[blindlaw] cuts in SSDI benefits

[anitakeithfoust at gmail.com]

Wow!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jul 23, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Daniel McBride via blindlaw <blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> Listmates:
> 
> Here is a true example. The disabled person receiving SSDI benefits is
> blind. There is no known treatment or cure for the blindness. The SS
> administration contacted the SSDI recipient for a four year review, having
> scheduled a visit to a local ophthalmologist to verify that the recipient is
> still blind. The recipient called the SSA and brought it to their attention
> that the recipient is blind and that there is no treatment or cure. The SSA
> caseworker admitted a full understanding of the issue, but stated that "it
> is administration policy that we conduct a review and have you examined".
> This probably cost the SSA in the neighborhood of $150. Multiply this by the
> number of such useless reviews and you are probably talking a lot of money.
> If the SSA started by simply eliminating the needless, useless reviews, it
> just might give them the 19% they are looking for.
> 
> Otherwise, SSDI recipients have little to worry about as this gibberish is
> staged, pretentious saber rattling by worthless, pretentious elected
> officials who have nothing better to do with their highly over-compensated
> time. Has it ever occurred to the D.C. thugs that they could suffer a 19%
> cut in their $175,000 a year theifdoms, a 19% cut in their $250,000 annual
> retirement pay or that they stop exempting themselves from participation in
> the Social Security program and insider trading on the stock market? Well,
> the answer to that would be a resounding Hell NO! If they really did pass
> legislation to cut benefits by 19%, the same bill would contain a provision
> to give themselves a 19% pay raise.
> 
> Washington D.C. means Washington, District of Criminals and all of them are
> nothing but a pack of thieves. Everyone in the House, everyone in the Senate
> and everyone in the Executive Offices, from president down, are there for
> one reason and one reason only; to feather their own nests and rape we the
> people.
> 
> I know of brothels in Las Vegas that are more honorable institutions than
> the scum in Washington D.C.
> 
> Daniel McBride
> Fort Worth, Texas 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/anitakeithfoust%40gmail.com