[Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

Chris Nusbaum dotkid.nusbaum at gmail.com
Fri Sep 14 21:32:11 UTC 2012


Awesome! Welcome to the Federation!!

Chris



 ----- Original Message -----
From: Jasmine Kotsay <jasmine.kotsay at gmail.com
To: Lloyd Rasmussen <lras at sprynet.com>,Blind Talk Mailing List 
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:01:06 -0700
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

Wow! :) That's an interesting history! I love learning about 
these
things.  I'm just learning a few things about the Federation, and 
I
love gaining a broader knowledge of anything I can.  :)
So, thanks!

On 9/10/12, Lloyd Rasmussen <lras at sprynet.com> wrote:
 Harvey Lauer, from the Veteran's Administration Hines 
Rehabilitation Center

 was involved in studying and promoting the Stereotoner in the 
early 1970s.
 In an article he wrote for the Monitor, he described an earlier 
device
 called the Optophone, which may date back to 1913.  The 
Stereotoner had a
 camera with a single column of photo sensors, each controlling 
the volume of

 a tone of a particular pitch.  Like the Optacon, you had to 
hand-track the
 camera across the print in order to read anything.  You can make 
the vOICe
 program act somewhat like a stereotoner, but tracking a camera 
across print

 might be difficult to simulate.  After a while it became 
apparent that the
 Optacon, though more expensive, was also better for most users.  
I think that

 both devices used some integrated circuits and some discrete 
transistors,
 since the IC was invented around 1959.

 It's hard for young people to imagine this, but around 1971-1973 
the only
 exhibits at NFB national conventions, besides literature, were 
by
 Telesensory Systems, the maker of the Optacon, and the BED-3 
braille
 embosser by Triformation Systems, which slowly produced braille 
on paper
 tape.  The Optacon  was the first electronic aid that captured 
the attention

 of a lot of blind people.  In the 1950s people began to send 
their computer

 output to line printers in such a way that they could get a 
poor-quality
 braille printout.  By 1967, Mike Freeman, while at Reed College, 
programmed

 its computer so that he could hear its output in Morse Code 
through an FM
 radio in the computer room.  In 1968, programmers at 
Lawrence-Livermore
 Laboratories hooked one of their computers to an 
analog-to-digital converter

 and audio amplifier so the output could be spelled out for Jim 
Willows.  By

 1971 the Votrax speech synthesizer began to be developed by an 
engineer in
 Michigan.

 In 1975 Master Specialties sold a talking scientific calculator 
for $2,500.

 In 1976 TSI sold their Speech Plus four-function talking 
calculator for
 merely $400.  And in 1975, Alan Schlank was sent to Boston to 
get a
 demonstration of a rumored reading machine being developed by 
someone named

 Raymond Kurzweil.  So by 1980 a small but growing number of 
technology
 exhibits were at the NFB conventions.  The rest is history.


 -----Original Message-----
 From: Hyde, David W.  (ESC)
 Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 8:45 AM
 To: 'Lloyd Rasmussen' ; 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

 Lloyd, I haven't seen this device, but it reminds me a bit of a 
short lived

 reading device called a stereotoner.  As I remember it, this 
thing gave each

 printed letter an acoustical pitch, and it is alleged that some 
people used

 it to read printed material.

 -----Original Message-----
 From: blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org 
[mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
 Behalf Of Lloyd Rasmussen
 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 10:02 PM
 To: Blind Talk Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

 the vOICe is not really a device, but it uses devices you may 
already have.
 If you have a webcam connected to your PC, or if you have it 
look at your
 screen or the active window or the area around the mouse 
pointer, it
 converts the image into a "soundscape" which is an audio signal, 
rescanned
 every two seconds, which represents the image.  Probably best 
used with
 stereo headphones.  In this representation, an imaginary 
vertical line scans

 across the image from left to right.  At each instant, tones are 
generated
 with highest pitch being toward the top of the image, and with 
volume of
 each pitch corresponding to the brightness of the image at that 
point.  By
 default, 64 different frequencies are generated, and 176 
vertical lines
 constitute a two-second scan.  A single vertical line would 
sound like a
 burst of noise.  A horizontal line sounds like a tone of 
constant pitch
 which lasts the whole 2 seconds, which pans from left to right 
in your
 headphones.  A print capital V would sound like a tone which 
falls and then

 rises in pitch, repeated every two seconds.  You can adjust most 
of the
 parameters of how the image is sonified, including zooming it, 
changing the

 scan rate, reversing the video, filtering by one color, etc.

 It's a small Windows executable.  People who really get into 
this obtain a
 webcam that is built into a pair of glasses, put a portable 
computer in a
 backpack (providing for enough ventilation), run the software 
with speech
 recognition, and walk around the house or the area learning how 
to
 distinguish objects, learning about how occlusion and parallax 
work, etc.

 Whereas the Optacon was a direct translation aid (the human has 
to do all
 the work of interpreting what the camera sees) for printed 
material, the
 vOICe is probably most useful as a direct translation aid for 
sensing the
 environment or quick rendering of images that appear on a PC.  
Like the
 Optacon, it takes lots and lots of practice to get good at using 
it, and it

 remains mostly a subject for experimentation rather than a tool 
that a lot
 of blind people are using in their daily lives.  It would not be 
a good
 travel aid, in my opinion, because you need to hear 
environmental sounds and

 the time to recognize a scene is long.  And Peter Meijer, the 
author, is
 careful not to make any claims that it would be a good 
substitute for a cane

 or guide dog.  The first version, run in dedicated hardware, is 
now 20 years

 old.  I think that the Windows executable is about 15 years old 
(undergoes
 continuous improvements).  An Android  version has been in 
Google Play for
 about 2 years.  He also did one for Simbian cell phones, but 
these are
 disappearing from the market.

 This is probably more than you wanted to know, but I think it is
 fascinating.  www.seeingwithsound.com .
 Lloyd Rasmussen, Wheaton, MD, W3IUU
 -----Original Message-----
 From: Chris Nusbaum
 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 10:22 PM
 To: 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

 Hi Roger,

 I've heard of this device, but I don't think it works quite like 
the
 Optacon.  From what I read about it, it seemed like some kind of 
device that

 simulated the sense of sight by making the blind person feel 
like he/she is

 seeing the object being detected by the VOICE.  I was kind of 
intrigued by
 this technology, but couldn't quite wrap my head around how it 
works.  I
 would be interested to hear any firsthand accounts of how the 
technology
 works from anybody who has actually used the device.  By the 
way, I read
 about this device in an article in the Matilda Ziegler magazine 
a few months

 ago.

 Chris

 -----Original Message-----
 From: blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org 
[mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
 Behalf Of Roger devin Prater
 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 9:35 PM
 To: Blind Talk Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction

 Hmm, have any of you tried the vOICe? http://seeingwithsound.com 
It works,
 as far as I know about the opticon, like it, only it uses sound 
instead of
 tactiles, and is free.  http://seeingwithsound.come just in case 
I misspelled

 it the first time, LOL.
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Mike Freeman" <k7uij at panix.com
 To: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 Cc: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2012 8:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] devices RE: introduction


 Absolutely not! Translation into Braille means the unit would be
 telling you what it think it sees, not letting you interpret for
 yourself what the unit sees.

 Mike



 _______________________________________________
 blindtlk mailing list
 blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account 
info for
 blindtlk:
 
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/jasmine.kot
say%40gmail.com



--
"Blindness is not what defines me, yet there are many things that 
do."
Jasmine Kotsay, 2007

_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
for blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nusb
aum%40gmail.com




More information about the BlindTlk mailing list