[blindlaw] question for Alabama probate attorney

[ckrugman at sbcglobal.net]

Usually the executor is entitled to reasonable expenses in administering an 
estate in most states.
Chuck Krugman, M.S.W., Paralegal
1237 P Street
Fresno ca 93721
559-266-9237
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Fry" <mikefry79 at gmail.com>
To: "NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List" <blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 4:22 PM
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] question for Alabama probate attorney


> It depends on whether the executor is also a beneficiary.  If the executor
> is not a beneficiary, then the executor should get reimbursed for expenses
> and be paid a fee.  If the executor is also a beneficiary then, though it
> will be tougher, they should still get reimbursed for expenses.  I'm not 
> an
> expert on the subject.  This is just my opinion.
>
> Mike
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Mike Gilmore <m_b_gilmore at yahoo.com> 
> wrote:
>
>> How common is it for the executor of a will to be reimbursed for costs 
>> such
>> as phone calls and the like?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> blindlaw:
>>
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mikefry79%40gmail.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindlaw:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/ckrugman%40sbcglobal.net