[Blindtlk] Informed Choice Rules!!

Peter Donahue pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com
Thu Mar 21 18:55:45 UTC 2013


Hello Kelby and everyone,

    Informed choice rules! If you want a structured-discovery guide dog 
training experience be prepared to make the extra time commitment and if 
necessary be prepared to help cover the cost. For some individuals it would 
be exactly what they'd want particularly if they can obtain blindness 
training in other areas while training with their dog. This would be yet 
another option for obtaining a guide dog along with its minuses and plusses. 
Let me remind you. Informed choice rules!

Peter Donahue


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Carlson" <kelbycarlson at gmail.com>
To: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup


In my experience, a fully structure-discovery program with a dog
would take quite a bit more time.  This would more likely than
not increase the costs even more substantially.  Particularly in
the situation I'm in (a large college campus) a structured
discovery method wouldn't even work particularly well in our
situation.

I am still baffled as to why their is so much anger over the
ownership policy.  While the blind person's rights are important,
there has been a great deal of time and money invested in each
dog.  It seems reasonable that ownership is withheld for a
certain amount of time.  This
can work in the interest of the user as well-it can sometimes
take more than the training period discover that a guide dog is
not going to work in one's situation.
Kelby



 ----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Donahue" <pdonahue2 at satx.rr.com
To: "Blind Talk Mailing List" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org
Date sent: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 12:17:22 -0500
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup

Hello Bryan and everyone,

    Too often the dog's rights trump those of its blind owner.The
Seeing Eye
not withstanding these so-called "Ownership policies" of guide
dog schools
are nothing but a joke! Training one's own dog is definitely n
option if one
has the time and resources to put towards it but for others a
quality guide
dog program that employs the NFB philosophy and the
Structured-Discovery
Immersion Training Model would be very much desired.  If you're
happy with
your current guide dog school there's nothing to stop you from
returning to
them for subsequent dogs but for God's sake get behind an effort
to bring
the kind of guide dog training program wanted by some guide dog
users in to
existence!

 Peter Donahue

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian Miller" <brianrmiller88 at gmail.com
To: "'Blind Talk Mailing List'" <blindtlk at nfbnet.org
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2013 6:58 AM
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup


Hi all,

I certainly respect anyone's choice of guide dog schools, but I
would not
equate this issue to that of sheltered workshops.

I don't know about all of the schools, and I very much appreciate
that many
schools have been bastions of negative attitudes about blindness.

My understanding is, however, that at least in the case of Guide
Dogs for
the Blind in San Rafael, California, you have the option to take
full
ownership of your dog after one year.  I know some will see this
as still
too paternalistic, and I respect that, but I think it's also
important to
recognize that this isn't just about the blind person, but about
the dogs.
Schools like Guide Dogs invest tens of thousands of dollars in
raising ,
training, and supporting the dogs and their handlers.  They have
a interest
in ensuring that this investment is maximized, and also to ensure
that the
dogs are well cared for.

Blind people get the dogs and the training for free -- if we are
so
insistent on full and outright ownership of the dogs, should we
also not
accept the full cost of the dog's training?  I suspect this is
far beyond
the ability of most blind people to manage.

Guide Dogs also provides a lot of follow-up care, including the
paying of
most vet bills, which runs hundreds of dollars every year.

The follow-up visits are more than just check-ins, but training
opportunities.  I think it's a matter of perspective as to how
intrusive or
even oppressive these visits are.

I think it would be interesting to know how many dogs are taken
away from
their handlers.  I suspect that the number is very small, but
still it's
worth knowing to get a sense of the scope of the issue.

I think it's one thing to talk of ownership, but another thing to
take on
the full cost of doing so, or the full cost of running such an
operation
ourselves.  I certainly would want as many blind people in charge
of guide
dog schools as possible, assuming they have the management skills
to do so,
and I recognize that far too many schools see their work as
charity not
empowerment of blind people, but this is not the case of all
schools, and
Seeing Eye isn't the only school trying to balance the needs of
the blind
person and the dog and the community.

I'm not a dog user, but I still felt compelled to offer some
thoughts for
what they are worth -- thanks!.

Respectfully,

Brian Miller



 -----Original Message-----
 From: blind [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf
 Of Danielle Antoine
 Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 3:03 AM
 To: Blind Talk Mailing List
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup

 Peter, Amen and Hallelujah! the seeing Eye's policies just
 fit my personal philosophy.  It is why after doing much
 extensive research and consideration I always go back to TSE!
 I view the ownership and mandatory follow-ups by most of the
 schools as degrading and akin to workshop pay.  something is
 wrong with this lack of trust in in the quality they put out.
 graduates should be treated as the grown adults they are not
 as grade-schoolers where ththey must be checked up on and
 graded so to speak.  TSE never ever checks up on its grad and
 they only come when and if you ever need them....providing
 honest and fair assessments.  Only way I'll ever go anywhere
 else is if they should ever refuse me service or my health
 requirements dictate.

