[Blindtlk] [nabs-l] Fw:SenateIntroducesIndependentLivingAdministration
David Evans
drevans at bellsouth.net
Thu Jul 14 17:16:27 UTC 2011
Dear Cheryl,
The NFB has tried to get it removed before, several times in fact.
It is the very issue that the NFB came into being over.
The NFB first rose up to oppose this situation in the sheltered work shops
of the 1930's and was founded in 1940 as an organization opposed to
sub-minimum wages for Blind workers in sheltered shops.
This made the NFB the enemy to many state agencies, the American Foundation
for the Blind, the Lighthouses for the Blind and others who operated
sheltered work shops. The NFB was a threat to their little chiefdoms. Big
money was made for the sighted managers and operators of the sheltered
shops.
The NFB went so far as to try to help the workers organize and form a Blind
Workers Union, which the shops were very much afraid of.
The sheltered shops would use their influence over workers to get them to
disagree with the NFB every time the NFB would try to get the law over
turned.
When the Congress would be considering changing the law, the sheltered shops
would trot out their little group of Blind workers that would claim they
loved the work shop and all it did for them.
These workers would be rewarded with pay raises and perks while the majority
of the workers got nothing and if they did not support the work shop, they
got no work or support of any kind from even their state agency for the
Blind.
The work shops sold the Congress on the "Medical Model" of Blindness and
that work was really "therapy" for the Blind.
The workers were not even called "workers" but clients and pations as if
they were inmates of some kind of medical facility.
The shops would promote and reward some Blind workers with token jobs and
positions, but never give them any real power.
Now when hearings were held in Congress, the shops would bring their "dog
and pony show" out to tell the Congress that they loved everything and that
the shops gave them work and protected them.
This was in spite of incidents of physical and sexual abuse as well as out
right robbery of the "clients and Pations" of the shops.
We have documented cases of people being paid as little as 4 cents and hour
and even some where the shop claimed that the Blind worker owed the shop
money for such things as transportation, food, lodging, work clothes and
tools.
Now when the Civil Rights Movement came along in the mid 1950's and 60"s,The
NFB was one of the first organizations to come out and declare itself and
equal Opportunity Organization that was open to all person, regardless of
Race, Religion and National Origen.
Many shops already discriminated against Blacks, Jews and foreign born Blind
people, especially in the South and the Mid-West.
The shops used this fear of job loss to minorities to whip up opposition to
the Blindness Movement and to generate hate of the NFB.
Some State Affiliates, especially in the South and Mid-West did not want
Blacks, Jews and others serving and members of the Boards of Directors of
State Affiliates, chapters or even on the National Board of Directors. They
even threatened to pull out of the NFB over the Race Issue.
The sheltered shops, especially the American Foundation for the Blind and
the Lighthouses for the Blind, the operators of many sheltered shops saw
this as a opening to drive a wedge within the Blindness Movement and the NFB
in particular.
There began a period of upheaval with in the NFB as the sheltered shops
funded and encouraged racist elements within their shops and the local NFB
chapters and affiliates that Black, Jews and foreigners were going to take
their jobs.
The shops openly rewarded renegade members and there were several scandals
of missing funds, sexual abuse and even some beatings and harassment of of
NFB members who worked for sheltered shops.
Finally, there was a National Convention where the NFB declared that Black,
Jews and foreign born members would be allowed to serve on Boards of
Directors and that the NFB would support the Civil Rights of not just the
Blind, but of all People seeking Justice and Equality.
Questions were asked about missing State Affiliate and chapter funds and a
verbal fight triggered a organized walk out of some state affiliates,
chapters and individuals, that marched down the street, to another hotel,
where they organized themselves into the American Council of the Blind.
The hotel was set up and paid for by the operators of the sheltered shops,
in advance, and the whole things was designed to split up the NFB and the
organized Blind Movement.
The American Council of the Blind, for many years would not allow Blacks or
Jews to serve on the Boards of Directors of state affiliates or be members
of chapters.
The stress of all of this nastiness caused health problems for Doctor
Jernigan that almost killed him.
The ACB was embraced by many of the Lighthouses for the Blind, which, in the
case of some, still fund, support and provide places for them to meet to
this day.
The times have changed now and sheltered work shops have reduced in numbers
by better Blindness training, technology and competition from foreign
manufactures. The number of shops has come down from nearly 9,000 in the
1930's to about 1,000 today.
We get an opportunity, every few years, as wages, workforce and bills such
as the Rehab Act of 1973 come up for renewal or changes are considered to
them.
