[blindlaw] Multiple LSAT Scores

Locke Milholland lmilholland at hotmail.com
Sun Mar 15 22:08:05 UTC 2009


"Nor did it matter which ship could dock at which port on which day."
Except for that one torts case where the ship in the storm caused damage to 
the dock.  Had it not been for my Princeton LSAT review, I would have 
briefed the court ruled  choice A. instead of choice C.
j/k.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John " <joramsey at cox.net>
To: "'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Multiple LSAT Scores


> Hello Craig,
> Nor did it matter which ship could dock at which port on which day. As far
> as the reading comprehension sections were concerned, the articles were 
> dull
> and made me sleepy, but did not have any impact on my professor's being
> equally dull.
> Take care,
> John
>
> John A. Ramsey Jr., Esq.
>
> Gainesville, FL 32609
>
> Phone: (352) 505-6642
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Craig Borne
> Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2009 1:51 PM
> To: 'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Multiple LSAT Scores
>
>
> John,
>
> I agree.  Never in my 3 1/2 years of law school was I asked to calculate 
> how
> many green M and Ms would fit in a school locker.
>
> Craig
>
> Craig Borne
> Baltimore, Maryland
> "A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial
> appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in
> defense of custom."  --Thomas Paine, Common Sense
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of John
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 6:10 PM
> To: 'NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List'
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Multiple LSAT Scores
>
> It has been several years since I had the displeasure of taking the LSAT,
> but something I have always pondered about is this fictional belief that 
> the
> LSAT score is an accurate predictor of how a student will do in his first
> year of law school. I personally believe that it is not a predictor of
> anything, much less, how a person will perform in law school. I am sure 
> that
> there a thousand studies supporting and refuting this claim. I just find 
> it
> interesting. Take care, John
>
> John A. Ramsey Jr., Esq.
>
> Gainesville, FL 32609
>
> Phone: (352) 505-6642
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
> Behalf Of Angie Matney
> Sent: Saturday, March 14, 2009 5:17 PM
> To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
> Subject: [blindlaw] Multiple LSAT Scores
>
>
> Here's what UVA's web site says:
>
> What is your policy on multiple LSAT scores?
> The ABA requires law schools to report LSAT information using an admitted
> students highest score, so that is the score to which we give the most
> weight. We evaluate all information submitted as part of the application 
> for
> admission, however, including all scores earned on the LSAT. Studies by 
> the
> Law School Admission Council suggest that in most cases the average score 
> is
> the most accurate predictor of academic performance in the first year of 
> law
> school, so we encourage applicants with a significant difference in LSAT
> scores to include with their application any information that may be
> relevant to the interpretation of test results, such as illness, testing
> conditions, or other circumstances that may have affected LSAT 
> performance.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joramsey%40cox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cdborne%40gmail.co
> m
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/joramsey%40cox.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/lmilholland%40hotmail.com
> 





More information about the BlindLaw mailing list