[blindlaw] "Question" Posting

[Mike Fry]

I don't see anything at all wrong with the post either. 

Sent from my iPad

On Oct 18, 2012, at 9:54 AM, "Daniel K. Beitz" <dbeitz at wiennergould.com> wrote:

> I didn't see anything wrong with the post.
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> Daniel K. Beitz
> Wienner & Gould, P.C.
> 950 University Dr., Ste. 350
> Rochester, MI  48307
> Phone:  (248) 841-9405
> Fax:  (248) 652-2729
> dbeitz at wiennergould.com
> This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages
> attached
> to it may contain confidential information that is legally privileged.  If
> you are
> not the intended recipient or the individual responsible for delivering this
> email
> to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
> copying,
> or distribution or use of any of the information contained herein or
> attached to
> this email is strictly prohibited.  Should you receive this communication in
> error,
> please notify us immediately by replying to the sender of this email or by
> telephoning
> us at (248) 841-9400.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindlaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Ross Doerr
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 12:45 PM
> To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
> Subject: [blindlaw] "Question" Posting
> 
> Hello List:
> 
> I am the one who posted the "question" about why disabled job seekers aren't
> being asked for binders full of their resumes to get more of "us" into the
> workplace. It was my blatant reference to a comment made during the
> presidential debate.
> 
> In view of the on list and off list reprimands I have received about the
> posting, I feel that I should go onto the list and apologize for posting
> what is, as it has been pointed out to me repeatedly, an off topic message.
> 
> I had thought that, in view of the underlying unemployment  issues that face
> those of us on the list, and those of us who regularly post job listings,
> such as myself and Noel Nightengale, that an idea to improve the employment
> situation would be net with some positive thought provocation.
> 
> Since I was wrong, I apologize to the list as a whole for my off topic
> posting. It will not happen again.
> 
> Ross A. Doerr Attorney at law
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/dbeitz%40wiennergould.
> com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/mikefry79%40gmail.com