If things stayed as they are now, it would not be too bad, but the changes
that are proposed would, again, make it the norm for state agencies to
settle for placing Blind people into sheltered shops instead of helping them
to seek and reach substantial gainful employment. As many of these
sheltered shops, like those of the Lighthouses are used to provide the
training to Blind people seeking to become employed. What do you think will
happen to the level of training and the opportunity to seek outside gainful
competitive employment?
The sheltered shops will become again, as they were and still are in some
places, be the dumping grounds for state agencies where the productivity of
your average rehab counselor is based on how many cases they close. The
counselors tend to lean toward the easiest paths and try to place clients in
the very first job they can find and get them off their books. They many
times do not care that you can not live on the wages being paid for that
job. You never get a chance to learn, gain experience or have a real
opportunity to better yourself or reach your potential.
If you want to read about the Blindness Movement and what really happened,
get the book,"Walking Alone and Marching Together," from the Talking Book
Libraries.
David Evans, NFBF and GD Jack.
----- Original Message -----
From: "cheryl echevarria" <cherylandmaxx at hotmail.com>
To: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] [nabs-l]
Fw:SenateIntroducesIndependentLivingAdministration
>I don't think many realize that it has been there since 1938, not all
>establishments know about it, but some of the state services for the blind
>do, as well as other disabilities as well.
>
> We are trying to have it removed all together and not re-elected upon.
>
> My questions is on this, and my husband has the same issue. If it has been
> there since 1938, they why have we waiting until 2011 to fight on it.
>
> I was at convention, and my husband who is not blind was watching our
> convention streaming online, and mind you I definitely am behind having
> removed from the Workforce laws, but at the same time, why wait this long.
>
> Leading the Way in Independent Travel!
>
> Cheryl Echevarria
> http://www.echevarriatravel.com<http://www.echevarriatravel.com/>
> 631-456-5394
> reservations at echevarriatravel.com<mailto:reservations at echevarriatravel.com>
>
> Affiliated as an Independent Contractor with Montrose Travel
> CST-1018299-10
>
> Affiliated as an Independent Contractor with Absolute Cruise & Travel,
> Inc.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Humberto Avila<mailto:avila.bert.humberto2 at gmail.com>
> To: 'Blind Talk Mailing List'<mailto:blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 6:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] [nabs-l] Fw:
> SenateIntroducesIndependentLivingAdministration
>
>
> I also strongly, very strongly appose the section 511 of the bill. If
> that section passes, then the government will make us think about them
> that we are unable to work and that we are feared and pitied. That is not
> acceptable and must be vetoed.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org<mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org>
> [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris Nusbaum
> Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 8:55 AM
> To: Blind Talk Mailing List; nfbmd at nfbnet.org<mailto:nfbmd at nfbnet.org>;
> acb-chat at acb.org<mailto:acb-chat at acb.org>;
> acb-l at acb.org<mailto:acb-l at acb.org>
> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] [nabs-l] Fw: Senate
> IntroducesIndependentLivingAdministration
>
> I agree, and don't know why ACB is supporting the bill. You just
> can't understand them sometimes! :) I strongly oppose Section 511
> and have emailed my Senator.
>
> Chris
>
> "A loss of sight, never a loss of vision!" (Camp Abilities motto)
>
> The I C.A.N. Foundation helps visually impaired youth in
> Maryland have the ability to confidently say "I can!" How? Click
> on this link to learn more and to contribute:
> www.icanfoundation.info<http://www.icanfoundation.info/> or like us on
> Facebook at I C.A.N.
> Foundation.
>
>
>
> Sent from my BrailleNote
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Evans" <drevans at bellsouth.net<mailto:drevans at bellsouth.net>
> To: "Blind Talk Mailing List"
> <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>,"NFBMD<mailto:blindtlk at nfbnet.org%3E,%22NFBMD> list"
> <nfbmd at nfbnet.org<mailto:nfbmd at nfbnet.org>>,
> <acb-chat at acb.org<mailto:acb-chat at acb.org>>,
> <acb-l at acb.org<mailto:acb-l at acb.org>
> Date sent: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 23:09:51 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] [nabs-l] Fw: Senate Introduces
> IndependentLivingAdministration
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> I have one question? Have you looked at Section 511 and it's
> implications?
> This section, which ties together with the Rehab Act, will allow
> for the
> paying of sub-minimum wages to the disabled, including the Blind,
> in
> sheltered work shops and state agencies.
> It even sets it up that sub-minimum wages should be the normal
> way of doing
> business.
