[Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

[Gloria Whipple]

Amen!

Gloria Whipple


-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Carly
Mihalakis
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 14:39
To: Blind Talk Mailing List; 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired

Sing it, my sister!
CarlyAt 02:17 PM 6/21/2013, Gloria Whipple wrote:
>That is what my late husband and I would tell people. We are blind and that
>is that!
>
>What in the world is wrong with the word blind for heaven sakes!
>
>Gloria Whipple
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Carly
>Mihalakis
>Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 14:09
>To: Blind Talk Mailing List; 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
>Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired
>
>Here in Berkeley, they routinely ram that person first shit down our
>throats but I have to say, i am enucleated and therefore am not
>"impaired" by any strech of anyone's imagination, but am stone ass
>BLIND. When, in public people refer to my blind partner and I as
>"visually in paired" or "unsighted" I quickly correct them by  saying
>"no, I'm blind." People feel seem to feel so strongly about such an
>issue yet, those who conceivers of this so called People First
>lingo,to the best of my knowledge, are not themselves effected by
>anything separating them from the main stream. Oughtn't effected
>people be them deaf, blind  or  crippled, inform society as to how
>they would like to be referred?
>for today, Car
> >From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of
Christine
> >Szostak
> >Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:38 PM
> >To: Blind Talk Mailing List
> >Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired
> >
> >Hi,
> >   I suspect that actually the issue was not really with the term
visually
> >impaired, but rather with the order. When you say a "visually impaired
> >person" the disability comes first as  opposed to saying a "person with a
> >visual impairment". Thus, having the disability first is objected to, at
> >least this is what I am assuming the blogger was getting at.
> >Happy Friday!
> >Chris
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Kelby Carlson" <kelbycarlson at gmail.com>
> >To: <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
> >Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 4:24 PM
> >Subject: [Blindtlk] Use of the Term Visually Impaired
> >
> >
> > > Hi everybody!
> > >
> > > So, since I'm not aware of any incendiary debates flaring up around
here
> > > recently, I thought I'd bring up something I read recently that I
found
> > > utterly baffling.  This was on a blog thread about proper etiquette
>around
> >
> > > people with disabilities.  Towards the end, a discussion of language
> > > appropriateness came up, and someone said that "visually impaired" was
>an
> > > unacceptable term that should not be used.  Instead, one should say
>"with
> > > a visual impairment." I have heard similar things regaring the
phrasing
>of
> >
> > > a "blind person" versus "a person with blindness", but this was
>especially
> >
> > > perplexing because I can't recall ever meeting someone in my entire
life
> > > who was opposed to the term "visually impaired", at least when it was
>used
> >
> > > to describe someone who had some functional vision.  I don't have
strong
> > > feelings either way, but I would actually lean more to towards
>preferring
> > > visually impaired than "partially sighted", though I think neither one
>is
> > > more linguistically accurate than the other.
> > >
> > > I have encountered the issue of language surrounding disability many
> > > times, and it's always been a bit strange-don't we, as blind people
>(among
> >
> > > other people with various kinds of disabilities) have higher
priorities
>on
> >
> > > our lists of "things to fix in the world"? These are just my thoughts
on
> > > the matter.
> > >
> > > Kelby S.  Carlson
> > >
> > > Vanderbilt University
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > blindtlk mailing list
> > > blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> > > http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> > > To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> > > blindtlk:
> > >
>
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/szostak.1%40buckeyema
>i
> >l.osu.edu
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >blindtlk mailing list
> >blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> >http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> >To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
> >blindtlk:
>
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/justin.williams2%40gm
>a
> >il.com
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >blindtlk mailing list
> >blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> >http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> >To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
> >for blindtlk:
>
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40comcast.ne
>t
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindtlk mailing list
>blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
>blindtlk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/glowhi%40centurylink.
n
>et
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>blindtlk mailing list
>blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info 
>for blindtlk:
>http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40comcast.ne
t


_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/glowhi%40centurylink.n
et