[Blindtlk] Resolution that didn't pass about apple

[David Andrews]

While I don't want to go out of my way to alienate Apple, I would 
also say that they bring new meaning to the expression "control 
freak," so of course they would object to anyone trying to tell them 
what they should or shouldn't do.

Dave

At 10:33 AM 9/4/2011, you wrote:
>Also, Joseph, please let the accessibility people at Apple know that 
>the second resolution regarding Apple failed by quite a wide margin.
>  Frankly, I'm beginning to get rather a sauer taste in my mouth over this.
>
>
>Sincerely,
>The Constantly Barefooted Ray!!!
>
>Now a very proud and happy Mac user!!!
>
>Skype name:
>barefootedray
>
>Facebook:
>facebook.com/ray.foretjr.1
>
>
>
>On Sep 4, 2011, at 10:06 AM, lsterling0 wrote:
>
> > Hi Joseph, if you have the ear of someone at Apple let them know 
> the NFB does not speak for all blind individuals. Yes I agree with 
> many of its ideas but not all. So Apple should not stop working for 
> accessibility because of a few.
> > If the truth were known there are probably more blind individuals 
> that do not belong to any group. Is Apple ready to lose their money 
> because of the NFB stance?
> >
> > As for the Google verses Apple that is truly a shame and one 
> reason individuals give the NFB a bad rappe. If the group doesn't 
> come down on one company because they get money from them and lets 
> another alone because they get money or some other type of 
> incentive it really looks bad to outsiders.
> > Thanks for listening to my ideas.
> > Louana Sterling
> > Owner of vipspouses a list for visually impaired and blind 
> individuals to discuss frustrations in their lives.
> > for an invertation To join contact
> > lsterling0 at gmail.com