> This will do nothing but set up disabled people to be the slaves
> of the
> sheltered work shops working for pennies on the dollar and
> allowing the
> sheltered shops to pay large salaries to upper management and
> prevent any
> possibility of advancement by disable workers into the positions
> of
> supervision or management. It will create a dumping ground that
> will
> eliminate the ability of disabled people being able to seek work
> in and at
> competitive wages.
> I support the basic bill, but am absolutely opposed to section
> 511.
> The National Federation of the Blind is very much opposed to this
> section
> and so should you be also.
> Why should we be supporting letting people exploit and earn huge
> salaries
> on the back of the disabled. Please urge that section 511 be
> struck from the
> bill.
>
> David Evans, NFBF and GD Jack.
> President Palm Beach County Chapter
> National Federation of the Blind
> Board of Directors of the Florida Outreach Center for the Blind.
> Retired Nuclear/Aerospace Materials Engineer
> Builder of the Lunar Rovers and the F-117 Stealth Fighter
> MV Transit Consumer Advocate
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Chris Nusbaum"
> <dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com<mailto:dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com>
> To: "Blind Talk list" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org<mailto:blindtlk at nfbnet.org>>;
> "NFBMD list"
> <nfbmd at nfbnet.org<mailto:nfbmd at nfbnet.org>>;
> <acb-chat at acb.org<mailto:acb-chat at acb.org>>;
> <acb-l at acb.org<mailto:acb-l at acb.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 12:44 PM
> Subject: [Blindtlk] [nabs-l] Fw: Senate Introduces Independent
> LivingAdministration
>
>
>
>
> ---- Original Message ------
> From: Anmol Bhatia <anmolpbhatia at yahoo.com<mailto:anmolpbhatia at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [nabs-l] Fw: Senate Introduces Independent Living
> Administration
> Date sent: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 11:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
>
>
>
>
> --- On Sun, 7/3/11, Lissner, Scott
> <Lissner.2 at OSU.EDU<mailto:Lissner.2 at OSU.EDU>> wrote:
>
> From: Lissner, Scott <Lissner.2 at OSU.EDU<mailto:Lissner.2 at OSU.EDU>
> Subject: Senate Introduces Independent Living Administration
> To: NDSU at LISTSERV.UIC.EDU<mailto:NDSU at LISTSERV.UIC.EDU>
> Date: Sunday, July 3, 2011, 11:08 AM
> **Accessibility information at
> bottom**
>
> 젨?National Council on Independent Living -
> 6/24/11
> Senate Introduces Independent Living Administration!
> The National Council on Independent Living (NCIL) is very
> proud and
> excited to announce that a bill has been filed with the
> Senate HELP
> Committee which creates the establishment of a new
> Independent Living
> Administration (ILA), and strengthens America's Independent
> Living (IL)
> Program. The ILA would elevate the IL Program at the
> federal level, and
> would create an organization independent of the
> Rehabilitation Services
> Administration (RSA) within the Department of Education.
> The creation of
> this new administration marks a truly historic moment in
> the Independent
> Living Movement, and IL advocates across the country have
> much to
> celebrate this week.
> The ILA is created through the reauthorization of the
> Rehabilitation Act
> of 1973, which is contained in the larger Workforce
> Investment Act
> (WIA). NCIL has been pushing for the reauthorization of WIA
> and the
> Rehabilitation Act for nearly a decade, and the
> introduction of a bill
> to reauthorize both pieces of legislation presents a unique
> opportunity
> to improve the IL Program and substantially increase
> consumer-control at
> the federal level.
> NCIL is optimistic about WIA's chances for reauthorization,
> and very
> pleased with the rare bipartisan effort to put this bill
> together. Staff
> from the offices of Senators Tom Harkin (D-IA), Michael
> Enzi (R-WY),
> Patty Murray (D-WA), and Johnny Isakson (R-GA) have been
> working over
> the past two years in an effort to renew and improve WIA.
> NCIL has been working closely with the Senate to create
> legislative
> language that will drastically overhaul America's IL
> Program, and fix
> problems that have frustrated Centers for Independent
> Living (CILs) and
> Statewide Independent Living Councils (SILCs) for years.
> Although the
> majority of IL fixes and enhancements in this legislation
> cannot be
> listed, here are some of the highlights:
> *젨?Creation of an ILA: a new organization
> within the Department of
> Education, completely separate and independent of RSA. The
> ILA Director
> will report directly to the Secretary of Education.
> *젨?Carryover Authority: CILs will now be
> allowed to carryover Part
> C funds not spent during the first year into a second
> year.
