[blindlaw] FW: Law Students Report Positive Reaction to No-Laptop Policy, ABA Journal, March 5, 2009

[ckrugman at sbcglobal.net]

and for those of us blind or not who remember taking notes in courses before 
there were lap tops this says a lot. I think this could also carry in to 
professional practice as well where people have to actually remember what 
they learn because referring to notes or lap tops isn't always feasible.
Chuck
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Nightingale, Noel" <Noel.Nightingale at ed.gov>
To: <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:20 AM
Subject: [blindlaw] FW: Law Students Report Positive Reaction to No-Laptop 
Policy, ABA Journal, March 5, 2009


> Blindlaw listers:
>
> This article struck me as showing one edge blind law students and lawyers 
> may have over their sighted counterparts, who apparently need to look at 
> their screens rather than at the person who is speaking!
>
> Noel
>
>
>
> Link:
> http://www.abajournal.com/weekly/law_students_report_positive_reaction_to_no-laptop_policy
>
> Text:
> Law Students Report Positive Reaction to No-Laptop Policy
> Posted Mar 5, 2009
> By Debra Cassens Weiss
>
> A law professor who banned laptops in his first-year criminal law class 
> surveyed his students about their reaction-and found it was generally 
> positive.
>
> UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh had the results in a memo to his 
> collegues (PDF) and on his blog, The Volokh Conspiracy.
>
> Seventy-one percent of the students who responded reported the policy had 
> a strongly positive or slightly positive effect on their concentration in 
> class. Fifty-four percent said it had a positive effect on their overall 
> enjoyment of the course.
>
> Only 36 percent reported a positive influence on learning, though; 41 
> percent said the experience was neutral in regard to learning.
>
> One student pointed out that the experiment had a negative effect on 
> trees. The student's e-mail to Volokh said those who brief cases on their 
> computers have to print out their notes for class. And those who want 
> their class notes neatly typed and available on their laptop have to 
> transcribe classroom notes.
>
> While students were positive, Volokh said he noted no material differences 
> in classroom discussions. He suspects 1Ls tend to be engaged, and they 
> often find criminal law particularly interesting. He wonders if the 
> results would be different in classes with little voluntary class 
> participation.
>
> Earlier this week on Prawfsblawg, Howard Wasserman, an associate law 
> professor at Florida International University, noted that his own 
> classroom laptop ban was going better than he had hoped.
>
> "I never realized how much I missed eye contact," Wasserman wrote. "Even 
> the bored and checked-out students at least look up at me. And when 
> students have to look up, you can get a sense from their eyes as to 
> whether they are 'getting' what you were talking about and adjust 
> accordingly. I also never realized how loud keyboards are when 75 students 
> are typing simultaneously."
>
> He noted that he'll have to wait for class evaluations at the end of the 
> semester to see what his students think of the ban.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ckrugman%40sbcglobal.net