[blindlaw] Fw: Reading Rights Coalition Urges Authorsto AllowEveryone Access to E-books
Jack Chen
jackchenonline at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 31 12:34:47 UTC 2009
How would the problem be stated best? Is it an issue with having to
register at all or is it a problem with the perception that such a
registration list would label individuals as disabled? My apologies if my
basic question offends anyone -- I'm just trying to understand the problem
better.
jack
----- Original Message -----
From: "T. Joseph Carter" <carter.tjoseph at gmail.com>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 7:56 AM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Fw: Reading Rights Coalition Urges Authorsto
AllowEveryone Access to E-books
>I think it's time we educate them. How do I wish I were in the area--I'd
>LOVE to be there.
>
> Joseph
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:12:57PM -0400, Chris Danielsen wrote:
>>The NFB has communicated directly with the Authors Guild. They have told
>>us
>>that they are willing for the TTS to be turned on for the disabled and no
>>one else if there is a national registry of those with print disabilities.
>>When we told them that this is unacceptable, they suggested that those who
>>want to have books read aloud should pay a surcharge.
>>
>>Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/jackchenonline%40hotmail.com
>
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list