> *젨?Addition of a 5th Core Service:
> transitioning people with
> disabilities from nursing homes and other institutions to
> home and
> community-based residences.
> *젨?Clarification of the Role of
> SILC:?Because of RSA's
> interpretations of the Rehabilitation Act, several
> clarifications
> regarding SILC activities are included in the bill -
> providing advice
> and assistance to the designated state unit (DSU),
> facilitating the
> improvement and coordination of services, resource
> development
> activities, and carrying out systems advocacy functions.
> *젨?Funding Formula Change: Part C dollars
> should be allowed to be
> shared among all states and territories, states with the
> largest
> populations would receive more funding proportionally.
> *젨?Accessibility at WIA One-Stop Centers:
> one-stop centers will be
> required to be physically and programmatically accessible,
> regardless of
> disability.
> After reading the legislative language in the bill
> reauthorizing WIA and
> the Rehabilitation Act, it is obvious that the Senate has
> listened to
> NCIL's concerns and worked hard to create a piece of
> legislation that
> will empower and increase the independence of Americans
> with
> disabilities. It is also clear that we have the bipartisan
> support
> necessary to move this bill forward, but the fight to get
> the votes
> necessary in both chambers of Congress to pass this
> reauthorization into
> law has only just begun.?
> More than ever, IL advocates from across the country must
> now mobilize
> to push this historic legislation through Congress.
> Remember, this bill
> was created for us! We must immediately employ the full
> resources of the
> IL community to reach out to members of Congress and urge
> them to
> support the reauthorization of WIA and the Rehabilitation
> Act,
> specifically the inclusion of Title V language that creates
> an ILA and
> strengthens independent living.
> Our unique opportunity to advance is now, and the time for
> action is
> today. Our first order of business is to get this through
> the Senate
> HELP Committee. This bill is moving very rapidly, and is
> scheduled for
> markup on June 29th. We need advocates to call Senators on
> this
> committee (see list below) and ask for their committed
> support for
> reauthorizing WIA and the Rehabilitation Act. If we are
> successful in
> our efforts, we will achieve one of the greatest
> advancements in the
> history of the Independent Living Movement.
> Remember:
> *젨?The creation of the ILA does not
> require any new or additional
> funding.
> *젨?The creation of the ILA does not create
> unnecessary new
> bureaucracy. It simply streamlines the IL Program and
> enhances
> consumer-control.
> NCIL's Rehab Act & IL Funding Subcommittee has worked
> incredibly hard
> over the last few weeks, months, and years to bring us to
> this point. We
> thank them for their efforts and congratulate them on the
> successful
> inclusion of NCIL's priorities in WIA that will now begin
> passage
> through Congress. Although most of our suggestions were
> adopted by the
> HELP Committee at the time of this legislation's
> publication, the NCIL
> Rehab Act & IL Funding Subcommittee submitted comments
> suggesting
> further revisions to the bill.
> Resources:
> *젨?NCIL Rehab Act & IL Funding
> Subcommittee Comments
>
> <http://www.ncil.org/news/rehabactcomments.doc<http://www.ncil.org/news/rehabactcomments.doc>>?
> (Word document)
> *젨?Redline (Marked Up) Legislative
> Language
>
> <http://www.ncil.org/news/ILARedline.doc>?(Word<http://www.ncil.org/news/ILARedline.doc%3E?(Word>
> document)
> Follow this discussion and new developments on NCIL's
> Facebook page
>
> <http://www.facebook.com/NationalCouncilonIndependentLiving<http://www.facebook.com/NationalCouncilonIndependentLiving>
> .
> If you have any questions, please contact NCIL Policy
> Analyst Austin
> Walker at (202) 207-0334 (toll-free: 1 (877) 525-3400),
> ext. 1008.
> Austin can also be reached by e-mail at
> austin at ncil.org<mailto:austin at ncil.org>.
