[blindlaw] pet deposit

[A S]

>From what I have read, the DOJ specifically says that service dogs are not pets and, at least in hotels, cannot be charged a pet deposit.  They can charge for damage caused by a service dog, but not a pet depoist, from what I read.  I would just say that I don't have any pets.  An apartment complex that doesn't allow pets can't not allow a person with a service dog, so I would think the ssme principles apply.  If you are inclined to pay the depositas the only way to get the aparmtment, I would then make a complaint to the DOJ to get it back once you are in.




<blindlaw at nfbnet.org>
> Subject: [blindlaw] pet fee with a guide dog
> Message-ID: <46485162-0A5F-47B2-858A-AF570E2E08A3 at sbcglobal.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
> 
> I'm thinking of renting an apartment that is charging a $350 pet 
> deposit because of my guide dog. This is in the state of Oregon. 
> What are the fine points of law about this? My inclination is to pay 
> the deposit, because even if it were illegal to charge me, making a 
> big deal about it wouldn't get me the apartment, but I'm just curious 
> where I stand legally.
> Thanks, and have a great weekend!
> :)
> 
> Mark BurningHawk
> Skype and Twitter: BurningHawk1969
> Home: Http://MarkBurningHawk.net/
> Namaste!
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> 
> 
> End of blindlaw Digest, Vol 73, Issue 16
> ****************************************
 		 	   		  
_________________________________________________________________
The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your inbox.
http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID28326::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:042010_3