[Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to read?
Angie Matney
angie.matney at gmail.com
Fri Aug 7 10:00:39 UTC 2009
Interesting points. I just had an opportunity to test how fast I could read
aloud. I just took the Bar exam, and the proctor wanted me to read each
essay question aloud to her before I started work. This was new material,
and I could read at a very respectable speed. I don't know that I can read
silently as fast as a sighted person can read silently, but I can read new
material aloud as fast as a sighted person.
Angie
-----Original Message-----
From: blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
Behalf Of Matthew_2010
Sent: Friday, August 07, 2009 1:33 AM
To: Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics
Subject: Re: [Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to
read?
Wow, very nice message. I can definitely see your perspective since your
needs are similar but different, but I still feel reading Braille has
inherent physical limitations. Some believe a Braille reader can read as
fast as a sighted person, but I have noticed this is only or primarily true
for information that has already been learned. If a blind reader is given
unfamiliar text to read their proficiency drops and not necessarily due to
an inability to read Braille but rather the slower method of symbol
processing in using the fingers as opposed to the eyes that can see a
12-character word and instantly recognize it rather than waiting for the
finger to cross the length of the brailed word. This fault in the processing
of information gathered from the cutaneous senses accounts for delay in
reading proficiency. Is the ability to learn Braille important, I guess
there are its uses. Is 100% proficiency necessary, I don't think so--not
even 50%. ...I ordered a book from RFBD in regards to how to process
information from textbooks faster with more comprehension, and I found I
couldn't use it because it was asking me to do things I couldn't do quickly
such as the SQ3R method which demands the user quickly familiarize him or
herself with chapter headings and bolded terms and such but this would be
very time consuming if one read using Braille.
Matthew
----- Original Message -----
From: "Angie Matney" <angie.matney at gmail.com>
To: "'Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics'"
<blindmath at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to
read?
> Hi Matthew,
>
> I find the method you describe awkward because I feel that it interferes
> with my ability to perceive / connect with the audience. It sounds like it
> worked very well for you, and that's great. But I like being able to focus
> all of my auditory attention on the group I'm addressing. I'm by no means
> suggesting that you should learn Braille before giving a presentation; I'm
> just pointing out some problems that I had with this method. I used
> embossed
> and refreshable Braille when I taught calculus and other math classes
> during
> grad school. It felt like this allowed me to engage more with my students.
>
> You referred to the "slow reading and awkward pauses" of many Braille
> readers. Rather than highlighting a deficiency that is inherent in the
> modality, I think that these problems demonstrate the issues with our
> educational system. I can read pretty rapidly myself, but again, I was
> lucky. I received daily Braille instruction from the time I was four.
>
> The fact that I consider myself "lucky" to have received daily reading
> instruction in primary school is the problem.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org [mailto:blindmath-bounces at nfbnet.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Matthew_2010
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 11:59 PM
> To: Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics
> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to
> read?
>
> Now that I've had a little bit of time to think about this a bit more, I
> have indeed used my Braille display a couple of times. For a period of
> time
> I had to update a group of colleagues regarding business matters. I would
> have improvised the presentations but the numbers and stats were very
> important so I decided to begin using my portable Braille display. It was
> very frustrating and time consuming to navigate through the Braille during
> my presentations as well as when asked questions. Granted I could have
> improved but this meant lots of practice reading Braille, and I simply
> don't
>
> have the time for that. My solution? I simply typed up my notes in
> notepad,
> I transferred them to my note taker, and I attached an earpiece to the
> note
> taker. I was able to use the text reading commands on my note taker to
> quickly read, navigate, and search for all information requested. That
> single $10 earpiece I borrowed from my cell phone saved me hours of time
> learning how to read Braille as well as helping me scan all requested
> information during presentations. The key in my success was making the
> sentences to be read brief and inserting page breaks at points in the text
> where I would naturally pause anyways. These short phrases gave me plenty
> of
>
> time to store the information in short term memory from line to line
> therefore making my presentations flow without slow reading and awkward
> pauses as many Braille readers often do. I think this supports my
> contention
>
> that Braille is a must for all under all circumstances is simply not 100%
> true.
>
> Matthew
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matthew_2010" <Matthew_2010 at charter.net>
> To: "Blind Math list for those interested in mathematics"
> <blindmath at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 7:48 PM
> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to
> read?
>
>
>> Is it possible that 70% of blind people not reading raile is not due to
>> lack of proper instruction or incompetence and has more to do with the
>> need simply not being there? I have a Braille display and have never had
>> even the slightest desire to use it. I really don't think I'm missing
>> out,
>
>> but maybe some of you can help me out by informing me of what I'm missing
>> out on. My primary reason for not using my Braille display is that taking
>> my fingers off my keyboard to read the display seems like a time
>> consuming
>
>> additional step to what I can quickly do with the jaws cursor and alike.
>> I
>
>> didn't lose my vision till I was an adult so maybe these posts are more
>> relevant to the issue of blind children first learning to read.
>>
>> Matthew
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Jason White" <jason at jasonjgw.net>
>> To: <blindmath at nfbnet.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 06, 2009 6:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Blindmath] How many children in America are not taught to
>> read?
>>
>>
>>>> A braille display will give you instant access to a world of
>>>> information through your computer. You don't need to wait for anyone
>>>> to transcribe the text for you, it's there for the taking. I can't
>>>> think of a bigger incentive to get a child to learn braille!
>>>>
>>>
>>> I agree. If I had to name the single greatest braille-related invention
>>> of the
>>> last 50 years, it would have to be the refreshable braille display. I
>>> know
>>> high-speed braille embossers are also important and valuable, but I
>>> think
>>> refreshable braille is the technology that really stretches the bounds
>>> of
>
>>> what
>>> is possible.
>>>
>>> The Perkins brailler and similar devices are of course fundamental,
>>> dating
>>> from earlier in the twentieth century.
>>>
>>> There is a real need for further advances in the design of braille
>>> display
>>> hardware, leading, ideally, to devices that are not only more
>>> affordable,
>
>>> but
>>> capable of presenting a full page of text and graphics. This would make
>>> many
>>> mathematics applications much easier.
>>>> I should point out that some people have an irrational fear of
>>>> braille based on the notion that it makes them look more blind in
>>>> the eyes of the public. So money isn't the only factor.
>>>
>>> What makes this worse (and I'll take your word for it - I've never met
>>> any
>>> such person) is that it involves internalizing negative stereotypes
>>> about
>>> blindness. this list isn't the place to discuss those issues, however.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Blindmath mailing list
>>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>>> Blindmath:
>>>
>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/matthew_2010%40ch
> arter.net
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Blindmath mailing list
>> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
>> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>> Blindmath:
>>
>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/matthew_2010%40ch
> arter.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blindmath:
>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/angie.matney%40gm
> ail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Blindmath mailing list
> Blindmath at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> Blindmath:
>
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/matthew_2010%40ch
arter.net
_______________________________________________
Blindmath mailing list
Blindmath at nfbnet.org
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindmath_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
Blindmath:
http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindmath_nfbnet.org/angie.matney%40gm
ail.com
More information about the BlindMath
mailing list