[Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

[justin williams]

That's right; person with a visual impairment; person first language.  

-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Christine
Szostak
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:38 PM
To: Blind Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

Hi,
  I suspect that actually the issue was not really with the term visually
impaired, but rather with the order. When you say a "visually impaired
person" the disability comes first as  opposed to saying a "person with a
visual impairment". Thus, having the disability first is objected to, at
least this is what I am assuming the blogger was getting at.
Happy Friday!
Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelby Carlson" <kelbycarlson at gmail.com>
To: <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:24 PM
Subject: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired


> Hi everybody!
>
> So, since I'm not aware of any incendiary debates flaring up around here 
> recently, I thought I'd bring up something I read recently that I found 
> utterly baffling.  This was on a blog thread about proper etiquette around

> people with disabilities.  Towards the end, a discussion of language 
> appropriateness came up, and someone said that "visually impaired" was an 
> unacceptable term that should not be used.  Instead, one should say "with 
> a visual impairment." I have heard similar things regaring the phrasing of

> a "blind person" versus "a person with blindness", but this was especially

> perplexing because I can't recall ever meeting someone in my entire life 
> who was opposed to the term "visually impaired", at least when it was used

> to describe someone who had some functional vision.  I don't have strong 
> feelings either way, but I would actually lean more to towards preferring 
> visually impaired than "partially sighted", though I think neither one is 
> more linguistically accurate than the other.
>
> I have encountered the issue of language surrounding disability many 
> times, and it's always been a bit strange-don't we, as blind people (among

> other people with various kinds of disabilities) have higher priorities on

> our lists of "things to fix in the world"? These are just my thoughts on 
> the matter.
>
> Kelby S.  Carlson
>
> Vanderbilt University
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
> blindtlk:
>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/szostak.1%40buckeyemai
l.osu.edu
> 



_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/justin.williams2%40gma
il.com