[blindlaw] Purpose of the List

[don nepple]

hi is it all rite too just red emails if you are not in law. i like what i have red.thank don nepple.
 
> From: khagen12 at q.com
> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:18:32 -0600
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Purpose of the List
> 
> I agree with Tim. I did actually unsubscribe from this list for a while 
> because of the prolonged and personal debates that went on. I came back 
> because among all the chaff are a few kernels of very useful information.
> 
> I am on other lists where the moderator will simply step in at some point 
> and say: "discussion on this topic is now closed." Or sometimes they write 
> an e-mail directly to the parties involved off-list. And, if the personal 
> asides don't stop, they remove the instigators from the list. That's not 
> something anyone wants to do, but it may be necessary from time to time.
> Kathleen Hagen
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Ford, Tim (CDPH-OLS)" <Tim.Ford at cdph.ca.gov>
> To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 12:00 PM
> Subject: [blindlaw] Purpose of the List
> 
> 
> > My humble observation is that we have two completely different scenarios
> > when non-lawyers/law students are participating on this list.
> >
> > when someone who is not a lawyer or law student is involved, they
> > sometimes are genuinely asking for advice or guidance, and essentially
> > it is like a client consultation.
> >
> > The other situation is when the person is not interested in our advice,
> > but is instead interested in a debate on policy or social grounds. It
> > is this latter situation that I believe we need to better control,
> > because it tends to go around in circles, generates a ton of notes,
> > often turns heated, and is of limited interest or value to those of us
> > who are interested mainly in the direct legal aspects of life.
> >
> > Just my opinion of course, but I think we need to seriously consider how
> > to help keep the list more towards its intended purpose. Recently I
> > have come close to unsubscribing from the list, simply because there is
> > way too much traffic on tangential or unrelated notes, and it takes too
> > much time to read through all the strings looking for the pony.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Tim Ford
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org]
> > On Behalf Of Steve P. Deeley
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 7:56 AM
> > To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
> > Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Purpose of the List
> >
> > You are correct Joe. We probably need to watch some of the banter. I'm
> > guilty of that as well. Steve
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Joe Orozco" <jsorozco at gmail.com>
> > To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2009 9:58 AM
> > Subject: [blindlaw] Purpose of the List
> >
> >
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> For whatever it's worth, I appreciate the mix of attorneys and
> >> non-attorneys on the list. True, non-attorneys should be mindful that
> >
> >> our opinions will not always be appreciated by those actually
> >> practicing law, but practicing attorneys should also learn patience in
> >
> >> dealing with what I think is well-intentioned thoughts by those of us
> >> in other professions.
> >> Ultimately,
> >> I think it great that members have a place where they can pose legal
> >> questions for attorneys and even better that attorneys have a place to
> >
> >> give and take professional advice to their colleagues. Perhaps both
> >> sides just need to think about what they post before they post?
> >> Non-attorneys should be conscious of the fact that the list is
> >> primarily for attorneys and their needs and that our other questions
> >> will be answered as their time allows.
> >>
> >> Joe Orozco
> >>
> >> "A man who wants to lead the orchestra must turn his back on the
> >> crowd."--Max Lucado
> >>
> >>
> >> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> >> signature database 4155 (20090615) __________
> >>
> >> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> >>
> >> http://www.eset.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> blindlaw mailing list
> >> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> >> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> >> blindlaw:
> >> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/stevep.deele
> >> y%40insightbb.com
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > --------
> >
> >
> >
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.73/2180 - Release Date:
> > 06/16/09 07:41:00
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > blindlaw mailing list
> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> > blindlaw:
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/tim.ford%40cdp
> > h.ca.gov
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > blindlaw mailing list
> > blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> > blindlaw:
> > http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/khagen12%40q.com
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dnepple%40hotmail.com

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail® has ever-growing storage! Don’t worry about storage limits.
http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/Storage?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_Storage_062009