 Sometimes, circumstances beyond our control interferes with a
 team and shortens the working relationship and that should be
 taken into consideration by the schools retaining ownership.
 JMO and personal experience!

 On 12/16/12, Mike Freeman <k7uij at panix.com> wrote:
 Money money money!

 -----Original Message-----
 From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
 Behalf Of Diane
 Graves
 Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 11:13 AM
 To: 'Blind Talk Mailing List'
 Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup

 Now that would be a good idea.  After all, we have a strong
 O&M program
 run by our own for cane users.  Why *not* have a guide dog
 program? I
 like that idea.

 Diane Graves

 -----Original Message-----
 From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On
 Behalf Of Peter
 Donahue
 Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2012 1:49 PM
 To: Blind Talk Mailing List
 Subject: [Blindtlk] Canes and Dogs, the In-House Checkup

 Good afternoon everyone,

     I'm increasingly becoming convinced that some of this
 misunderstanding is being generated by our own guide dog
 users and not
 just those outside the federation.  This came clear to me
 judging from
 the reactions of those attending this year's NAGDU Meeting
 in Dallas
 last summer concerning several issues being discussed.
     For years the NFB has been trying to convince guide dog
 schools to
 end the practice of retaining ownership of their dogs and adopt
a
 policy similar to that of The Seeing Eye.  Put simply as Lucas
Frank
 said last summer "We have no (Ownership policy)! When students
 complete training they leave the school with their dog and it is
 there's."We also know that a number of schools that retain
 ownership
 have wrongfully taken dogs from their handlers with no
 explaination of
 why.  We just picketted Amazon last Wednesday.  I'll retract
 this belief
 concerning the use of guide dogs when NAGDU organizes
 pickets of guide
 dog programs that wrongfully take dogs from their blind handlers
to
 bring public awareness to this shabby practice.

         Likewise I worked with several NAGDU Members to
 craft a "Guide
 Dog consumer Bill of Rights." During the NAGDU meeting
 schools at the
 convention were asked to indicate whether or not they would
 "Sign on"
 and recognize the rights of the blind consumers they serve.
Some
 refused to comment.  Others side-stepped the issue all together
and
 still others wanted to "Negotiate."

 I shure hope we don't go down the negotiation path and allow
these
 outfits to water down this document.  As far as I know not one
guide
 dog program has signed on to the Guide Dog Consumer Bill of
Rights.

     Going back to the matter of ownership retention when Marion
 Gwizdala and a few others spoke out strongly against the beliefs
of
 guide dog programs that ownership was necessary pittifully few
in
 attendence applauded.  Yet these same people joind others to
 help bring
 the house down when it came to cheering on those that spoke in
 opposition to the continued payment of subminamum wages to
 blind shop
 workers! If you asked me something is very wrong with that
picture!

     If the NFB was more agressive in addressing these
 matters we would
 be more visible and people would know that we do indeed
recognize
 one's choice to use a guide dog for independent travel and
 are a force
 in the affairs of guide dog users.  If folks find this
 offensive I'll
 gladly retrack what I said when the following conditions are
met:

 1.  Greater publicity is given to the practice of ownership
 retention
 of dogs by guide dog schools.
 2.  All schools recognize the NFB'S Guide Dog Consumer Bill
 of Rights
 as it was originally drafted.
 3.  More is done to urge all guide dog programs to employ
 blind persons
 as guide dog trainers and class instructors.
 4.  (This is the big one.) We entertain discussion
 concerning the NFB'S
 establishing its own guide dog program; a program operated by
guide
 dog users for guide dog users!

     I have repeatedly suggested such a discussion to President
 Gwizddala but to date it has not been an item for discussion
during
 the NAGDU Meeting.

     If there are still folks that think we're anty guide
 dog we should
 look within our organization to see if there are actions
 and lack of
 actions that are still perpetuating this myth.  Persuing
 more agressive
 solutions to the issues I've discussed above could put us
 further down
 the road to ending this misunderstanding.  All the best.


 Peter Donahue


 _______________________________________________
 blindtlk mailing list
 blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
 account info for
 blindtlk:


http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/princess.di
2007%
 40gmai
 l.com


 _______________________________________________
 blindtlk mailing list
 blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
 account info for
 blindtlk:


http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40pan
ix.co
 m


 _______________________________________________
 blindtlk mailing list
 blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your
 account info for
 blindtlk:


http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/singingmywa
yin%4
 0gmail.com


 _______________________________________________
 blindtlk mailing list
 blindtlk at nfbnet.org
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
 To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account
 info for blindtlk:
 http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/brianrmi
 ller88%40gmail.com


_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/pdonahue2%4
0satx.rr.com


_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info
for blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/kelbycarlso
n%40gmail.com

_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for 
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/pdonahue2%40satx.rr.com 





More information about the BlindTlk mailing list