> Democrats by Rank
> *젨?Tom Harkin (IA)
> <http://harkin.senate.gov/<http://harkin.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-3254
> *젨?Barbara A. Mikulski (MD)
> <http://mikulski.senate.gov/<http://mikulski.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-4654
> *젨?Jeff Bingaman (NM)
> <http://bingaman.senate.gov/<http://bingaman.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-5521
> *젨?Patty Murray (WA)
> <http://murray.senate.gov/<http://murray.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-2621
> *젨?Bernard Sanders (I) (VT)
> <http://sanders.senate.gov/<http://sanders.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-5141
> *젨?Robert P. Casey, Jr. (PA)
> <http://www.casey.senate.gov/<http://www.casey.senate.gov/>
> : (202)
> 224-6324
> *젨?Kay R. Hagan (NC)
> <http://www.hagan.senate.gov/<http://www.hagan.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-6342
> *젨?Jeff Merkley (OR)
> <http://www.merkley.senate.gov/<http://www.merkley.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-3753
> *젨?Al Franken (MN)
> <http://www.franken.senate.gov/<http://www.franken.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-5641
> *젨?Michael F. Bennet (CO)
> <http://bennet.senate.gov/<http://bennet.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-5852
> *젨?Sheldon Whitehouse (RI)
> <http://whitehouse.senate.gov/<http://whitehouse.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-2921
> *젨?Richard Blumenthal (CT)
> <http://blumenthal.senate.gov/<http://blumenthal.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-2823
> Republicans by Rank
> *젨?Michael B. Enzi (WY)
> <http://www.enzi.senate.gov/<http://www.enzi.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-3424
> *젨?Lamar Alexander (TN)
> <http://www.alexander.senate.gov/<http://www.alexander.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-4944
> *젨?Richard Burr (NC)
> <http://www.burr.senate.gov/<http://www.burr.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-3154
> *젨?Johnny Isakson (GA)
> <http://www.isakson.senate.gov/<http://www.isakson.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-3643
> *젨?Rand Paul (KY)
> <http://www.paul.senate.gov/<http://www.paul.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-4343
> *젨?Orrin G. Hatch (UT)
> <http://www.hatch.senate.gov/<http://www.hatch.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-5251
> *젨?John McCain (AZ)
> <http://www.mccain.senate.gov/<http://www.mccain.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-2235
> *젨?Pat Roberts (KS)
> <http://www.roberts.senate.gov/<http://www.roberts.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-4774
> *젨?Lisa Murkowski (AK)
> <http://www.murkowski.senate.gov/<http://www.murkowski.senate.gov/>> :
> (202)
> 224-6665
> *젨?Mark Kirk (IL)
> <http://www.kirk.senate.gov/<http://www.kirk.senate.gov/>> : (202)
> 224-2854
> 젨?
>
> 젨?
>
> L. Scott Lissner, Ohio State University ADA Coordinator,
> Office Of Diversity And Inclusion
> ?Associate, John Glenn School of Public Affairs
> ?Lecturer, Knowlton School of Architecture, Moritz
> College of Law &
> Disability Studies
> ?President Elect & Chair, Public Policy
> Committee, Association on
> Higher Education And Disability
> ?Chair, ADA-OHIO
> ?Member,?Ohio Governor's Council For People
> With Disabilities
> ?Member, Columbus Advisory Council on Disability
> Issues
>
> (614) 292-6207(v); (614) 688-8605(tty) (614)
> 688-3665(fax);
> Http://ada.osu.edu<http://ada.osu.edu/>
> <http://ada.osu.edu/<http://ada.osu.edu/>
>
> 젨?
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> If you are having trouble accessing this listserv please
> contact Joe Hall at jozhall at gmail.com<mailto:jozhall at gmail.com>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> ACCESS IS A CIVIL RIGHT!! Please DO NOT forget to include a
> topic in the subject of every message you send to the NDSU
> listserv.
>
> NDSU List Topics: CURR, ORG, GOV, DS, and ANN.
>
> CURR: for current events. Education about current issues.
> ORG: for discussions of organizing. Practical education.
> GOV: Includes legislative, judicial, and executive
> information, organization, and calls to action on government
> issues. Political education.
> DS: for discussions of disability as a political and
> cultural issue. Theoretical education.
> ANN: for any general announcements and housekeeping,
> including discussions concerning accessibility.
>
> If you would like to change the topics that you are
> currently subscribed to, go to:
>
> http://listserv.uic.edu/htbin/wa?LMGT1<http://listserv.uic.edu/htbin/wa?LMGT1>
>
> For more information on NDSU visit:
> www.disabledstudents.org<http://www.disabledstudents.org/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nabs-l mailing list
> nabs-l at nfbnet.org<mailto:nabs-l at nfbnet.org>
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/nabs-l_nfbnet.org>
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
> for nabs-l:
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nu<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/nabs-l_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nu>
> sbaum%40gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org<mailto:blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org>
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
> info for
> blindtlk:
>
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/drevans<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/drevans>
> %40bellsouth.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org<mailto:blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org>
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
>
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/cherylandmaxx%40hotmail.com<http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/cherylandmaxx%40hotmail.com>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> blindtlk:
> http://www.nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/drevans%40bellsouth.net
>
More information about the BlindTlk
mailing list