org/case/615
To receive CCDC Alerts, become a CCDC Member for free:
http://www.ccdconline.org/get-involved/join
Current members may view the Alerts archive at:
http://lists.ccdconline.org/private.cgi/alerts-ccdconline.org/
Like us on Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/CCDC.CO
Follow us on Twitter
https://twitter.com/CCDC501c3
655 Broadway, Suite 775
Denver, Colorado 80203
303-839-1775 Phone
303-839-1782 Fax
www.ccdconline.org Website


Alerts mailing list
Alerts at lists.ccdconline.org
http://lists.ccdconline.org/listinfo.cgi/alerts-ccdconline.org