[Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup
Julie J.
julielj at neb.rr.com
Thu Mar 21 13:08:00 UTC 2013
I think the answer to protecting the dogs is two fold. First I would
like to see a more in depth background investigation of the blind
applicant. Do a criminal background check, require more references, ask
the neighbors...whatever it takes. Adoption agencies place children
into homes surely we can figure out a way to more accurately know what
sort of situation the dog will be placed into. Secondly, I think there
are already agencies in place for dealing with animal abuse, the police
and animal control. I don't see any reason why these agencies can't be
used in cases of neglect or abuse.
In regard to cost and the blind applicant absorbing the cost of the dog
in order to own the dog outright is an extremely valid point. We have
to stop expecting everything for nothing. I like the Seeing Eye's
concept of charging the student. I do wish that the cost had increased
over the years with the cost of living. It has been $150 since the
beginning of the school in 1928. I think that's the right year. $150
was a very different sum of money then and now.
I also think that guide dogs can be raised and trained for substantially
lower sums of money than $60,000. If you look at the various guide dog
programs and how much each claims it costs to train a dog, the numbers
vary widely. All those buildings, fancy food, excessive equipment and
other niceties cost money.
Julie
More information about the BlindTlk
mailing list