[blindlaw] nfb v. lsac complaint

[Joe Orozco]

What standard was used to determine the accessibility of the web site?

Joe Orozco
 

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org 
[mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of T. Joseph Carter
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 1:53 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] nfb v. lsac complaint

Hence the reason for the lawsuit.

Actually, you may be able to send them to Scott if he is 
representing the NFB on this issue for use as evidence 
demonstrating that LSAC CAN make the documents accessible, but 
has chosen not to.  I say may, because it seems like Copyright 
could not be a shield to prevent the court from seeing that the 
documents could be made accessible without substantial changes, 
if LSAC were to take minimal effort.  I'd suggest asking 
someone qualified, as I'm 0L.  ;)

Joseph

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 01:45:10PM -0500, James Pepper wrote:
>Well no wonder nothing becomes accessible. Stay with public domain 
>documents then.  Oh well.
>
>James

_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jsoroz
co%40gmail.com
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of 
virus signature database 3890 (20090226) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com
 
 

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 3890 (20090226) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com