[blindlaw] Research and screen readers

[Daniel K. Beitz]

I like the classic allot better myself.  Once you get used to it, it works
well.



-------------------------------------------
Daniel K. Beitz
Wienner & Gould, P.C.
950 University Dr., Ste. 350
Rochester, MI  48307
Phone:  (248) 841-9405
Fax:  (248) 652-2729
dbeitz at wiennergould.com
This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages
attached
to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged.  If
you are
not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering this
email
to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
copying,
or distribution or use of any of the information contained herein or
attached to
this email is strictly prohibited.  Should you receive this communication in
error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this email or by
telephoning
us at (248) 841-9400.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Olusegun --
Victory Associates LTD, Inc.
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2012 11:52 AM
To: schorschj at comcast.net; Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: Re: [blindlaw] Research and screen readers

I prefer using Westlaw Classic.  In my experience, it has worked far better
than Westlaw Next!

When I've logged into Westlaw Next, it was extremely to go past the I AGREE
radio button; a press of the <enter> key on the CONTINUE produced no
meaningful results or me and I was pretty frustrated until a Westlaw
research assistant urged me to try out the Classic and everything worked out
pretty well from there on.

Sincerely,
Olusegun
Denver, Colorado 


_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dbeitz%40wiennergould.
com