[blindlaw] Pimp My Cane
AZNOR99 at aol.com
AZNOR99 at aol.com
Sun Mar 28 23:57:31 UTC 2010
>From my perspective (and that of NFB training centers), I use a cane for my
own purposes, meaning I use it to learn about my environment, navigate
curbs and stairs, avoid obstacles, and generally move through the world
independently. This aspect has nothing to do with how others recognize the
cane, or else I'd be using an ID cane instead of a long white cane.
However, we are lawyers afterall, and we therefore examine the laws quite
literally. Thus Joe's question is a good one. Given that many of us use
the long white cane to navigate through our environment, using it as a tool
to learn what's in our paths, wouldn't such a tool be effective no matter
what color it was? I'd say it would, and Federationists such as Stacy,
Mazen, and Fatosh who runs the Nebraska Adjustment to Blindness Center would
agree. However, what are the legal implications of carrying a "long purple
cane" under state "white cane laws"? That's a terrific legal question.
I think perhaps you misunderstand why the NFB takes the position it does on
audible traffic signals and differently sized currency. Our position on
hybrid vehicles should provide proof that we are not as rigid as you
suggest. In fact, we believe that certain situations may indeed necessitate
changes; for example, we lose our ability to travel safely and independently if
we can no longer gauge traffic through sound, as hybrid vehicles eliminate
that sound. We can however use the sound of moving traffic and other
nonvisual techniques to cross streets (putting aside the issue of hybrids)
without audible traffic signals. In fact, many of us feel they alter the
environment to the point that they are more hindrance than help. Additionally,
we've been folding money and using other nonvisual techniques for literally
centuries, and it's worked just fine. Our point is that we would oppose
changes to the environment in which we live and do not wish others to bear
the burden of making changes for us whenever possible. If a system we use
works, then why demand that limited government resources be spent on
something that will just make us stand out even more despite the fact that we
don't need it? We'd rather those resources be spent on providing blind
students with an education equal to their sighted counterparts, to reduce the 70+%
unemployment rate for the blind, etc.
The long white cane is different. We need it to travel safely and
independently, and it doesn't alter the environment. The government isn't
spending resources to modify anything for us. Yes, it is true that the sighted
world has to recognize what a white cane means. But they also have to yield
to pedestrians as a rule anyway, so this is no large burden.
I hope that answers some of your questions.
Regards,
Ronza
In a message dated 3/28/2010 5:51:13 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
stone_troll at sbcglobal.net writes:
I'm following this thread, and I know a large percentage of the folks
here are NFB members; I personally a not, nor any organization, for
that matter. I find a bit of hypocrisy in this discussion: First the
NFB rails against things like audible cross walk signals and so on,
claiming that the blind don't need them, that it's not what the blind
"want," whatever. Same with identifiable currency. Now, however, I
hear a bunch of the same people saying, in effect, "I want to carry a
symbol of blindness! I want to proclaim my blindness to everyone so
that they can alter their behaviors appropriately in recognition of
the fact that I'm blind!" I should think the true spirit of the NFB
might be to use a black cane and give no indication whatsoever of
blindness, except on a purely voluntary basis. I just don't
understand this.
Mark BurningHawk
Skype and Twitter: BurningHawk1969
Home: Http://MarkBurningHawk.net/
Namaste!
_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/aznor99%40aol.com
More information about the BlindLaw
mailing list