[Blindtlk] Illegal Expulsions

Wed Sep 24 02:04:13 UTC 2014

Amen.

-----Original Message-----
From: blindtlk [mailto:blindtlk-bounces at nfbnet.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Nusbaum via blindtlk
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 6:01 PM
To: Ray Foret Jr; Blind Talk Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Illegal Expulsions

I too am unfamiliar with the politics of the Texas affiliate, but I might
suggest that this list is not the appropriate place to discuss it. Though
our purpose here is in fact to discuss issues surrounding the Federation,
discussing what the Texas affiliate or the national board should or should
not do year would accomplish nothing. If someone feels that Texas ought to
be looked at by the national board for a parent wrong doings there, that
person might be better served by contacting the board or the president
directly. Just my thoughts.

Chris Nusbaum

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:58 PM, Ray Foret Jr via blindtlk
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
> 
> I think you missunderstand somewhat.  If a member of the federation
conducts himself or herself in a way which is unbecoming to a federationist:
(that is to say that if the person attacks personally any officer or member
of the federation politically or with the intent of destroying the good name
of that person) that individual can be expelled.  I am not familiar with
what has been going on in Texas, but, frankly, someone made a remark which
causes me to think that they believe the national board most likely needs to
take a closer look at Texas and perhaps correct some wrong doings there.
> 
> 
> Sincerely,
> the Constantly Barefooted Ray, Still a very happy Mac and iphone user!
> Sent from my Mac, the only computer with full accessibility for the blind
built-in and fully protected by ClamXav Antivirus!
> 
>> On Sep 23, 2014, at 6:42 PM, Carly Mihalakis via blindtlk
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Afternoon, Peter, and everyone
>> ,
>>       Please pardon any ignorance on my part but, ought it matter whom
frequents meetings? I mean, by virtue of a person's presence at said
meetings, doesn't that indicate their having blind people's best interests
in mind?
>> CarAt 07:22 PM 9/22/2014, Linda via blindtlk wrote:
>>> Excuse my ignorance. If a person is not a member of an organization,
then how can they be expelled? I suppose if the non-members are disruptive,
then they should not be at the meeting.  If these people are respectful,
then what is the issue in allowing them to attend?
>>> 
>>>> On Sep 22, 2014, at 10:02 PM, Peter Donahue via blindtlk
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hello Mark and everyone,
>>>> 
>>>>  Blind individuals were "Expelled" from this organization     who
weren't members or chose not to renew their membership due to problems in
their local chapter. Texas is one affiliate that has done this and needs to
be held accountable by the national organization for such negligence. A
simple check of the current dues paying members of our local chapter could
have prevented this from happening. Let that get out in the press and media.
No one will want to join an organization with a record of expelling
non-renewing members.
>>>> 
>>>> Peter Donahue
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Tardif via blindtlk"
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> To: "Sherri" <flmom2006 at gmail.com>; "Blind Talk Mailing List"
<blindtlk at nfbnet.org>
>>>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 6:19 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Blindtlk] Vote on U.N. disability treaty blocked
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> Bloody figures, of course.  That's all I'm going to say because what I
really feel like saying is simply unprintable on an open list.  So much so,
in fact, that someone might want to throw me out of NFB for behavior not
becoming of a Federationist, grin.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark Tardif
>>>>> Nuclear arms will not hold you.
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Sherri via blindtlk
>>>>> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 9:58 AM
>>>>> To: NFB Talk Mailing List ; blindtlk at nfbnet.org ; nfbf-l at nfbnet.org
>>>>> Subject: [Blindtlk] Vote on U.N. disability treaty blocked
>>>>> 
>>>>> Just passing on. Don't want to start a debate!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sherri
>>>>> 
>>>>> Vote On UN Disability Treaty Blocked
>>>>> 
>>>>> By Michelle Diament | September 17, 2014
>>>>> An objection from a Republican senator Wednesday derailed an attempt
to
>>>>> bring a vote on ratification of the United Nations Convention on the
Rights
>>>>> of Persons
>>>>> with Disabilities. (Thinkstock)
>>>>> 
>>>>> An objection from a Republican senator Wednesday derailed an attempt
to
>>>>> bring a vote on ratification of the United Nations Convention on the
Rights
>>>>> of Persons
>>>>> with Disabilities. (Thinkstock)
>>>>> 
>>>>> An effort in the U.S. Senate to bring a vote on an international
disability
>>>>> rights treaty has been squashed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, took to the Senate floor Wednesday calling
for a
>>>>> unanimous consent vote on the United Nations Convention on the Rights
of
>>>>> Persons
>>>>> with Disabilities.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The senator requested two hours of debate on the treaty with no
amendments
>>>>> followed by an up-or-down vote much like the Senate did two years ago.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Within minutes, however, the plan was shot down with an objection from
Sen.
>>>>> Mike Lee, R-Utah, who said that two hours of debate was insufficient
and
>>>>> indicated
>>>>> that amendments should be allowed.
>>>>> 
>>>>> "There are a number of our colleagues, both on and off the committee,
who
>>>>> have concerns with this treaty," Lee said.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The U.N. Convention, which establishes an international standard for
>>>>> disability rights similar to what's already in place domestically
through
>>>>> the Americans
>>>>> with Disabilities Act, was signed by the United States in 2009, but
Senate
>>>>> approval is needed for ratification and official participation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> The treaty is broadly supported by disability advocates and many civil
>>>>> rights, faith, business and veterans organizations. However, critics
>>>>> spearheaded
>>>>> by the Home School Legal Defense Association contend that the treaty
would
>>>>> compromise U.S. sovereignty.
>>>>> 
>>>>> A previous effort in 2012 to ratify the U.N. Convention
>>>>> failed
>>>>> in the Senate on a largely party-lines vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Harkin said it was "another sad, irresponsible day in the U.S. Senate"
after
>>>>> Lee's objection derailed his hope for a new vote.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Earlier this week, the United Nations announced that 150 countries
have
>>>>> ratified the disability treaty.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sherri
>>>>> 
>>>>> Character is the side of yourself you choose to show the world.
>>>>> Integrity is what you do, what you say and how you act when you think
no one
>>>>> is paying attention.
>>>>> Sherri Brun
>>>>> NFBF Newsline Chair
>>>>> flmom2006 at gmail.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> blindtlk mailing list
>>>>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>>>>>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/markspark%40roadrunner
.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----
>>>>> No virus found in this message.
>>>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>>>> Version: 2013.0.3485 / Virus Database: 4015/8258 - Release Date:
09/22/14
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> blindtlk mailing list
>>>>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>>>>>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/pdonahue2%40satx.rr.co
m
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
>>>> http://www.avast.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> blindtlk mailing list
>>>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>>>>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/waterinmyroom%40gmail.
com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> blindtlk mailing list
>>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>>>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/carlymih%40comcast.net
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> blindtlk mailing list
>> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
>> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
>> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/rforet7706%40comcast.n
et
> 
> _______________________________________________
> blindtlk mailing list
> blindtlk at nfbnet.org
> http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
> To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
>
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/dotkid.nusbaum%40gmail
.com

_______________________________________________
blindtlk mailing list
blindtlk at nfbnet.org
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/listinfo/blindtlk_nfbnet.org
To unsubscribe, change your list options or get your account info for
blindtlk:
http://nfbnet.org/mailman/options/blindtlk_nfbnet.org/k7uij%40panix.com