[blindlaw] cuts in SSDI benefits

[Beth Taurasi]

Wow, Daniel, love that way you refered to Washington as "thugs" and 
"District of Criminals." lol Really makes more sense.  The President we 
only elected because he was African American, and it was a male we have 
currently in the White House.  Imagine the tide when we elect a blind 
person who represents the Little Guy.
Wow.
Beth

On 7/24/2015 4:39 PM, anitakeithfoust--- via blindlaw wrote:
> Wow!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jul 23, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Daniel McBride via blindlaw <blindlaw at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>
>> Listmates:
>>
>> Here is a true example. The disabled person receiving SSDI benefits is
>> blind. There is no known treatment or cure for the blindness. The SS
>> administration contacted the SSDI recipient for a four year review, having
>> scheduled a visit to a local ophthalmologist to verify that the recipient is
>> still blind. The recipient called the SSA and brought it to their attention
>> that the recipient is blind and that there is no treatment or cure. The SSA
>> caseworker admitted a full understanding of the issue, but stated that "it
>> is administration policy that we conduct a review and have you examined".
>> This probably cost the SSA in the neighborhood of $150. Multiply this by the
>> number of such useless reviews and you are probably talking a lot of money.
>> If the SSA started by simply eliminating the needless, useless reviews, it
>> just might give them the 19% they are looking for.
>>
>> Otherwise, SSDI recipients have little to worry about as this gibberish is
>> staged, pretentious saber rattling by worthless, pretentious elected
>> officials who have nothing better to do with their highly over-compensated
>> time. Has it ever occurred to the D.C. thugs that they could suffer a 19%
>> cut in their $175,000 a year theifdoms, a 19% cut in their $250,000 annual
>> retirement pay or that they stop exempting themselves from participation in
>> the Social Security program and insider trading on the stock market? Well,
>> the answer to that would be a resounding Hell NO! If they really did pass
>> legislation to cut benefits by 19%, the same bill would contain a provision
>> to give themselves a 19% pay raise.
>>
>> Washington D.C. means Washington, District of Criminals and all of them are
>> nothing but a pack of thieves. Everyone in the House, everyone in the Senate
>> and everyone in the Executive Offices, from president down, are there for
>> one reason and one reason only; to feather their own nests and rape we the
>> people.
>>
>> I know of brothels in Las Vegas that are more honorable institutions than
>> the scum in Washington D.C.
>>
>> Daniel McBride
>> Fort Worth, Texas
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindlaw mailing list
>> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindlaw:
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/anitakeithfoust%40gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> blindlaw mailing list
> blindlaw at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindlaw_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for blindlaw:
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindlaw_nfbnet.org/denverqueen1107%40comcast.net
>


-- 
This email is for Comcast info purposes or listserv mail only.  For personal contact, please email at the following emails
thebluesisloose at gmail.com personal email for friends and family only
eataurasi at gmail.com for immediate family and work only
For more on me, www.denverqueen.com