[blindlaw] Is blindness ever consitter an issue in court

[Bill Spiry]

The court's first duty is to ensure that the defendant gets a fair trial. If
accommodation is necessary for an attorney to adequately represent her
client, then I think the court has a duty to provide that reasonable
accommodation. In this case, accommodation might mean permitting the defense
attorney to take time to review and examine documentary evidence such as
photos or diagrams with a sighted assistant to get an effective description
of the images.

A denial by the court to provide a reasonable accommodation to an attorney
where that accommodation is necessary for the attorney to effectively
represent her client argueably could violate defendants rights under the 6th
and 14th amendment.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindlaw [mailto:blindlaw-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of RJ Sandefur
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 4:06 PM
To: NFBnet Blind Law Mailing List
Subject: [blindlaw] Is blindness ever consitter an issue in court

John Smith is a blind defence aturney. He is defending Mike shafer on murder
1 charges. The state has photos of the defendant at the crime seen. What
should the state do taking into consitteration the defence lawyer is blind
and is unable to see the pictures? RJ
_______________________________________________
blindlaw mailing list
blindlaw at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindlaw:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/b.s.spiry%40gmail.com