[blindlaw] nfb v. lsac complaint

[James Pepper]

Well I will make a default layout and send that instead. The problem here is
that the folks at the LSAT are actually using the wrong program to make
their PDFs. That program consistently makes errors for accessibility.

James Pepper

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 12:53 PM, T. Joseph Carter <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hence the reason for the lawsuit.
>
> Actually, you may be able to send them to Scott if he is representing the
> NFB on this issue for use as evidence demonstrating that LSAC CAN make the
> documents accessible, but has chosen not to.  I say may, because it seems
> like Copyright could not be a shield to prevent the court from seeing that
> the documents could be made accessible without substantial changes, if LSAC
> were to take minimal effort.  I'd suggest asking someone qualified, as I'm
> 0L.  ;)
>
> Joseph
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:45:10PM -0500, James Pepper wrote:
>
>> Well no wonder nothing becomes accessible. Stay with public domain
>> documents
>> then.  Oh well.
>>
>> James
>>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/b75205%40gmail.com
>