[blindlaw] Threatening email signatures, Was: social skills training and work concerns

Fri Aug 23 01:58:41 UTC 2013

I would certainly be interested to know how enforceable something like
that actually is, particularly in this case.  Is it really illegal for
someone to choose to reveal confidential information about their own
case?  Whose confidentiality are they violating besides their own?

As most of you undoubtedly know, I am by no means an attorney, but I
am in the tech field, and see these sorts of disclaimers/threats
appended to emails all the time.  It is commonly believed that they
have little to no legal value, but I have no idea if that is accurate.

A quick Google search turns up the following semi-relevant page:
http://lifehacker.com/5790930/disclaimers-in-email-signatures-are-not-just-annoying-but-legally-meaningless

Aaron

On 8/22/13, Rod Alcidonis, Esquire <Attorney at alcidonislaw.com> wrote:
> Beth:
>
> This is printed in the bottom of the counselor's e-mail:
> "CONFIDENTIALITY  STATEMENT
> This email and any attachments from the Colorado Department of Human
> Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is
> addressed.  The information contained herein may include protected or
> otherwise privileged information.  Unauthorized review, forwarding,
> printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this message in error,
>
> please notify the sender by replying to this message and by deleting the
> email without further disclosure."
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beth Taurasi
> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 12:47 PM
> To: blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> Subject: Re: [blindlaw] social skills training and work concerns
>
> Check this out.  This is after a meeting and I'm filing a formal
> administrative appeal.
> Any help with a letter I'm drafting would be necessarily a great
> thing.
> Thanks, guys.
> Beth Taurasi
>
> ---- Original Message ------
> From: "Pennock - CDHS, Richele" <richele.pennock at state.co.us
> Subject: Re: social skills training and work concerns
> Date sent: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:53:10 -0600
>
> Hello there Beth,
> Thank you for your email.  As your DVR counselor, I have
> determined through
> observations from a team (Lila Papadaki, Tracy Rushing, Kristy
> Penk, Kris
> Graham and myself) that you presently do not have the social
> skills or
> ability to interact with others to the degree necessary to
> succeed in an
> employment setting.  We have recognized this as a barrier to
> employment.
> DVR counselors are trained to work with people with a wide range
> of
> disabilities to help them return to work by identifying the
> barriers
> presented by their disabilities and develop plans to help them
> overcome
> those barriers.  By not addressing barriers we would be setting
> the client
> up for failure.  In your situation, it has been determined that
> your social
> interactions with others will be perceived as a problem for
> employment.  I
> understand from our meeting yesterday and from this email that
> you are not
> in agreement with this feedback.  I am glad to hear that you have
> had some
> social skills training in the past and I would see that as
> helpful to help
> you build upon those skills.  I do not discount the training
> offered by the
> CCB but I do know time has past since then and we are evaluating
> your
> present social skills and interactions with others and recognize
> a need for
> additional training.  Again, we want to set you up to succeed.
>
> You asked about Kris Graham.  Kris Graham presently has a
> master's degree
> in rehabilitation.  As a DVR intern this summer she was finishing
> her final
> hours and worked under the supervision of a DVR employee.  Again,
> as stated
> in the meeting, the report she generated was a collaborative
> effort of the
> team of individuals who participated in your trial work
> experience here.
> Please be clear about which decision you are appealing:  the
> requirement
> of social skills training, trial work experience at Bayaud's GOST
> program
> etc.  I will attach the appeal rights to this email for your
> convenience.
> You may contact my supervisor Sam Mankin to discuss your
> concerns at
> 303-866-3559.
>
> Take Care,
> Richele Pennock
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Beth Taurasi
> <eataurasi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Richele,
>          I have concerns about the meeting yesterday.  I
> understand that
> you would like for me to take a social skills training whether
> one on one
> with Abbie Sjostrom or in a group, but I've already had some
> form of social
> skills training at CCB.  Why am I doing this again?  They would
> probably
> not have let me graduate had I not had real social skills as it
> were.  Why
> do you or anyone who submitted any reports/observations feel
> this is needed
> over again?
> Also, the report was drafted, written, and submitted by an
> intern who does
> not have real knowledge of dual disabled individuals.  I have no
> idea what
> the woman's credentials are and what she wants to do with her
> rehab
> counseling career.  She is also sighted, not blind, and has
> perceptions of
> blind people based on the same general state-run attitude that
> most
> epartments of vocational rehab have.
>          I am unsatisfied therefore I wish to appeal any such
> decision made.
> Sincyerely,
> Beth Taurasi
>
>
>
>
> --
> Richele Pennock
> Rehabilitation Counselor II
> Division of Vocational Rehabilitation
> Colorado Department of Human Services
> 2211 W. Evans Ave., Bldg B
> Denver, CO 80223
> T.  303-866-3168  F.  303-866-3491
> Email:  Richele.Pennock at state.co.us
> www.dvrcolorado.com
>
> DVR: Bridging Business & Ability
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY  STATEMENT
> This email and any attachments from the Colorado Department of
> Human
> Services, Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, are confidential
> and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which
> it is
> addressed.  The information contained herein may include
> protected or
> otherwise privileged information.  Unauthorized review,
> forwarding,
> printing, copying, distributing, or using such information is
> strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this
> message in
> error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and
> by deleting
> the email without further disclosure.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/attorney%40alcidonislaw.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/cannona%40fireantproductions.com
>